• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparing and Contrasting The Lives Of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. And Malcolm X

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Whitney O?Brien Lord English 112-015 ________________ African Americans are privileged to have had leaders who fought for a difference in Black America. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X are two powerful men in particular who brought hope to Blacks in the United States. Both preached the same message about Blacks having power and strength in the midst of all the hatred that surrounded them. Even though they shared the same dream of equality for their people, the tactics they implied to make these dreams a reality were very diverse. The background, environment and philosophy of both men were largely responsible for the distinctly varying responses to American racism. Martin Luther King Jr. was born into a middle classed family on January 15th 1929. His Birth paper stated his name as Michael Luther King but he later had it changed to Martin. He was one of three children born to Martin Luther King Sr. the pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church, and Alberta King, a former schoolteacher. Malcolm X on the other hand, was born Malcolm Little on May 19, 1925 into a poor family. He was one of the eight children born to Louise Norton Little, a homemaker and Earl Little, an outspoken Baptist minister and avid supporter of Black Nationalist leader Marcus Garvey. ...read more.

Middle

Malcolm X was full of hate, anger, and vengeance. He was a dark presence, an angry, cynical, implacable man whose good will or forgiveness or even pity the white race could neither earn nor buy. "Coffee," he once remarked in an interview, "is the only thing I like integrated." He also pleasantly mentioned that whites were inherently enemies of the Negroes and that integration was impossible without great bloodletting. Nonviolence was as he put it, "a mealy-mouth, beg-in, wait-in, plead-in kind of action," and it was only a device for disarming the blacks. He also believed that everything we had heard to the contrary from the Martin Luther Kings and the Roy Wilkins? and the Whitney Young?s was a deadly dangerous pack of lies. "That's etiquette," he said. "Etiquette means to blend in with society. They are being polite. The average Negro doesn't even let another Negro know what he thinks, he's so mistrusting. I'm black first- my whole objectives are black, my allegiance is black. By me being a Muslim, I'm not interested in American, because America has never been interested in me. He married Betty X Sanders on January 14th 1958. Both Malcolm X and King spread their views through assertive, hard-hitting, powerful speeches. Nevertheless, their intentions were delivered in different styles and purposes. ...read more.

Conclusion

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X shared a similar dream. A dream that one day their people would be able to be free from the bondage of prejudice and racism, in which they were held captive. They are remembered as martyrs who fought for the cause of Black America, and who gave hope to their people in times of desperate struggle. They were individuals who were ahead of their time and who died prematurely, working for a goal yet to be achieved. Two separate people both fighting for one main cause. The goal of equality and justice among all races. I honestly would have to say after reviewing the lives of both men I identify more with the teachings of Dr. King. It was not just his peaceful nature of going about his protests but certain lines in his speeches reside with me as an individual today. Two such quotes being, ?Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter?, and ?Let no man pull you low enough to hate him?. Even though I identify more with Dr. King both men will be seen as heroes for many generations to come and will continue to inspire me and others to fight for what we believe, because at the end of the day it is not the color of your skin that counts but your character. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    It was social improvement, not desegregation that many supporters of Black Power wanted. During Johnson's presidency, the government was more willing to accept limited change but with the election of Nixon, the government lost its vigour in tackling the domestic problems of racism and social degradation in black ghettos; something which further fuelled support for Black Power.

  2. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    five known manuscripts differ in some small detail, and the scripts written by Lincoln also differ slightly. The version I have chosen to use is known as the 'Bliss' version. It was written by Lincoln after the speech, and is viewed by many as the standard text.

  1. Martin Luther King. Martin was one of Americas greatest civil rights activists, shaping ...

    you, pray for them that use you badly.? The Parable of the Prodigal Son is a Christian teaching about forgiveness. There is a strong belief in repentance, and how forgiveness allows a person to change positively. Christian teachings on love and forgiveness also explain Martin?s philosophy on non-violence.

  2. What was the short term significance of Martin Luther King after the March on ...

    also played a big part in reducing overall racial discrimination due to that fact the majority of the American population where white. So by getting them to sympathise with the cause, more relevant changes such as the civil rights bill would have been made, proving how after the march on Washington, Kings short term significance was overwhelmingly obvious.

  1. Civil Rights background to 1950. Marcus garvey, A. Philip Randolph and "the Great ...

    In 1941, he, Bayard Rustin, and A. J. Muste proposed a march on Washington to protest racial discrimination in war industries and to propose the desegregation of the American Armed forces. The march was cancelled after President of the United States Franklin D.

  2. Critical Review on The Assasination of Malcolm X based on three articles from The ...

    Terms related to the Black Muslims were almost synonymous with Malcolm X because of his powerful role in the organization and because of the strong beliefs linked specifically with both Malcolm and the Black Muslims. Black Muslims, and thus Malcolm X, were characterized as extremists within the media.

  1. How far can Malcolm X be seen as the key individual in contributing to ...

    Malcolm also stated that equality and freedom should be attained "by any means necessary"3 suggesting violence and approval of a potential race war. Furthermore his radical political viewsmay have added racial tension in America. On the other hand Malcolm could be seen as "catalyst to the cause"4.

  2. What was the short term significance of Malcolm X?

    So it is evident that Malcolm's influence never contributed towards the legal desegregation attained. Furthermore Malcolm's tactic of adopting violence proved ineffective, for example the 1965 watts riots which resulted from the government's decision to block the equal housing components from the civil rights act.In the report they acknowledged racial

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work