• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did Foreign Aid Contribute to Franco's success in the Spanish Civil War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far did Foreign Aid Contribute to Franco's success in the Spanish Civil War? Francesca Blythe The Spanish Civil War lasted from 1936 to 1939 and cost the lives of about 2 million people. It is often viewed at a mini World War 2, Communists vs. Fascists. It resulted in victory for Franco, who then ruled Spain as "El Gaudillo" until his death in 1975. One of the most decisive factors in the Nationalists victory was German and Italian military aid. Mussolini supported the Nationalists as he claimed that he was "not prepared to see the establishment of a communist state" in Spain, however it is more likely that he realised the strategic advantage a right wing regime in Spain would give, as well as provide a place for testing weapons and strategies. Hitler gave many different reasons for helping Franco, that the war would allow German rearmament to carry on unnoticed, to prevent the spread of communism, to obtain much needed Spanish iron ore and to provide an ally for submarine bases. Both Hitler and Mussolini gave their aid only to Franco, so as to avoid conflicts between the generals. ...read more.

Middle

"The frictions in the Republic reached boiling point several times, with a large scale fighting taking place in Barcelona between the anarchists and Republican government in May 1937 and a civil war within a civil war erupting in the Republic in the last few weeks of the war." The Republican armies were often poorly equipped and poorly disciplined, it was only the introduction of Soviet technicians that started to train the military properly, and ideological differences often hindered their efforts. This was especially the case when training the anarchists who often refused to dig trenches or use maps as they believed it cowardly yet who would often flee under heavy shelling or bombardment. The Republics main source of aid was the USSR, which also resulted in it being tied to it ideologically, with the communist party receiving orders often direct from Moscow. Russian aid was of a much higher quality than German or Italian aid, for example in the first use of Russian arms, one T26 destroyed 11 Italian tanks, however this was due to their well trained Russian operators, Spaniards operated them with much less success. The dependence of the Republic on the USSR for aid and the propaganda of the Nationalists portraying the Republic as "Red" prevented other countries from ...read more.

Conclusion

As well as his desire to create a "fight to the death" war. For the Nationalists terror was part of their campaign. "It is borne in mind that are action will need to be very violent in order to crush a strong and well organised enemy as soon as possible." (General Mola) However it is hard to assess the effect of terror as a weapon of war. At first it may have stiffened Republican resistance, but later, when their morale was lower, contributed to defeatism. It is difficult to draw definite conclusions however, the outcome of the war was massively promoted by interventions of foreign states, in the first place by the military support of Germany and Italy, secondly by the appeasement-policy of France and Great Britain and thirdly by the anti-anarchistic attitude of Russia. But if the Republicans had been stronger and more of a united body would the outcome still have been the same? I think the reasons for Franco's success were due to the vast amounts of foreign aid complemented by the weakness of the Republic. Without the aid it may not have been such a "walkover". 1 The Encyclopaedia Britannica ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    Moreover, Germany and Italy did not play the most important role. Britain and the United States also played a major role in the Spanish Civil War just as Germany and Italy. Britain, by creating and signing the Non-Intervention Committee, avoided other country from supporting the Republicans who then lacked of weapons and troops to fight against the Nationalists.

  2. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    The Western powers also disagreed with the Kadets' motto as they did not have much interest in helping to build a united Russia, preferring to keep that vast country weak after WW1. Hence, support from the Allies was half-hearted and although they sent �100 million worth of supplies at the

  1. The success of the Nationalist cause in the Spanish Civil War was due primarily ...

    The importance of this act of intervention in holding the initiative shouldn't be underestimated. "...Franco's "Army of Africa", (was) composed of foreign legionnaires and Moorish mercenaries - perhaps the blood-thirstiest and certainly one of the most professionalised troops at the disposal of any European nation at the time..."3 Within two

  2. American Civil War (1861-1865).

    Grant whipped it into shape and by September 1861, he had risen to the rank of brigadier general of volunteers. He sought to win control of the Mississippi Valley. In February 1862 he took Fort Henry and attacked Fort Donnellson.

  1. platoon vs jarhead

    It doesn't matter which war is being fought, where the location is, or even what time period you're in. Both these films show a mentally challenging war and don't really focus on the physical warfare. This maybe because America actually lost these wars, The Vietnam war and the 1st Gulf war and they consider them their worst defeats in history.

  2. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    to be involved with the Bolshevik regime, but the opposite occurred and many countries peeled away and established independence like Ukraine.

  1. ‘In origins andoutcome, the Spanish Civil War was a Spanish and not a European ...

    organised under Manuel Anzana. 'The popular front was only some 150,000 votes ahead out of nearly 10 million cast'8. The Spanish electorate was virtually split down the middle, and the leftist Popular Front coalition scarcely overcame rightist parties. Traditional Spain rejected the Cortes and began to assign an extra-parliamentary campaign.

  2. The Spanish Civil War

    Franco also publicly kissed the Monarchist red and yellow flag at a rally in Seville in August 1936 at the Feast of the Assumption, thus appealing to the monarchists, it was at this speech that the movement first started to be portrayed as a 'holy crusade' rather than solely a political struggle.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work