• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful than those who opposed the communist regime from 1917 to 1964.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful than those who opposed the communist regime from 1917 to 1964. Throughout the 1855-1964 period, opposition remained a constant threat to both communist and tsarist Governments. Opposition was largely unsuccessful throughout the period, only fully uniting in the February Revolution, an important turning point in the development of the Russian state that did not occur under communist. Several other factors including loyalty of the army, the varying degrees of control and terror towards the masses meant that opponents of the Tsars were more successful than those who opposed the communist regime. The army was an integral part of the Russian state throughout the 1855-1964 period, considerable continuity can be found in how Russian rulers used the army in dealing with opponents. When there was a rebellion in Hungary in 1955, Khrushchev sent in the army to crush it, the same course of action had been taken to crush the Polish revolt in 1861. Lenin used military force against the Green armies of the peasantry in the Civil War and the army had also been heavily employed under Alexander II, with military force being deployed 185 times between 1855-60 alone. ...read more.

Middle

The secret police were continually used throughout the period, and the lack of success opposition enjoyed under Alexander III in particular is in direct relation to the intensity of repression seen under the Okhrana - in contrast to the other Tsars of the period who were more relaxed. Whereas the Tsars had only identified existing threats, the communists targeted potential threats. The KGB continued many aspects of Tsarist repression which had been heavily intensified by the Cheka, which allowed Stalin to remove all traces of opposition including Zinoviev, Kamenev and the exiled Trotsky. Under the communists, new elements of control which were not present in Tsarist Russia sprang up. Millions of informants helped identify potential threats which reduced the effectiveness of opposition, and the workers were under much closer scrutiny. Discipline in the workplace had increased severely under Lenin and in addition to continuing this, the 5 year plans brought with them GOSPLAN and communal housing which allowed the regime to further control the workers, whose role was key to the success of the 1917 revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

In contrast to the February Revolution where opponents had united and succeeded, the white armies during the Civil War were divided to such an extent that Lenin was able to defend his revolution. Stalin's Kulak purges were not met with high resistance because not all peasants shared the same vision as the Kulaks, and in a similar fashion Lenin was able to crush the Kronstadt rebellion. The lack of unity in mainstream politics is another reason why opponents to the communists were less successful than opponents to the tsars. In contrast to Nicholas II who was forced to abdicate as there was widespread opposition to him, Stalin was able to eliminate opponents in the Politburo one by one and maintain power. In conclusion, opponents to the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful than those who opposed the communist regime post 1917. The Tsarist regime only sought to eliminate existing threats which allowed some opponents to remain undetected, this was not the case under the communists. Similarly, the increase in repression seen under the communists had eliminated any trace of opposition, whereas Tsarist repression had merely aggravated opposition, resulting in the February Revolution which removed them from power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Although Service claims that Lenin was more ruthless than originally percieved, particularly as he crushed his enemies, waged class warfare and had unpleasant attitudes towards peasants and the Church. However Service also claims that Lenin ultimately wanted to abolish the secret police, the army and eventually the whole state.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    Stolypin had succeeded in creating an enterprising class of peasants, however they would be heavily persecuted under Stalin and any improvement to their lives had been undone by the communists. The peasantry also faced a high level of repression and persecution throughout the period.

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    Perhaps it was this more extreme approach to ruling Russia which Lenin had feared when he said he did not trust Stalin, and perhaps this is why the ideology of Lenin - Leninism - was still followed many years later whereas Stalin's support was lost.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    He had been forced to leave because of news of a plot, led by the royalist Malet, against him. Malet tried to set up a provisional government before he was dealt with. 10. As the French regained order in retreat, only 25,000 of the Grande Armee had survived.

  1. Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period ...

    The Polish Revolt in 1863 was easily crushed by the Russian military, and in 1956 the Hungary Rebellion fared the same. This was not merely a continual display of failure but also showed how important the army was to the state.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    Nazi anti-clerical campaign in 1936-7 = opposition Army = no threat to Hitler. Leading officers, even if they disliked Nazi rule, shared many of its aims. Hitler didn't trust the old guard generals = 1938 removed War minister Blomberg and Commander in Chief Fritsch C.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Stalin still managed to become head of the communist party after a big struggle for power with another person high up in the communist party called Trotsky. Stalin managed however to persuade the rest of the communist party that he was the rightful leader after Lenin.

  2. The survival of the tsars regime in Russia between 1906 and 1914 was due ...

    By doctoring the electoral system, the 3rd Duma in 1907 had more deputies from moderate parties. This meant the tsar would have a more cooperative Duma which allowed him to secure his power. Stolypin was appointed President of Council of Ministers in July 1906 and like Witte, was dedicated to strengthening tsardom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work