• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Perkin Warbeck remained a threat to the security of Henry VII for so many years.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain why Perkin Warbeck remained a threat to the security of Henry VII for so many years. Perkin Warbeck was the second Yorkist pretender to the English throne after Lambert Simnel was defeated at the Battle of Stoke in 1487. Between the years 1491-99, he posed a significantly destabilising threat to Henry VII in dynastic terms, impersonating Richard of York, the younger son of Edward IV. The successes of Warbeck, which led him to remain a threat to the King's security, may be largely categorised into the support from foreign powers during this period and discontent existing in England due to Henry's methods of ruling with relation to sustaining an authoritative and respected status both within his own country and abroad. Whilst it is possible to challenge such a concept of a threat, Warbeck was eventually executed in November 1499, demonstrating in a modern context that the King's perception of this pretender was one of great concern for his position. Steven Gunn has suggested that 'Henry was a usurper and carried with him the problems of this title'. ...read more.

Middle

Hence this crisis was much more serious, for Henry was unable to prove the existence of the true Richard and if Warbeck truly was the prince he impersonated, his claim to the English throne would have been superior to that of Henry. The threat of Warbeck was enlarged by the context in which it occurred - those behind the pretender were able to follow a potentially fatal method by which Henry's position could be destabilised. In order to ascertain why any pretender to the throne would become a prolonged threat, the nature of the monarch's rule must be evaluated. The view of Steven Gunn could be expanded upon to maintain that Henry's rule naturally had characteristics of that of a usurper: unlike a hereditary monarch, he required more stringent methods of discipline to enforce his position as a ruler. In addition to passing attainders against those involved with the pretenders (Edmund de la Pole was fined �5000 to inherit some of his brother's lands and never inherited the dukedom of Suffolk for his involvement with Simnel) ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in this respect, it must be noted that the threat was not Warbeck as an individual, but rather the concept of the proceedings and those supporting him. He became a focus for French discontent with Henry VII in the same way that he had been a Yorkist focus in England. A prolonged threat from any pretender to any throne can always be attributed to discontent with a monarch's rule. Conformingly, Perkin Warbeck was often able to exploit this to enlist support and increase opposition to the King. It is clear that the level of foreign support given to the pretender ultimately was the greatest contributing factor in threatening Henry's security due to the possibility of a successful invasion, though the paranoia and the methods of rule enlisted to secure his dynasty were equal factors in causing Warbeck to remain a threat. In contrast, it is very significant that Warbeck was never a primary threat as an individual, but merely a strong secondary threat behind the foreign powers and nobility that supported him - it was the concept that destabilised the position of Henry VII. ?? ?? ?? ?? History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Who was the greater threat to Henry VII's throne, Lambert Simnel or Perkin Warbeck?

    This was one of the more important points of the rebellion as someone else actually held the same title as Henry and this will have no doubt have put a strain on his position in power of the country. Warbeck had no suck power over Henry in his Rebellion even though he had married into the Scottish royal family.

  2. Essay: How serious was the Yorkist threat to Henry VII?

    The most notorious was the Earl of Kildare. After gaining Irish support from several aristocracy, they moved onto the low counties, where again Margaret of Burgundy, who was Edwards IVs sister helped the Yorkists in trying to overthrown Henry by welcoming Simnel into her court and tutored him further into his 'part'.

  1. Were the pretenders a serious threat to Henry VII's throne?

    However, he only got limited support from the Irish lords, and none at all from the Earl of Kildiare, a very influential figure.

  2. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    vote, it is clear that this was never going to be a huge issue for Elizabeth, as the wiser amongst the Puritan leaders realised that resigning over Parker's advertisements would simply allow the Catholics in, which would deny them further chance for reform later on in the reign.

  1. How serious a threat did the pretenders pose to Henry VII's crown?

    Lincoln was killed on the battlefield and Lovell either escaped or was killed, as he was never seen again. Symonds the fire-starter of the plot was sentenced to life imprisonment in a Bishop's prison, Henry had to abide by the laws of the Church on the grounds that Symonds was a Priest.

  2. How Secure was Henry VII?

    He was captured and admitted the whole story and was imprisoned. In 1499 he and the Earl of Warwick were hanged for plotting against the king. This was much more of a serious threat of Henry, we can see this by the way he acted, In 1493 Phillip assumed control

  1. Was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    left alive after the Wars in order to avoid noblemen rallying to them and thus plunging England in yet another civil war. Although Henry had married Elizabeth of York, therefore mingling the blood of the red and white roses, there still remained men who had an arguably more legitimate claim to the throne than he did.

  2. How Successful was Edward Carson in His Defense of Unionism During The Third Home ...

    view that even if he did, Unionists would still be opposed to the bill and that Nationalists like Redmond would be disaffected. The opposition had more reason to be worried, if they supported it they would be accused of deserting southern unionists, given that the party line was to reject

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work