Identify and explore any three ways in which the Church affected the development of the arts during 12-17th centuries.

Authors Avatar

Identify and explore any three ways in which the Church affected the development of the arts during 12-17th centuries. Which do you think was most significant? Give reasons for your answer.

Such was the wealth and power of the Church between the 12th and 17th centuries that it impacted on all aspects of life at the time. The Church has influenced a wide variety of art forms: literature, visual, music and even architecture and I would like to examine exactly how these developments occurred.  The Church saw art as a way of upholding its ascendancy and broadening the message that God was to be regarded as an omnipotent figure, ostracised from Mankind because of the sins, which had tainted the original purity of earth.

        

In terms of visual art, the Church commanded a didactic way of portraying the key ideologies of Christianity.  Christianity consisted of complex abstract notions for which a new language of symbols was adopted in order to convey their meanings.  The Church realised that with a mostly illiterate population, spreading the word of God through texts was not a feasible option. As a result, the symbols, which express such ideals, became an ingenious way of passing on the notions of the Bible to a largely illiterate Christian laity. A good example of the church branding visual art with its own ideals is Duccio’s “The Annuncciation” (1308-1311).  It portrays the Immaculate Conception – one of the key beliefs of Christianity – the moment the Virgin Mary is told by the Arch-Angel Gabriel of her fate, to give birth to the Son of God.

        

The first thing to notice about this painting is its clever use of symbols. The white lilies in the painting symbolise the ‘immaculate’ nature and virginity of Mary.  The dove represents the Holy Spirit and is painted in an “emblematic or heraldic” manner that symbolises its importance.  It is placed perfectly at the picture’s central axis, canopied by an “emphatic arch”.  The use of the white dove, like the lilies, aids the representation of purity and virginity in the painting.

The building makes a powerful contribution to the painting, as well as reinforcing the omnipotence of God and heaven.   There is a clear partition between Gabriel and Mary, made obvious by the grey pillar, which stands between the two figures. The building appears to be open to the sky on Gabriel’s side, yet roofed with “coffered timber” on Mary’s side.  It is as if Mary will never be able to transcend the boundaries of human nature, while Arch-Angel Gabriel has limitless opportunities.  Even the colours of the pillars on each side vary, with the pillars on Gabriel’s side being a warm shade of terracotta, whilst on Mary’s side they are a cold, gloomy inescapable shade of grey; such is the inevitability of her fate.  

Join now!

This idea of division extends beyond the physical aspects of the building, which separate these two characters.  Gabriel appears to have a kind of spring in his step and his entry is given “kinetic energy” by the way his right leg is outstretched and by the way his hand seems to be projecting towards Mary in an act of greeting.  These actions certainly create the impression of forward propulsion on the Archangel’s part. Mary’s reaction to Gabriel’s bold entrance is a stark contrast.  She seems to raise her right elbow in recoil as a defence mechanism.  In doing so, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay