• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In mid 19th century, Abraham Lincoln's three speeches mirrored the changes in his ideals and themes throughout the Civil War from a political view to a more spiritual level.

Extracts from this document...


In mid 19th century, Abraham Lincoln's three speeches mirrored the changes in his ideals and themes throughout the Civil War from a political view to a more spiritual level. In Lincoln's "House Divided" speech, he rhetorically illustrated the North's concern about morality of slavery, the preservation of the Union, and the increased and conflicted demands of the South. For example, Lincoln exemplified the immoral changes in Negro rights through the actions of the Supreme Court, Senator Douglas, and President Buchanan that coincidentally set the country in motion toward legalized slavery. They established three drastic changes that denied Negroes citizenship, permitted slavery in United States territories, and prohibited Negroes from appearing in United States courts. Lincoln then revealed that these political leaders corruptibly cheated the Negroes of their rights by cooperating together in order to establish a "niche, for the Dred Scot decision...and [declared] the perfect freedom of the [Negroes], to be just no freedom at all." Furthermore, Lincoln affirmed that a division in the government will only weaken its infrastructure by stating, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." In light of failed compromises, Lincoln then explained that the increased tensions over slavery are an inherent flaw in the political system when he said, "I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free." ...read more.


Lincoln realized that both sides of the Civil War had a common belief that their side was righteous and that they prayed to the same God for different reasons. He then concluded that "the prayers of both could not be answered," and that one would be vindicated in their beliefs for the war and one would not. Furthermore, he then prayed to God in his speech in hopes that they were on God's side and that their fight for liberty, freedom, and justice was justified in God's eyes. He asked God "to give us to see the right, let us strive on and finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds." These words showed that Lincoln wanted to see the right that would lead to greater goodness for the country and with the help of God to be able to end the war. Finally, Lincoln said, "The judgments of the Lord are true at the righteous altogether." This statement explained that any events that occur only happen due to God's belief that they should arise. Thus, Lincoln affirmed that the certainty of war could not be forestalled and that only through God's support in the rightful winner would the war end. ...read more.


Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted his freedom. Taney -- a staunch supporter of slavery and intent on protecting southerners from northern aggression -- wrote in the Court's majority opinion that, because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, he wrote, believed that blacks "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever profit could be made by it." Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, "all men are created equal," Taney reasoned that "it is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . ." Abolitionists were incensed. Although disappointed, Frederick Douglass, found a bright side to the decision and announced, "my hopes were never brighter than now." For Douglass, the decision would bring slavery to the attention of the nation and was a step toward slavery's ultimate destruction. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    On a more positive note, however, the Supreme Court once again came to the forefront of federal government action to aid African Americans to gain their civil rights. The Browder v. Gayle case, which came about because of the Montgomery Bus Boycotts, as led by Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King.

  2. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    The contrast between 'joyous daybreak' and long night' emphasizes the difference between being free and in captivity, as the positive and negative language is so different. 'Long night' also indicates they have been captive for too long. These balanced statements lend weight to his argument.

  1. Was there any truth in the Southern claim that slavery was both a benign ...

    The competition provided by slave labour also caused decreased wages for white indentured servants or freed slaves. It is debatable whether or not slavery was profitable for the Southern economy as a whole. Initially, slaves gave better labour on rice, indigo and tobacco plantations than white indentured servants did, making

  2. To what extent do you agree with Abraham Lincoln that slavery was 'somehow the ...

    In the 1940s revisionist view the historians argue that they would have eventually reached a compromise. If the North and South reached a compromise over slavery then there would have been no need for a war. The historians also mention that it was extremists on both side that caused the war such as fire eaters and rabble rousing abolitionists.

  1. A face to remember

    that pushed the act on congress to have president Carter sign the legislation to have a memorial for the Vietnam Veterans in Washington D.C. These veterans had no idea about architecture; thus, they hired a jury of top design professionals that consisted of two architectures, two landscapers, two people who

  2. The effects of immigration into the US in the 19th Century.

    Even though immigration made the economy rise and the unemployment rates go down; some people at that time were against immigration. They were convinced that the new immigrants were taking their jobs away. This caused some resentment of the new immigrants.

  1. Describe Wilsons Fourteen points, Why did Congress fail to ratify the Peace Settlement?

    Wilson, instead of trying to convince Representatives and Senators to vote for the treaty, went on a tour around the country to build support, but he suffered a stroke that left him partly paralyzed and the trip was in vain.

  2. Research on the major Civil rights events between 1963 to 1968

    However, the talks were wrecked by the bombing of the house that belonged to King?s brother. King?s motel room was also bombed. These outrages provoked riots among the local African-American community. The SCLC had gauged Connor correctly. Had he behaved in an 'Albany manner', Birmingham would have been much less of a success.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work