• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Throughout his reign, Henry VII deliberately pursued an anti-noble policy." Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Throughout his reign, Henry VII deliberately pursued an anti-noble policy." Discuss Henrys policy to the nobles during his reign could be considered as antagonistic. Henry had realised how easily the nobles could pose a threat to him, due to their power and responsibilities in his country, and so reduced this power thus reducing the possibilities of his downfall. This essays intention is to determine why Henry pursued such a dangerous policy, yet also reviewing the claims that his policies were anti-noble. This essay will also be interpreting the reasons for Henrys actions and the views of historians on the subject. Before the reign of Henry VII, the role of the nobles was highly significant in comparison to that during his reign due to the policies he introduced. Previous to his accession, the nobles had controlling, highly rated responsibilities, for example the Kings' lieutenants, which kept control of law and order in their locality. This position gave them power over many citizens which surrounded them, the problem for Henry being that these people were more likely to support their local noble, rather than a king whom they rarely or possibly never had contact with. ...read more.

Middle

First of all, Henry introduced the following ideas; firstly, he decided on a much smaller peerage, which meant that he assigned the "...fewest amounts of land in history..."3 to the nobles, giving them less power over nearby land. The next policy which he introduced was to give the least amount of favours to the nobles, through such things as finance, again restraining their power due to a smaller wealth, as well as the not providing them with armies. The most significant policy which he introduced, in this essays point of view, is the policy which made retaining illegal. This was a policy used by the nobles, giving them total authority over their workers, therefore creating the threat of them fighting on behalf of the nobles in opposition of the king. Henry also created attainders and ward ships which he created. These meant that nobles were required to sign 'contracts' to the king, which, if were broken entailed prison sentences, yet in many cases were settled financially, being a hefty source of finance for Henry. ...read more.

Conclusion

Henry's intelligence at firstly assessing the reigns of his predecessors before acting, portrays the idea to this essay that Henry assessed all possibilities involved with the nobility and their power, before acting, which plays a vital role in the length of his reign. Those whom Henry sacked from his council were, in the view of many historians, unsuitable for their position, and in some way incompetent. For Henry, the policies in which he introduced were clearly successful in securing his throne, as, although there were attempted usurptions, he remained in power until his death in ......, unlike many before him, who were forced to abdicate due to actions taken by the nobility. The main issue brought to attention in this essay is concerning the claim that Henry was anti-noble deliberately, to secure his throne; however, this is not the only issue. There are three main others. The initial exploration by this essay is into the financial prospects. Previously, before Henrys' policies, the nobles requested money from the king for amenities such as private armies. Henry's policy decreased the expenditure for these requests. 1 "England" Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 99. 2 Seminar Sheet page 1 3 Seminar sheet. Page 1 4 Seminar Sheet 5 Seminar Sheet ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did Henry VII reduce the power of the nobility

    4 star(s)

    in fact had an increase in power through means of influence and advice. Pendrill states that Henry made use of 43 peers throughout his reign, which is close to 80% of the total peerage, giving way to the idea that the Nobility did increase or atleast stayed at the same

  2. To What extent was Henry VII 's Reign Distinguished by Sober Statesmanship?

    painted with a very exaggerated left shoulder and a very deformed left arm. We know that pictoral images were improtant at this time as literacy levels were low (reaching about 30% in London) and relied on such images. Polydore Vergil an italian historian frequently wrote about Richard III and Henry VII.

  1. Charlemagne Essay.

    They would come fully armed. The war bands did not have obligation to serve. They wanted to serve became they wanted a portion of the booty. Ganshof argues that cavalry was the most important elite-victories. He believed that Charles' cavalries were superior to other cavalries.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    For a few months after the Paris debacle, it appeared as if Charles had been correct in listening to the advice of his counsellors as there appeared to be some success in his negotiations with the Duke. Ultimately, Joan's suspicions proved to be correct as the Duke did not concede Paris upon the end of the truce.

  1. How was Henry VII anti noble.

    This was because they could become independent and rebel against him. From reviewing such events as this, Henry could interpret the consequences of powerful nobles, although there are advantages, such as them helping controlling law and order, there were many negative aspects of having nobles.

  2. King Henry V: Noble Hero or Devious Brute?

    To most people, this is showing cold-heartedness and abuse of power, which can be described as brutish. Another example of Henry's callous tendencies, though he doesn't appear in this play, is Falstaff's death. According to Nell Quickly and Henry's old friends, the reason why Falstaff died was because, 'the king killed his heart'.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    Occasionally Parliament would be willing to make grants to the Kings for extraordinary events - such as to equip and pay an army to put down rebels - but normally the Tudor subjects did not expect to pay direct taxes to the King at all.

  2. How far did Henry VII deliberately attempt to reduce the power of the nobility ...

    Both of these, Henry VII did not make, they were already in place, having said that Henry VII exploited them for all they were worth. As Pendrill says, "Henry was the law? meaning that he could put both bonds and recognisance?s on whoever he saw fit, and furthermore, "The victim had no right of appeal".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work