• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the reasons why the USA reacted strongly to Castro(TM)s revolution in Cuba.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the reasons why the USA reacted strongly to Castro's revolution in Cuba. When Fidel Castro replaced the pro-American Fulgencio Batista as leader of Cuba in 1959, many Americans were alarmed. A revolutionary movement had displaced a loyal dictator only 80 miles from the US mainland. Although many American business interests were threatened by Castro's promises to rule Cuba for Cuban interests rather than American one, there was no indicator at this stage that Cuba would become the source of superpower rivalry which threatened the World with nuclear war. The sheer proximity of Cuba to the USA was a crucial factor in American concern about the direction taken by Castro. There was a fear that Cuba would become a model of anti-American authority in the Western Hemisphere and the lessons learned in Havana would be copied throughout Central and South America. The 1825 Monroe Doctrine stated that no part of the Americas should fall under foreign domination, America's greatest fear was that Cuba could provide a platform for communism and Soviet influence on their own doorstep. ...read more.


The most notorious example of US over-reaction was the Bay of Pigs in April 1961 when CIA backed Cuban exiles invaded Cuba but, due to a failure of US air and naval support, were easily captured or killed. This was a major setback for Kennedy at the start of his term of office, especially as the Soviets had achieved the first Cosmonaut in space in the same month. The Bay of Pigs convinced Castro of the need for further Soviet support, defensive military aid as well as economic assistance. It was the placing of offensive nuclear weapons on Cuba in 1962 which evoked the strongest reaction from Washington. Here SS-4 and SS-5 missiles were placed within range of all major US cities, when they were identified on 16 October, Kennedy formed ExComm to discuss the level of US response to the threat placed on the USA by missiles so close to their shores. Even though Soviet ICBM's could provide just as much of a threat, and the USA had missiles on the Soviet border in Turkey, the perception of having nuclear warheads so close to home alarmed the US Government and public. ...read more.


Both Kennedy and Khrushchev were unwilling to take the decision to make the Cuban issue one resolved by nuclear exchange. Had more aggressive forces within ExComm been allowed to launch a surgical strike or an invasion then the outcome could have been devastating. In public, the perception was one of success for the US in October 1962, but Castro would remain in place to present an alternative to US domination in the Americas, with Soviet backing. In many respects the US precipitated the crisis in 1962 as a result of earlier hostility shown towards Castro. The US believed it needed to act strongly against Cuba in order to prove its dominance in its own sphere of influence and to ensure the US public that it was not losing the Cold War. Miscalculations about Castro's initial intentions forced Cuba into Soviet hands and through the Bay of Pigs led to the placing of offensive nuclear weapons on Cuba. The presence of these weapons was intolerable to US interests and resulted in the strongest reaction in order to show the US could stand up to Soviet encroachment in the Cold War, especially in its own back yard. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Bay of Pigs Invasion

    They rationalized that if the invasion succeeded, it would be "self-legitimizing" if Castro were run out of office and a new Cuba came to being. However, they were troubled by what they were doing, and what exactly the subsequent procedures would be (Lasky 518).

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

    it had the reputation.xli This was also a major negative effect however, as the US was worried that it might be seen as weak, indecisive, and incapable of defending itself. This is because people would get the impression that the US refused to act when confronted with a threat.

  1. The American Revolution

    (124) These attempts to lower debt and pay for the remaining British security garrisons on the western frontier were very effective in their primary role, but they were also very effective at igniting a new level of anti-English fervor in the colonies.

  2. History of Cuba

    In 1940, a new constitution was adopted. Also, Batista Ran was elected for president. In 1941, Cuba joined World War II on the Allied side. The United States had naval and air stations in Cuba during the war. Grau was elected president again in 1944, when Batista retired.

  1. Was the Soviet Union justified in putting missiles in Cuba?

    It was certain though; by placing missiles on Cuba that Khrushchev would have the upper hand in negotiations relating to the cold war. Also Khrushchev claimed that 'the missiles were placed merely to deter the Americans from invading Cuba'. (Timewatch Missile - Crisis)

  2. why did a crisis develop over cuba in 1962

    A profit that is made is the reward for their work. Capitalism also follows the belief of opportunity for all and average standard of living higher then under communism, but a wide spread between rich and poor. America also had a free economy, Americans had a choice of many parties for government, which would be chosen by the people democratically.

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    the defeat of its wartime adversaries had been accomplished. There were meetings between the parties but little of substance was achieved, and more often than not these meetings would degenerate into accusatorial exchanges. There was no doubt that the power of the " bomb" was in many ways a show of American strength, to the Soviet Union, one that was noted accordingly.

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    source of much needed cash and positive prospects for further trade and increased sales and revenue. Economic gains and common sense simply outweigh any risk of political pressure or possible loss of financial support from the U.S. As Duma member Vladimir Averichev has remarked, "We are in so deep an

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work