• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point?

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point? The "great" reform act of 1832 changed a Parliamentary system that had not been changed since the seventeenth century. It introduced a uniform franchise for the first time based on the �10 householder qualification, giving the vote to the majority of the middle classes. The act had important results, both short and long-term, causing changes but also leaving much continuity with the unreformed system. At first glance, the Reform Act of 1832 was a major step into getting closer to the type of democracy we know today. The bill certainly changed many things but that does not necessarily mean that it reformed the things that it changed, for example the bill had the effect of not only limiting the Working Classes franchise but reducing ...read more.


Grey's refusal to introduce the secret ballot meant intimidation still occurred at election times, whole estates being coerced into voting for their landlords. The act abolished the most notorious rotten boroughs, for example Old Sarum, closing many familiar doors to aristocratic influence. By disfranchising the rotten boroughs and redistributing seats (56 small boroughs lost both their seats in Parliament, 30 lost one seat and 40 new boroughs were created) the Reform act made the electoral system correspond more closely to the distribution of population and wealth in the country. It reduced the over-representation of the boroughs relative to the counties. However, the act did not ensure to correspond very closely to the population distribution. The rural south of England continued to be over represented compared to London and the industrial North. ...read more.


The reform act of 1832 was a turning point to the extent that it "it opened the floodgates of reform". As the government had intended the electoral system was modified, not transformed, parliament was still representing the interests of the people and not the people themselves. The aristocracy retained its overall domination of politics, even if to the extent in which it did so had been decreased. However, it ended the worst abuses of the old system, prevented revolution, and reinvigorated the political system. It is said to have put Britain on the path of peaceful, democratic change, a welcome break to what was occurring in the rest of Europe at the time. The act began the long process of parliamentary reform in which, in the twentieth century, resulted in an approximately democratic system. Once the door was open, there was no hope of it ever closing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent was the 1832 reform act the result of popular pressure

    emphasis on the need for ordinary people to become more involved with politics. The unions, triggered by the economic slump, saw mass cooperation between the middle and working classes, which was greatly feared by the Tories. Common distresses drew the two sectors of society together in what they thought should

  2. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    Many Tory peers were disgusted and stayed away and so its passage was ensured How close Britain was to reform during the crisis is debatable and different historians held varying views on the situation. E.P.Thompson said "Britain was within an ace of revolution" as he argues that it was the

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    If this reform was passed it would result in the transfer of the political power from the agricultural south-west to the industrial north-west and to the hard working middle-class. The working class caused a number of protests and conflicts across the country.

  2. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Other commentators, notably Bentley (1984, p 87), Parry (1993, p 99) and O'Gorman (1986), have stressed that reform did not greatly alter the social composition of the Commons, or make the electorate 'popular', or transfer power to the urban middle classes.


    1918 Public Pressure (external to Parliament) Women * Increasing education for middle/upper class women including opportunities to become doctors and other professions. * London Society for Women's Suffrage founded 1867. Various regional societies amalgamated into the NSWS (National Society for Women's Suffrage 1872).

  2. To what extent was the 1832 Great Reform Act introduced due to fear of ...

    There are those, however, who believe that the threat of revolution present between 1831-32 was completely exaggerated. American historian Joseph Hamburger argues that radicals such as Francis Place and Thomas Attwood created a 'phoney' atmosphere of revolution at this time in order to prevent Wellington from forming a government and to exhort MPs to pass the Reform Bill quickly.

  1. Was 1832 the turning point in the growth of parliamentary democracy?

    50% of the population lived in counties but they only accounted for 1/3 of the seats. The Act did bring about but some changes in the distribution of seats but these were minimal as there was lots of continuity with the past.

  2. To What Extent Did the Great Reform Act 1832 Help Establish Democratic Politics in ...

    Local landed interests continued to enjoy many seats. Because the working class gained nothing from the Act and could still not vote (and because women could still not vote), the Act did not create total democracy in Britain. Corruption remained - seats were bought and sold and Gladstone and Disraeli entered Parliament through patronage, which also remained.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work