• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There is a lot to be gained by studying a topic in psychology from more than one perspective. Discuss this claim drawing on Chapters 2 and 3 from Book 2 to illustrate your points.

Extracts from this document...


'There is a lot to be gained by studying a topic in psychology from more than one perspective.' Discuss this claim drawing on Chapters 2 and 3 from Book 2 to illustrate your points. What is it that makes us human? Contemporary psychology aims to understand this complex issue in considering psychological phenomena through its diverse perspectives. Each perspective differs in epistemology and methodology producing specific reasoning and explanation. More than one perspective can explain a topic and this eclecticism produces complementarity, conflict or co-existence between perspectives. Applying these relationships by introducing a number of perspectives on the topics of language and meaning and s*x and gender, this essay will discuss the claim that there is a lot to be gained by studying a topic from more than one perspective. Why are there so many approaches to psychology? Due to human complexity, distinctive psychological perspectives exist because there are particular ways of conceptualizing psychological phenomena each seeking different objects of knowledge. The biological perspective looks at relationships between biological processes and behaviour focusing on anatomical mechanisms and functionality. The Psychoanalytic perspective explores the role of the unconscious mind, influences of childhood experiences and interpersonal relationships in explaining human behaviour. ...read more.


and as a tool, is directly connected to its socially realized purpose (Edwards et al., as cited in Cooper & Kaye, 2007, p.112). In contrast, cognitive psychologists propose meaning is created through parallel processing of novel, sequential, syntactic and semantic information involving incremental syntactic analysis (McClelland and Rumelhart; Pickering; Frazier and Rayner; as cited in Cooper & Kaye, 2007, pp.90-5) and contextual input of scripts (Schank and Abelson; Kintsch; as cited in Cooper & Kaye, 2007, pp.97-8). Therefore, individuals process meaning to produce or understand language. From this, cognitive scientists believe mapping meaning through language is fairly transparent. However, discourse analysis of a pre-existing, cognitive scientific study on attribution theory found not causal inference but motivated creation of subject positions (Edwards and Potter; as cited in Cooper & Kaye, 2007, p.109). Therefore, social constructionists propose we can only study the function of language as meaning derives from the perspective in which it is based; this challenge to logical empiricism thus argues for methodological reflexivity. Furthermore, debate amongst evolutionary psychologists argues between claims that language founded our cognitive abilities to those that suggest metarepresentational abilities influenced language development (Pinker; Sperber; as cited in Cooper & Kaye, 2007, p.121). ...read more.


As a result, whether different perspectives can combined into one complementary theory on a topic is debateable and this questions the benefits of multi-perspective study. In conclusion, looking at any one topic produces different answers depending on who is asked and which aspect of psychology is considered. Each perspective has two functions; to provide static, in depth bodies of knowledge and to engage in dynamic dialectic processes. Regarding knowledge, human psychological complexity requires each perspectives specialism thus psychology is characterised by diversity and this set of conceptual and methodological tools is indispensable in a common desire to explain the workings of the mind. In terms of dialogue, there are more ways to divide perspectives, theories and methodologies than ways to integrate them. Therefore, overarching explanations appear inferior to a comprehensive 'oscillating' truth constantly adding chains to the history of psychological understanding which is adaptive within the dynamism of historical, cultural and academic paradigms. Furthermore, considering the existential dichotomies of nature-nurture and objective-subjective dilemmas having no solution, this inescapable fact sees the ability of a multi-perspective approach as the most beneficial and balanced way to explore psychological topics. Therefore, there is a lot to be gained by studying a topic in psychology from more than one perspective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Psychology essays

  1. Tony Montana, a case study of the effectiveness of Sigmund Freud(TM)s Psychoanalytic approach to ...

    Freud's theory included 5 stages of psychosexual development which we go through from birth to early adulthood. The first stage is the oral stage and occurs around birth to two years. This is when personality is dominated by the id and can be seen as selfish.

  2. Discuss the notion that deviance is socially constructed, drawing on and contrasting Cannabis use ...

    early 100 football supporters were crushed to death. This suggests that the construct of society is a prominent factor in deviance. When an individual deviates from a social norm a label may be imposed upon them by society. Labelling not only affects how society views an individual, but also how the person views themselves.

  1. An eight-page paper discussing the cause of aggressiveness in humans - nature or nurture

    Harris has carried out a number of surveys in her book to show that friends and acquaintances have more influence on a person's behavior than the parents. She asks parents to "guide your child's peer-group choices wisely," for that is how the parents can indirectly play a role in the child's behavioral development.

  2. Explain the importance of team building, the stages in the development of team cohesion ...

    They will do whatever it takes including disagreeing and arguing in pursuit of goal achievement which is why they may hurt other member's feelings. According to Belbin; having two or three shapers in a group, 'can lead to conflict, aggravation and in-fighting.'23 Team workers make helpful interventions to avert potential

  1. Multiple Sclerosis: Functional History (Department of Psychology - University of Liverpool)

    Functional Limitations of MS As a neuropsychiatric disease which affects young people, MS threatens personal autonomy, independence, dignity and future plans (Boeije, Duijnstee, Grypdonck and Pool, 2002). As a relapsing-remitting disorder MS patients encounter an unpredictable course (Confavreaux, Vukusic and Adeleine, 2003 cited in Mitchell et al., 2005); as an

  2. Evolutionary Psychology.

    the rate of incidence was equal between the genders, even hypothesizing that attacks by female patients were more "assaultive" (sic) than those from the men included in the studies (Binder, Mc Niel, 1990). I would hope these are women, who due to their disorderly conduct and inability to nurture a

  1. Neutrality in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysts draw many parallels with Batman. Psychoanalysts are also devoted ...

    In consultations with patients, Ferenczi expressed an empathetic attunement and warmth to the patient, sharing feelings, thoughts and observations that were not only related to the therapy, but also his personal life (Meissner, 1998). This synergism between patient and therapist, wherein Ferenczi disclosed to patients, was a direct challenge to

  2. Emotions and facial processing of emotions

    Miyazawa and Iwasaki (2010) stated that Juth et al (2005) found a happiness superiority effect with real faces (as stated above), but found an anger superiority effect with schematic faces. A possible reason for this could be the fact that using schematic faces results in low ecological validity (the extent to which the experiment is true to everyday life).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work