USING RELEVANT REREARCH, AS WELL AS PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES, DISCUSS AND ANALYSE WHAT YOU UNDERSTAND BY THE IMPORTANCE OF DRAMA AS A TOOL FOR LEARNING.

Drama has played a significant role within educational institutions for some time and, consequently, is by no means a new subject.  Elizabethan grammar-school education involved a great deal of acting and, during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, several schools in England used Drama.  At the turn of the century, John Allen cites that a Board of Education Report for 1898:

        

Speaks approvingly of the beneficial effect of practical Drama on ‘vitalising

language and quickening the perceptive and expressive faculties of boyhood.’

However, Drama was not recognised as a subject in its own right and tended to be focused upon the staging of plays.  Despite this there does seem to have been one man who appreciated the importance of educational Drama both as a subject, and as a tool for learning in the teaching of English.  In his book The play way (1914) a schoolteacher named Cauldwell Cook described how he taught Shakespeare to pupils by actually acting out the scenes in a small studio, as opposed to reading through the text.  Rather than stopping to explain the meanings of words or phrases, the message was conveyed through the acting.  Unfortunately, after Mr. Cook died in 1928, his method was not continued in the school, much to the dismay of the pupils.  Performances were still enacted in schools but theatrical considerations were deemed to be the important elements of the Drama, such as “Mime, Movement and The Ballad” and “Lighting the School Stage” rather than the emphasis being upon the actual processes which are undertaken in order to acquire the finished product.

        In 1949 the Ministry of Education began to examine the role of Drama within education, as many institutions appeared to disagree on the question of whether Drama was merely a theatrical exercise or a subject which, in an educational context, would enhance personal growth.  One advocate of the latter view was Peter Slade whose book Child Drama (1954) was instrumental in changing the attitudes which prevailed at the time.  He believed that child drama was an art form in its own right, and that it should be “recognised, respected and protected.” In 1961, Alington, another revolutionary in the field of Drama, divided the subject into five categories: play, movement, mime, improvisation and scripted plays, and this format eventually became the recognised form for the GCSE syllabus.  The distinction between Theatre and Drama was clearly defined in 1967 by Way, who said that Theatre was a communication between actors and audience and Drama was an experience shared by all of the participants, regardless of communication.  Essentially, this statement meant that Drama was something for everyone not purely talented actors in the Theatre.

        

In the 1960’s and 70’s Dorothy Heathcote promoted Drama as a tool for learning and developed “Whole Group Drama” which concentrated upon the methods of Drama rather than the finished product.  In her teaching, “thinking and feeling” were the important aspects.  However, although her work was extremely respected, one of her contemporaries at the time, Gavin Bolton, suggested that drama appeared to be:

Join now!

        All preparation and no performance.

Although Bolton agreed with Heathcote, he also saw Drama as being a “heightened experience” and endorsed a rigid structure to support this in its teaching.  Both Heathcote and Bolton continued to develop their ideas throughout the 1970’s and by 1984 Bolton decided that Drama was indeed a tool for learning and never about individual learning but rather something “outside of self” which, although emphasised the process there was also a finished product.

        

Much debate took place as to the status of Drama in the National Curriculum during the 1980’s.  Finally instead of receiving ...

This is a preview of the whole essay