• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The level of economic development influences the quality of life Discuss

Extracts from this document...


"The level of economic development influences the quality of life" Discuss Economic development is the increase in ones standards of living within the country's population with sustained growth from a simple, low income economy to a complete opposite, high-income economy. Quality of life is very difficult to define because individuals have different perceptions but it's the social and psychological condition of people arising from their everyday life. So in other words is someone who is wealthy and has everything they need happy? If a person's quality of life is improved for example if they went from having no water or no shelter over their heads to having clean drinking water and a roof over their head, you would expect them to be a lot happier with their lives. ...read more.


GNI in Bangladesh is $1980 pc (180th in the world),China is $5530 pc (129th in the world), Japan is $30'040 pc (19th in the world) Development cable is one way of measuring Quality of Life and it could tell us if with economic development comes a better quality of life, for example if they have all the 5 main elements of the cable which are Demographic (Life expectancy, Birth/Death Control, Mobility, Personal Wealth), Social (Equal opportunities, Satisfaction), Cultural (Education, Culture, Identity), Environmental (Sustainability), Political (Freedom of Speech, Democratic government) If they have these then their Quality of life should rise. ...read more.


But with economic development comes many benefits that could increase a country's quality of life such as: * Increased access to education and higher rates of adult literacy. * The Wider provision of health services, safe water and sewage disposal * More food security So in general a better-developed country would have a much better quality of life as they will have the basic standards of living to be able to survive and they would be happy that they had these. Or you could look at it and think that now you have the basics in life, you want the luxuries and you could be unhappy that you don't have these, so we could become an over demanding society where we always seek for the next best thing. 21/09/2010 08:47 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Population & Settlement section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Population & Settlement essays

  1. Does quality of life increase as one moves away from CBD of Swansea?

    Unsurprisingly, the housing layout and design received a poor and unimaginative mark, since nearly all of the housing built in this area is made up of council houses. This can be seen in figure 9, drab and uninteresting houses do not rank highly in the quality of life evaluation.

  2. World Development

    The MEDC'S and LEDC'S have a big gap and its an undignified imbalance. The MEDC'S have high standard of permanent residence, and indoor qualities supplying electricity, water supply and sewage systems. Although LEDC'S don't have adequate or suitable shelter or either any permanent residence.

  1. Why was Malthus wrong about Japan?

    In reality Japan was much more akin to England in terms of its demography than China. Malthus was wrong in this case as well. He presumed Japan to be dissimilar to European countries and because of its locality in relation to China, to be much more alike it neighbouring country.

  2. Rural development: Strategy for incorporating it into India's overall economic development agenda.

    Introduction India Shining, but only 30 %. Even though the NDA government did good work there's no disputing the fact that India can't develop into a modern economy while 300 million people subsist on less than $1 a day. The middle and upper classes thrived as growth averaged 6.2% annually in the 1990s.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work