The Big Brother production team always warn the contestants of what might happen after they leave the house, and how it will affect them. They do not have any control over the media and what their views are on the contestants. The Media imply that the companies of these particular shows use the contestants are warned several times about the shows disadvantages before hand. Big Brother establishes authority over the contestants by controlling their actions by issuing rules, which must be obeyed or they will be forced to leave the Big Brother game. When a contestant is rebelling against the rules, Big Brother will call them to the diary room and will remind them of the rules and the consequences. This is usually completed by the masculine, authoritative voice of one of the male members of the production team. Privacy is more or less prohibited by Big Brother because viewers like to know and see all, their ratings would suffer if viewers felt cheated.
The contestants of these types of shows are normally seeking fame and money. Both these prizes are for gain but so are public hate and ridicule. I feel the question of whether or not we should allow this lies in the hands of the contestants due to the fact they are profusely warned of the set backs of participating in these particular shows. An example of this would be a previous contestant of Big Brother. ‘Jade Goody’ gained both ridicule and fame during her time in the famous house. Also she has profited greatly from the publicity bestowed upon her by appearing the reality TV show. Another drawback to the situation would include that when the contestants leave the house they have had a particular persona created for them by things such as the media and the way the shows are edited.
When Channel 4 edits Big Brother, they will usually show one side of a person to create the persona to show the public, this will help viewers like or dislike a contestant. An example of favouritism in reality television is ‘Kate Lawler’, the winner of Big Brother 2002. Channel 4 edited the shows to make Kate seem nice and not two faced. Channel 4 had seen Kate as a moneymaker, she would be the first woman to have one Big Brother UK. Therefore see would be remembered more than just a winner of Big Brother. Like TV soaps the television companies are trying creating characters to gain viewers.
The viewers gain satisfaction from these types of shows due to the fact they enjoy watching people make fools of them selves and watching hostile situations from a safe distance. The general public also like to see everyday people, interacting in everyday situations. Also viewers can have some control over who or what they want to see by voting people they dislike or are bored with. The viewers get to see new faces on television rather than faces they’ve seen before.
My conclusion to my analysis of reality television in general is that it is another form of entertainment and should not be taken so seriously by the general public and media. People should realise that the contestants are placed in extra ordinary situations. Contestants choose to be put in these situations for fame, money, attention and to escape from their normal, routine lives. Reality TV shows take advantage of a society, which embraces fame as a good way of life, in order to make millions. Celebrities are respected by the public and these contestants, who are normal people, dream of making themselves a well known face.
