• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point?

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point? The "great" reform act of 1832 changed a Parliamentary system that had not been changed since the seventeenth century. It introduced a uniform franchise for the first time based on the �10 householder qualification, giving the vote to the majority of the middle classes. The act had important results, both short and long-term, causing changes but also leaving much continuity with the unreformed system. At first glance, the Reform Act of 1832 was a major step into getting closer to the type of democracy we know today. The bill certainly changed many things but that does not necessarily mean that it reformed the things that it changed, for example the bill had the effect of not only limiting the Working Classes franchise but reducing ...read more.


Grey's refusal to introduce the secret ballot meant intimidation still occurred at election times, whole estates being coerced into voting for their landlords. The act abolished the most notorious rotten boroughs, for example Old Sarum, closing many familiar doors to aristocratic influence. By disfranchising the rotten boroughs and redistributing seats (56 small boroughs lost both their seats in Parliament, 30 lost one seat and 40 new boroughs were created) the Reform act made the electoral system correspond more closely to the distribution of population and wealth in the country. It reduced the over-representation of the boroughs relative to the counties. However, the act did not ensure to correspond very closely to the population distribution. The rural south of England continued to be over represented compared to London and the industrial North. ...read more.


The reform act of 1832 was a turning point to the extent that it "it opened the floodgates of reform". As the government had intended the electoral system was modified, not transformed, parliament was still representing the interests of the people and not the people themselves. The aristocracy retained its overall domination of politics, even if to the extent in which it did so had been decreased. However, it ended the worst abuses of the old system, prevented revolution, and reinvigorated the political system. It is said to have put Britain on the path of peaceful, democratic change, a welcome break to what was occurring in the rest of Europe at the time. The act began the long process of parliamentary reform in which, in the twentieth century, resulted in an approximately democratic system. Once the door was open, there was no hope of it ever closing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    piece is that during the Bristol riots the better off working class were so disgusted that they ignored them and went home, yet surely if revolution was so close the riots should have been a starting pistol. I therefore believe that the individual will have opposing views on the situation

  2. Was 1832 the turning point in the growth of parliamentary democracy?

    50% of the population lived in counties but they only accounted for 1/3 of the seats. The Act did bring about but some changes in the distribution of seats but these were minimal as there was lots of continuity with the past.

  1. To what extent was the 1832 reform act the result of popular pressure

    emphasis on the need for ordinary people to become more involved with politics. The unions, triggered by the economic slump, saw mass cooperation between the middle and working classes, which was greatly feared by the Tories. Common distresses drew the two sectors of society together in what they thought should


    The Women's Suffrage Journal (1870-), Votes for Women (1907-). * Women had made significant legal progress e.g. Married Woman's Property Act (1875); single women rate payers allowed to vote in municipal elections (1869) and could be elected to school boards and become Poor Law guardians; * They could vote in county council elections (1888)

  1. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Though it was presented by ministers as a 'final' measure, they meant by this that it would satisfy existing demands. Whig leaders accepted that in future decades representation might have to be conceded to new interests, and Milton-Smith concludes that the reform bill should be viewed more as a concession than a cure.

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    business if they did not vote for who they were told to. Also because elections were 'open' not secret, it was possible for the wealthy people to check whether people did vote for their candidates. Constituencies that came under the control of a wealthy individual became known as 'rotten' or 'pocket' boroughs.

  1. Do you agree with the contemporary view that the Reform Act of 1832 was ...

    These MPs would now have to compete more actively in a new constituency to retain their seat in the future, possibly weakening this classes representation in the country, arguably allowing it to be said that in this respect 1832 could be viewed as a defeat for the middle class.

  2. Why was there a reform act in 1832? What were the consequences of the ...

    In desperation, Charles issued the Ordinances of St Cloud which sparked a revolution in the French capital in July 1830. This worried the government. People in England weren't the only people pressing for reform. The Irish were too. The Church of England was very anti-Catholicism, the Church and the Monarchy were against Catholic Emancipation, but the Whigs weren't.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work