• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point? The "great" reform act of 1832 changed a Parliamentary system that had not been changed since the seventeenth century. It introduced a uniform franchise for the first time based on the �10 householder qualification, giving the vote to the majority of the middle classes. The act had important results, both short and long-term, causing changes but also leaving much continuity with the unreformed system. At first glance, the Reform Act of 1832 was a major step into getting closer to the type of democracy we know today. The bill certainly changed many things but that does not necessarily mean that it reformed the things that it changed, for example the bill had the effect of not only limiting the Working Classes franchise but reducing ...read more.

Middle

Grey's refusal to introduce the secret ballot meant intimidation still occurred at election times, whole estates being coerced into voting for their landlords. The act abolished the most notorious rotten boroughs, for example Old Sarum, closing many familiar doors to aristocratic influence. By disfranchising the rotten boroughs and redistributing seats (56 small boroughs lost both their seats in Parliament, 30 lost one seat and 40 new boroughs were created) the Reform act made the electoral system correspond more closely to the distribution of population and wealth in the country. It reduced the over-representation of the boroughs relative to the counties. However, the act did not ensure to correspond very closely to the population distribution. The rural south of England continued to be over represented compared to London and the industrial North. ...read more.

Conclusion

The reform act of 1832 was a turning point to the extent that it "it opened the floodgates of reform". As the government had intended the electoral system was modified, not transformed, parliament was still representing the interests of the people and not the people themselves. The aristocracy retained its overall domination of politics, even if to the extent in which it did so had been decreased. However, it ended the worst abuses of the old system, prevented revolution, and reinvigorated the political system. It is said to have put Britain on the path of peaceful, democratic change, a welcome break to what was occurring in the rest of Europe at the time. The act began the long process of parliamentary reform in which, in the twentieth century, resulted in an approximately democratic system. Once the door was open, there was no hope of it ever closing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent was the 1832 reform act the result of popular pressure

    emphasis on the need for ordinary people to become more involved with politics. The unions, triggered by the economic slump, saw mass cooperation between the middle and working classes, which was greatly feared by the Tories. Common distresses drew the two sectors of society together in what they thought should

  2. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    Many Tory peers were disgusted and stayed away and so its passage was ensured How close Britain was to reform during the crisis is debatable and different historians held varying views on the situation. E.P.Thompson said "Britain was within an ace of revolution" as he argues that it was the

  1. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Other commentators, notably Bentley (1984, p 87), Parry (1993, p 99) and O'Gorman (1986), have stressed that reform did not greatly alter the social composition of the Commons, or make the electorate 'popular', or transfer power to the urban middle classes.

  2. UNIT 5 PAPER 5A: REPRESENTATION AND DEMOCRACY IN BRITAIN, 1830-1931

    The Women's Suffrage Journal (1870-), Votes for Women (1907-). * Women had made significant legal progress e.g. Married Woman's Property Act (1875); single women rate payers allowed to vote in municipal elections (1869) and could be elected to school boards and become Poor Law guardians; * They could vote in county council elections (1888)

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    At the current time in 1815 small boroughs were represented in Parliament, however, major industrial towns were not. The middle class wanted the pocket boroughs in which the number of representatives had been controlled by aristocratic landowners to be disenfranchised along with the rotten boroughs which had no or very small population.

  2. To What Extent Did the Great Reform Act 1832 Help Establish Democratic Politics in ...

    Local landed interests continued to enjoy many seats. Because the working class gained nothing from the Act and could still not vote (and because women could still not vote), the Act did not create total democracy in Britain. Corruption remained - seats were bought and sold and Gladstone and Disraeli entered Parliament through patronage, which also remained.

  1. Why was the first Great Reform Act passed in 1832 and not before?

    This proved that change in the constitution was relatively welcome. Wellington confessed defeat following his 1830 November statements, after which he was told, 'You have announced the fall of your Government.' He had done so by saying that he didn't want Reform as he had given in on the issue of Catholic Emancipation.

  2. To what extent was the 1832 Great Reform Act introduced due to fear of ...

    There are those, however, who believe that the threat of revolution present between 1831-32 was completely exaggerated. American historian Joseph Hamburger argues that radicals such as Francis Place and Thomas Attwood created a 'phoney' atmosphere of revolution at this time in order to prevent Wellington from forming a government and to exhort MPs to pass the Reform Bill quickly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work