Why was Bob Dylan "the voice of his generation" in the sixties and why do his songs continue to resonate today?

Authors Avatar

Why was Bob Dylan “the voice of his generation” in the sixties and why do his songs continue to resonate today?

With little doubt, Bob Dylan has been one of the most influential characters in popular music within his 40 year career. Although he has experienced significant success in his later work, it has been his sixties material that has caused the biggest impact. His songs of protest were extremely popular in the sixties, particularly among the hippie subculture that was so prominent at the time. As his career and popularity soared, Dylan was soon branded as “the voice of his generation” and became synonymous with the anti-war and civil rights movements at the time. How Dylan managed to be branded with this tag and how he became to embody the movement is comprehensible through an analysis of his work.

Dylan began his career as part of a vibrant folk scene that was happening in America at the time. His popularity soared within this scene after his first self-titled album that was a tribute to his musical influences. In his second album, (The Freewheelin’ released in 1963) Dylan began to write songs that would be considered “protest songs”, and these shot Dylan to global fame and recognition, particularly among the newly rising “hippie” movement. In order to look at why Dylan’s work captured the voice of this subculture, one must look at the social and political conditions of the time and how his music commented on these conditions. The sixties was a time of great political commotion in America, from tensions in the Cold War, to the cries for civil rights by Americas black community. By the time of Dylan’s second album, the cold war tensions and the civil rights movements were at their peak. Dylan’s first protest song, and perhaps his most famous, was called “Blowin’ in the Wind” (1) and became adopted by the civil rights movement at the time. Through its rhetoric, the song comments on social injustices and inequalities as well as questioning the action of war. Through this song Dylan asks the question “how many years can some people exist before they are allowed to be free?” and continues to ask “how many times can a man turn his head and pretend that he just doesn’t see?”. Many felt that this question was related to the civil rights movement at the time, and although Dylan never mentioned the movement in the song, it soon became adopted as a song of the civil rights movement. They felt that these lines reflected the oppression felt among the black community, and questioned the integrity of those who see these injustices but do nothing to stop them. Another song on the album that focuses on the trouble of racism is entitled “Oxford Town” (2) that contained the lines “he went down to Oxford town, guns and clubs followed him down, all because his face was brown” and “he couldn’t get in because of the colour of his skin”. Many felt that this summed up the social injustices that blacks faced in America at the time. The segregation of whites and blacks in everyday life was a prominent grievance of the civil rights movement, who felt it unfair that blacks should have to use inferior facilities like having to sit at the back of a bus because the more convenient front seats were reserved for whites. These lines were certainly perceived by the civil rights movement as relating to their cause and Dylan became very popular with the movement. Dylan became actively involved within the movement, performing at the “March on Washington” where Martin Luther King made his famous “I have a dream” speech, which only proved to enforce the feeling that Bob Dylan was a protestor and a voice for inequalities.

Join now!

This was one of the only times Dylan was actively involved in politics, yet his association with politics was predictable as he continued to write more protest songs. The main feature of his protest songs was the strong anti-war sentiment that allot of his songs carried. His song “Masters of War” (3) was a clear attack on those who instigate war and those who build “the death planes, those who build all the bombs”. He also commented on the economic ironies of war as he claims “you sit in your mansion, while the young people’s blood, flows out of their bodies ...

This is a preview of the whole essay