• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

"The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment of the Holocaust?

Extracts from this document...


?The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust?. How valid is this assessment of the Holocaust? The true origins of the Holocaust have been under academic debate and intense scrutiny among historians for a considerable amount of time. Dividing them into two major perspectives; Functionalists and Intentionalist.[1] The pair bring into view a key question and queries the shroud surrounding the Shoah. It questions what point in time the mass genocide of 6.6 million Jews was decided upon. Many would put forward the Holocaust was already assigned a position in the time-line using Hitler's own ?Mein Kampf? as justification. Others would suggest the Holocaust was result of numerous political economic and social factors, that brought about the rise of both The Nazi Party and Thrid Reich. There is substantial evidence to support both sides of the debate. Functionalist historians such as Browning and Mommsen agree that the power struggle between Hitler's subordinates and war played a much greater role in deciding the demise of the Jewish people compared with Hitler himself while Intentionalists like Fleming and Dawidowicz say Hitler was following a gradualist policy. Taking these perspectives into account while researching my own sources it seems implausible the Wannsee Conference headed by Reinhard Heydrich on 20th January 1942, conceived the Holocaust and it was most definitely not fully responsible for the Shoah, however it did play its part, comprised of fifteen highly educated leading Nazi officials, civil servants and SS members, brought together under a grand villa in Berlin on shores of Lake Wannsee to discuss a programme of mass murder. Anti-Semitism was by no means birthed from Nazi imagination, although it was the Nazi party who took advantage of this hidden resentment and unleashed it with mass exaggeration. Undoubtedly without the Nazi party it would not have manifested itself in such the way it did. Rhode's perspective is from the very early stages of the Nazi party they had clear enemy. ...read more.


The third step through this line of events can be viewed as Kristallnacht,[10] next to this is the invasion of the Soviet Union and the horrific work of the Einstazgruppen which led to the Wannsee Conference taking place, this then cemented the attitudes and actions that had arisen through the previous steps, finally all culminating in the arrival of the Holocaust. Kristallnacht itself was the act of a coincidence, but it leads as an example as to how far Anti-Semitism within Germany and Austria had progressed in terms of hatred of a certain race and allows an insight into how the acts of one were accountable for all in terms of the Jews. This source is particularly interesting as we get to see just how far the German people had been indoctrinated into the Nazi propaganda, although there were some who were against Kristallnacht, they were many who took it as an act of war, and saw it as their right to rid their country of the Jewish conspiracy. What is most disturbing about this extract is that it shows the murderous attitudes of people of persuasion and how far the German people were willing to go after being under the Nazi propaganda machine of Dr. Joseph Goebells. Kristallnacht was the result of the German people holding all the Jews accountable for the acts of one and was a key stage in the 1938 pogroms which would then culminate in the Holocaust. It was the actions of well-educated people, mostly the middle class which truly enforced Kristallnacht, taking it to a whole new level, the Nazi party had the fire service on hand just in-case the synagogue fires spread to the neighbouring buildings. Hitler was apart of Kristallnacht, it was mostly Joseph Goebbels who enraged the resentment towards to the Jews to produce this outcome, however the main ideology behind Kristallnacht was to remove Jews from their homes in order to re-home German citizens within the city. ...read more.


[6] Richard Rhodes, Masters of Death ? The SS einsatzgruppen and the invention of the Holocaust. Pg.98 ?The German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, codenamed ?Operation Barbarossa? was indeed to be inextricably linked with the decision to implement a genocidal war against all the Jews of Europe.? [7] 15 August 1941 two months into ?Operation Barbarossa? Himmler went to the Minsk Ghetto to observe the shootings of ?undesirables? for the first time. During the shooting Himmler who had never seen dead people before stood right at the edge of the open grave to look in, and because of this he had brain matter splashed onto his coat and head and began to feel sick, heaving and wobbling. Himmler then took into account the effect shooting people would have on their soldiers and began to look for alternative methods. [8] The Enabling Act was a decree put forth by Hitler in his rise to power that allowed him to maintain his reign over the German people, the decree abolished the need for a democratic vote every four years and therefore allowed Hitler to maintain his political position until his demise in 1945. [9] The Nuremburg Laws of September 15th 1935: the laws outlawed relationships betweens Jews and Aryans in order to make the Aryan blood pure again. [10] On the 9th November 1938: Kristallnacht (Night of broken glass) was responsible for approximately 100 dead Jews, 20,000 German and Austrian Jews arrested; many of those were sent to concentration camps. 1,350 Jewish synagogues were burnt to the ground and Jewish shops throughout Germany and Austria had their windows smashed and their homes looted. [11] By January 1942, the Nazi party had 11 concentration camps throughout their occupation of Europe. These were Dachau(1933), Sachsenhausen(1936), Buchenwald(1937), Flossenburg(1937), Mauthausen(1938), Ravensbruck(1939), Gusen(1939), Neuengamme(1940), Gross-Rosen(1940), Natzweiler(1940) and finally Auschwitz(1940) [12] http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/gascamp.html [13] Heydrich was Heinrich Himmler's deputy and head of the Reichssicherheitshauptamt. (Reich Security Main Office, or RSHA) [14] Eichman was in charge of organising and maintaining the logistics of the Holocaust. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    However by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in Western Europe many countries had accepted Jews and they were integrated into society and indeed, in 1871 the new German Empire gave Jews total civil equality (ibid pp 16). However, political conditions in Europe after 1870 saw much disruption as newly independent

  2. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    Kershaw also suggests that if Hitler did wish to intervene then his views were not challenged and he was allowed to overrule at any time. The following diary entry by Goebbels supports this view as Goebbels seems to be genuinely surprised at how Hitler's will is being carried out.

  1. Operation Barbarossa - Causes and Consequences

    Before the invasion took place, Stalin was warned many times of Hitler's true intentions. However, he preferred to trust his 'political instinct' rather than the secret reports he had been receiving for weeks. Convinced he had signed an eternal pact of friendship with Germany, he paid no attention to the evidence of Hitler's treachery his intelligence constantly presented to him.

  2. No Hitler: No Holocaust How far is this statement by the historian Michael Marrus ...

    On the basis of structure of government and decision making, Hitler was Fuhrer and so his will was law. He was a kind of absolute monarch, surrounded by officials all competing with each other and this Fuhrer system meant that there was no need for a decision making structure and therefore decision making was informal.

  1. Assess the view that the holocaust was due to a long term plan of ...

    This view is supported by historian Flemming who believes that it was a "pre-planned agenda and put to practice over 12 years"Nonetheless there wasn't a necessary consistant set up as Ian Kershaw states in interpretation D "Hitler had not been involved in the Wanasee conference...there was no need for his involvement".

  2. Assess the view that the Holocaust was mainly a result of a long term ...

    The impassioned language of "Mein Kampf" in which he captures the ultimate task to, "produce images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and ape", reflects an emotional involvement inseparable from the policy; though as early as the "Gemlich Letter", Hitler claimed unique "rationality" in his anti-semitism which would define policy and ensure a stronger Germany.

  1. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    * She was abandoned by her former friends, denounced by film historians and the press. She has never been able to shake the shadows of her past, she has been quoted as saying: 'I've suffered for half a century. It is an incredible burden'. Riefenstahl - The Propagandist or Artist?

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    The statement illustrates the main contention of the intentionalist view. This view was the first to arise, originating during the years following the Second World War. It must be noted that for the people living at this time, the carnage of the war was a very real memory, and consequently,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work