• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why either the environmental or the economic effects of hazards vary spatially.

Extracts from this document...


Explain why either the environmental or the economic effects of hazards vary spatially. The economic effects of a hazard include its effects on the wealth, industry and employment of a country. I am structuring this essay so three different hazards will be explored in both an MEDC and an LEDC. The economic effects of each case study will be examined, to establish the extent and severity of the economic damage and the major cause of this. It is expected that the more vulnerable nations, due to their lack of wealth, will suffer a large economic impact from a hazard event due to a lack of preparedness. A more wealthy country is likely to have more advanced technology and the ability for more accurate hazard prediction, and therefore suffer less damage to the economy. Due to the north, south divide nature of economically and less economically developed countries, it is expected that the southern hemisphere will experience the majority of severe disasters with large economic impacts in particular at plate boundaries. ...read more.


20 000 people died, and 40 000 people were left homeless, this is significantly due to the badly constructed buildings. Few buildings were earthquake proof, as they were poorly constructed out of poor-quality materials and therefore could not withstand the earthquake. The area worse hit was part of Turkey's industrial heartland, which suffered greatly and therefore would have had a detrimental effect on the country's economy. Disruption occurred mostly within small companies, as many shopkeepers were unable to re open for business as many former customers migrated to less earthquake prone regions. Following this the mayor of Izmit (the epicentre region) declared the area in economic crisis due to the lack of productivity. The death toll of the Kobe earthquake Japan 1995 was considerably less than that of the turkey earthquake at 6000 fatalities. Due to the fact that Japan is an MEDC there are more finances available and therefore the economic impact of the disaster is less than in turkey. ...read more.


Large settlements in the south, for example Plymouth with a population of about 4000 had to evacuated, and 1200 people left the island since the eruption. The affected area was largely agricultural, due to the fertile soil around the volcano, and the eruption totally disrupted production affecting the islands ability to trade and therefore their economy. The huge loss of population from the island also had a detrimental effect on the economy. It can be seen that LEDCs tend to suffer a greater economic impact due to their lack of preparedness to there hazard events, whereas MEDCs in most cases suffer less economic loss due to the fact they have the funds to provide protection, for example secure earthquake proof buildings. This is the general pattern however other factors must be taken into account for example land use, in turkey the area affected by the earthquake was the "industrial heartland" and so the effects of this earthquake would have been significantly lower had it struck an agricultural area. Duration and magnitude of the hazard also need to be taken into account when comparing the economic impacts of hazards spatially. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. "The Impacts of Natural Hazards include Social, Economic and environmental effects" Discuss this statement ...

    Also many would be tourists would have been shocked at the Sumatra governments handling of the quake who seemed to rely more on international aid agencies than handle the disaster themselves. This might have put of tourists as, along fearing the unpredictable nature of earthquakes, the government's inability to protect them in the event of another disaster.

  2. What is an environmental (natural) hazard?

    Trying to deal with it afterwards, after all the effects have happened and the area is devastated, many people are killed or injured, buildings and livelihoods have been lost, means that the costs are always going to be that much greater and it will take longer and longer to get back to normality, if at all.

  1. With Reference To At Least Two Case Studies, One Each From An MEDC and ...

    times the displacement for three times longer.4 Figure 25: A map of Armenia showing the epicentre of the 1988 earthquake. The collapse of buildings and structures is responsible for the majority of deaths, injuries and economic losses resulting from an earthquake.

  2. What are the variations in the effects and responses to volcanic activity between LEDCs ...

    Traces of ash from the May 18th eruption were recorded two weeks later back in Washington State. Trees blown down: 4 billion board feet of timber (enough to build about 300,000 two-bedroom homes) Human fatalities: 57 Wildlife: The Washington State Department of Game estimated nearly 7,000 big game animals (deer, elk, and bear)

  1. Suggest why droughts have severe impacts on people and the environment.

    Droughts obviously have serious hydrological effects. The main one being lower water levels in rivers, reservoirs, lakes and ponds, which leads on to cause other issues, linked with animals and providing plant roots with water to mention a few. This links with the quality of the water becoming worse, this can include, a change in salt concentrations, increase in water temperature and a change in PH.

  2. Explain Why the Economic Effects of Hazards Vary Spatially

    However, there are complex reasons why people stay in these areas, one of the reasons is because hazards are unpredictable and the magnitude and frequency cannot be forecast. Also the social and political constraints cannot be avoided, so these people have to stay in these hazard prone areas.

  1. To what extent is the human response to hazards affected by variations in economic ...

    ad been formulated in order to rescue and help the injured or buried. This inevitably lead to more death, as emergency aid was unable to reach those worse affected by the natural hazard. "The historic quarter of Bam has been completely destroyed and many of our countrymen are underneath the ruins," said Mohammad Ali Karimi, the governor of Kerman province.

  2. The focus of this paper will be the Queen Charlotte Islands earthquake of 1949.

    earthquakes and undoubtedly not possible to specify the exact date, time and location prior to their occurrence (Ludwin). Nevertheless, a great amount of research is being conducted to expand dependable methods of prediction. Since forecasting future events is, for seismologists, fascinating and also their ultimate goal, a "striking progress" has been made in earthquake prediction in recent years (Mogi).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work