• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Parliament was of little importance in the government of England" - How valid is this view in the years 1525 to 1566?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Parliament was of little importance in the government of England" How valid is this view in the years 1525 to 1566? Pre reformation parliaments had shown healthy institutional growth and had succeeded in achieving cooperation with the monarch. However during the middle reign of Henry viii was a period known as the parliaments of the reformation, although occasionally called upon they did prove to be of importance in the running of the country through government. The beginning of this phase was due to the annulment with Catherine of Aragon and his infatuation with Anne Boleyn. During this period of 1529-1536 the reformation parliament only met on seven occasions. Henry's relationship with parliament was of great significance to the achievements of the parliament. Henry ruthlessly increased the power of royal government, using parliament to sanction his actions. Henry ruled through powerful ministers who like his six wives were never safe in their positions. His greatest achievement was to initiate the protestant reformation in England. He rejected the authority of the pope and the Roman Catholic Church, confiscated church lands, and promoted religious reformers to power. Beginning in 1529, Henry used parliament to exert pressure on the pope. Claiming that they were correcting abuses, the reformation parliament voted to ban payments from English bishops to Rome and to end the independence of the English clergy. Previously the clergy had owed allegiance only to the pope. ...read more.

Middle

He established separate departments of state, with their own collectors, secretaries, and judges, to receive the wealth confiscated from the church. These courts, as they were called, were able to resolve disputes quickly and prevented the traditional royal courts from being overburdened with cases. Cromwell served as the effective head of Henry's government for eight years and he was left alone to run it. After the civil wars of the preceding century that had weakened the monarchy, Henry viii re-established the power of the English crown. This was done largely through the work of his powerful ministers Wolsey and Cromwell. They made use of the new Privy Council and parliament, whose members included the aristocracy and gentry. As these groups were brought into government, their individual ability to challenge the king diminished. The confiscation of church wealth enabled Henry's heirs to rule without new revenues for the rest of the century. In 1547 Edward succeeded his father as king of England, with his reign brought a decrease in royal authority, of which Henry had greatly established during his reign. Through Edwards reign and indeed his sisters, Mary, the government during this time dictated the religious course in England. A protestant reformation under Edward and a papal-Catholic restoration in Mary's reign. People like the Protector Somerset and the Duke of Northumberland participated in moderate to radical reform, as well as the Marian reaction. All of which were enacted by the authority of the parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

Forgery and perjury were also attacked; the court also punished subornation of perjury which another act of 1563 deemed a misdemeanour when committed in cases concerning lands, goods, debts or damages in any court of record. This was seen as a legal landmark as the act enforced higher standards in the central courts and in locally at assizes the quarter sessions as well as in the ecclesiastical courts. Parliamentary importance in government ranged from low to high during the Tudor reign between 1525 to 1566. Henry viii succeeded in a successful parliament and government due to great councillors such as Wolsey and Cromwell. The relations between Henry and his parliament were unique; he took great interest in the progress of the parliament. Even though he kept the parliament under his full control, he called repeated sessions of the parliament to take major decisions. This relationship with his councillors and their role enabled parliament to be of significant importance during Henry viii's reign. However Edward and Mary were surrounded by many factors hindering parliamentary success such as economic loss, leading to parliament being of little significance in government. Elizabeth, on the other hand had a good relationship with her parliament and members of the Privy Council. Thus enabling a number of acts and policies to be passed in a short period of parliament meetings, such as the acts of embezzlement. An overall opinion is that parliament importance in government depended greatly on varying factors, the attitude and relationship of the monarch, the situation of England and the necessity of essential councillors to direct the parliaments importance in government. Theo Christie Mrs Bland ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A lot can be learnt from this essay about the dangers of slipping in to narrative and missing the point of developing an argument. the writer knows a lot about the period and is able to write about the events and people of the time but they do not address the issue in the question directly enough and this could keep the essay right down in the lower levels of any mark scheme. Planning is essential and each paragraph must open with a key point relating to the argument. If the introduction sets out the argument then the writing can keep returning to it.

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 29/08/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    Warren argues that 'Thomas Cartwright('s) lectures at Cambridge University represented the first influential public demand for a Presbyterian system'. and Lockyer agrees that this was a major threat, saying 'Cartwright's definition lifted the Puritan movement out of its obsession with details and threw down a challenge which the established Church

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why did Parliament win the English Civil War?

    The Parliamentarian army was thereafter a more decisive unit, this is especially significant when compared to that of the Royalist's who, although they had one main leader in Charles, were highly indecisive; perhaps a reflection of their leader's personality. Cromwell had an ability to rally cavalry and use it with previously unparalleled success against the enemy's cavalry.

  1. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    Choosing Catholicism went against Elizabeth's personal beliefs of Protestantism. Furthermore, Catholics may have an aversion to her ruling as head of state and their religion as they see her as an illegitimate bastard child. This is due to the fact that her father Henry broke away from the Catholic Church

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    Fawkes was caught and tortured, in the end revealing the names of his associates, who in turn were caught and punished. Following the Gunpowder Plot, James' attitude hardened, at least for a period, it provoked new penal laws in 1606 and united the king and parliament in a harsher anti-catholic stance.

  1. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    Kee has said that, "The success of Emmet's myth lay in the very need to ennoble failure. For tragic failure was to become part of Ireland's identity." Indeed, Emmet's words at his trial were to spur on a generation of revolutionary nationalists; "Let my memory be left in oblivion and

  2. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    So it came as a surprise to him when it failed. Part of the problem was that the officials responsible for collecting the money believed they were answerable to the community they governed, and not primarily the King. They therefore refused to partake in "black-listing" those who did not pay.

  1. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    As for Western, the increase of tax hit the peasants and the nobility benefitted because of the dissolution of monasteries. During this time, they also encountered problems, which were the main cause for the rebellion, the issue of religion. The Tudors did not experience problems with economy and social resentment

  2. Religion was the most serious problem facing Elizabeth in 1558? How far do you ...

    So to solve this Elizabeth signed the treaty of Cateau-Cambrasis, this gave France Calais for 10 years. This can be thought of as a success; it postponed war and saved money. Therefore this problem isn't as important. Spain and the Netherlands was also a threat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work