• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

King Lear as a Tragic Hero

Extracts from this document...


King Lear as a Tragic Hero Definition Websters New Collegiate Dictionary defines tragedy as: a medieval narrative poem or tale typically describing the downfall of a great man.(1) The Tragic Hero as a Pitied Person. In his book Poetics, Aristotle told as his idea of the tragic hero. He says that by reading the tragedy, the reader should feel pity or fear about a certain character which is the tragic hero. "The change of fortune presented must not be the spectacle of a virtuous man brought from prosperity to adversity." He establishes the concept that the emotion of pity stems not from a person becoming better but when a person receives undeserved misfortune and fear comes when the misfortune befalls a man like us. This is why Aristotle points out the simple fact that, "The change of fortune should be not from bad to good, but, reversely, from good to bad."(2) Lear, as K. S. Mirsha describes him, is a towering figure, who is every inch a king. ...read more.


Being eminently good is a moral specification to the fact that he is virtuous. He still has to be to some degree good. Aristotle adds another qualification to that of being virtuous but not entirely good when he says, "He must be one who is highly renowned and prosperous." He goes on to give examples such as Oedipus and Thyestes."(4) King lear, as we can see, is not a perfect person. He is affected by the sweet words of his two eldest daughters. He also deprived, Cordelia, his youngest daughter from her right as a heir just because she was not as smooth-tongued as her sisters. Here, the imperfection of Lear is obvious, he is just a normal person who is touched by soft words. Knowing the tragic flaw of Lear, we ask ourselves: Why cannot he be a perfect person? Aristotle gives two reasons why the tragic hero cannot be perfect. First, because the misfortunes of a perfect hero would appear odious and offend our sense of justice; and secondely it would not allow action at all. ...read more.


In king Lear, Lear suffers throughout the play because of his ill judgement. He is confronted with the inhumanity of his daighter as a result of trusting them and depriving his youngest daughter of his fortune. At the end of the play Lear discovers his fault and became nearer to the reality that he was mistaken to Cordelia. This insight did not come to Lear, until he went through the bitter taste of suffering. Aristotle defines discovery as "a change from ignorance to knoledge" it may imply the identity of a person or the discovery whether someones has done or not done something. Discovery, therefore includes the revealing of the whole state of affairs, about which there was previous ignorance or mistake. Thus hamartia, peripety and discovery all go together to bring about the tragedy. Hamartia, therefore, implies the "error of ignorance".(7) Lear does not realize he has commited an error until he has suffered. This suffering is so hard for Lear that it drives him crazy. He finally realizes his mistake in giving the kingdom to his two savage daughters and disowning the one daughter who loves him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. To What Extent Can King Lear Be Described as the Tragic Hero of Shakespeares ...

    only to the wealthy and powerful but also to parents and the elderly.' It strikes me that the Elizabethan audience may be more sympathetic Lear's than a modern audience simple because his actions at the beginning of the play may not have seemed so strange to them.

  2. An Examination of the Significance of the Fool in King Lear

    In this speech, the Fool also compares Lear to the man that who was such a fool that he carried his donkey on his back in order that the donkey should not feel tired of walking over the long distance.

  1. With particular reference to Act 1, Scene 1, show how Shakespeare presents the character ...

    Once Cordelia has spoken of her anguish to the audience, an oblivious King Lear rewards his daughter Goneril for her, by giving her a large portion of his land, which he also points out on the map. It is then Regan's turn to compete in this test of love and declare her love for her father.

  2. Social injustices in King Lear

    of the same blood he refers to himself as 'illegitimate' illuminating his endless hatred of his bastardy. Edmond grasping his goals would inevitably lead to the tragedy of 'King Lear' as the nobles/royalty at the top of the social hierarchy would have to defend their divine right.

  1. If Justice is relative, depending on personal point of view, how can it be ...

    We learn that Lear does not accept flaws in his judgment as in Act 2 he protests: "I gave them all" and thus he expects to be shown their gratitude in equal measure to what he has given and sufficient respect from Goneril and Regan.

  2. The Nature of Redemption and the Limits of Pessimism in King Lear

    evil is only a momentary aberration that will be expunged by the firm but benevolent hand of divine retribution. However, such confidence is not warranted. Though understandable, Bradley?s infusion of morality into the metaphysical constitution of Shakespeare?s universe is wholly unjustified.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work