• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Handling Experiments,Observations and Data

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Handling Experimental observations and data. Title: The no. of moles of water crystallization in a hydrated salt, Aim: To determine the water of crystallization in the hydrated salt, copper sulphate. Apparatus: electronic balance, crucible, tongs, Bunsen burner, wire gauze, tripod stand, pipe - clay triangle, spatula, . Theory: To determine the number of moles of water of crystallization in a hydrated salt, a small amount of the hydrated salt is taken, heated gently and then heated strongly to remove the water of crystallization. Procedure: 1. Take a clean and dry beaker and weigh it out accurately in an electronic balance. 2. Weigh out accurately 2.5 g of hydrated copper sulphate crystals in the crucible. ...read more.

Middle

* In the space of about two minutes the blue colour of the copper sulphate crystals starts fading. * After time clumps of the substance is formed. * The substance is heated strongly and most of the crystals are decolourized to white now. * A minute or so passes and all of the copper sulphate crystals are completely white. Controlled Variables: 2.5g of hydrated copper sulphate Weight of beaker 50g Calculations Weight of hydrated copper sulphate + beaker before heating = 52.50g Weight of copper sulphate + beaker after heating = 51.44g Weight of water evaporated from hydrated copper sulphate = 52.5- 51.44 = 1.06g Weight of hydrated copper sulphate = 2.5g Weight of anhydrous copper sulphate = 2.5 - 1.06 = 1.44g R.M.M of water = (2�1) ...read more.

Conclusion

=159.5g No. of moles of water incorporated into 159.5g of anhydrous copper sulphate = 0.04 � 159.5 = 6.38g Anomalous Result: Copper sulphate has five (5) moles of water but after heating I found it to have 6.38g. This was caused by experimental mistakes. Sources of Error I did not heat the substance gently properly. I let the spatula touch the substance. Ways to Improve Experimental Results I could improve my experimental result but fix the way I gentle heat the substance by waving it over the flame to make sure that all the water particles are evaporated out of the anhydrous copper sulphate. Conclusion The water crystallization in 2.5g of copper sulphate was evaporated by firstly being heated gently and then strongly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The response to the question is done well. The candidate outlines the experiment accurately and considers a variety of things that may have affected the experiment. To improve they should explain the science behind the experiment more such as the ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The response to the question is done well. The candidate outlines the experiment accurately and considers a variety of things that may have affected the experiment. To improve they should explain the science behind the experiment more such as the hydrogen bonding or have included chemical reactions to show their understanding.

Level of analysis

The candidate clearly states their aims and the method of the experiment well. They also include weights and the variables to be kept constant although it is not noted why this is. Table of results is consistent with decimal places. Observations are recorded accurately and succinctly. The workings out are clear and correct. The candidate could have pointed out more sources of error to show a greater understanding of their result. They suggest some improvements but not to a high level, they should include more detail. The conclusion was not really needed in this instance as it just stated things already said.

Quality of writing

Some minor punctuation errors in places with commas that are not needed. List of apparatus not ordered tidily. Minor grammatical errors seen in places. Otherwise spelling, grammar and punctuation mostly okay.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by skatealexia 25/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Formula of a hydrated salt

    4 star(s)

    ? Mean Titre (cm3) 17.50 To find the mean titre I used the average of only titrations that were concordant with each other (they agreed to at least 0.1 cm3). So to find the mean I used (17.45 + 17.50)

  2. Determine Solubility of KClO3 Salt.

    than the required temperature because there is temperature gradient between the test tube and the water inside the beaker. Besides this, there is no 100% transfer of heat from water bath to the KClO3 solution inside the test tube. Some heat will be transferred to the environment.

  1. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

    I tried using hot water from a kettle to dissolve the solute in and this worked well, enabling me to get the concentration of solution that I wanted. But when I put this concentration of Potassium Manganate (aq) into the burette I found that it covered the walls in a

  2. Determination of the formula of Hydrated Iron(II) Sulphate Crystals

    Results: Initial(cm3) 0.0 22.3 3.6 0.0 Final(cm3) 22.3 44.5 25.9 22.3 Titre(cm3) 22.3 22.2 22.3 22.3 Mass of FeSO4.nH2O used = 3.05g. Average titre= (22.3+22.2+22.3+22.3)/4 =22.275cm3. Analysis: With these results it is possible to calculate the amount of water from the mass of water obtained from the mass of hydrated iron(II)

  1. Investigating the Effects of Increasing Copper Sulphate Solution Concentrations on the Germination of Cress ...

    I am using distilled water in the solution because it means I can control the levels of other macronutrients and micronutrients available. If I remove the other nutrients, it will mean that it is only the levels of copper sulphate available that is changing.

  2. The aim of this experiment is to answer the following question: What is the ...

    This was a bad thing because it meant the water bath could not maintain the correct temperature for the reaction and it can damage the water bath. A modification I am making is to take out 60oC from my temperature range.

  1. Collision Theory

    The greater the surface area, the greater the area available for the particles to react, thus increasing the rate of reaction. If a solid is broken up into smaller pieces the surface area will be increased. This means that a powder of any substance reacts faster than a block.

  2. Specific Heat Capacity

    99.8 99.8 100.0 100.0 These values can be put into an equation to find the specific heat capacity of each metal. The equation is: mbc x (t - t1) = (ms2) + m1s1) (t2 - t1) where c is the specific heat capacity of the metal, s1is the specific heat capacity of copper (387Jkg-1K-1)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work