• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was James 1st to blame for all the financial problems?

Extracts from this document...


Was James to blame for all the financial problems? It is obvious that under James' reign over England there were a lot of financial problems. There were many factors that caused these problems, and I am going to investigate just how many of them were James' fault. Someone once said "A King should be able to live on hi own", this was the idea that a King should not need money from parliament to survive. This was not true for James though. One main factor that caused financial problems in England was the debt bequeathed to James from Elizabeth's rule. This debt had grown from the war with Spain and the suppression of the Irish. Elizabeth needed money to support these campaigns and thus had sold half the Crown lands. The Crown lands brought in an income for the King/Queen and therefore when Elizabeth sold half the Crown lands it meant James was starting off on a bad foot, with a debt left to him, to overcome. When James inherited the Crown lands they were only producing �128,00 annually, which was significantly less than required to pay for the cost of government, defence administration and the royal household. ...read more.


One could argue that it was the Chancellor's faults for not being strict enough with James about his finances, and for not teaching him how to manage them safely. He had many Chancellors throughout his reign. None of whom were able to cut his expenditure enough to break equilibrium with the debt. Each one had a different approach to the problem. One man called Salsbury, came up with the idea of the Great Contract. This was a contract between James and parliament that if signed by both sides, would allow James �200,000 yearly. To try and secure the contract James offered to do away with Wardship and Perveyance but parliament eventually declined the agreement, as it would mean they would lose control over James' spending. Overall Salsbury tried to increase James income rather than telling him anything about controlling expenditure. With the contract failing James was left with an ever problematic debt. This was therefore not entirely James' fault. James was forever asking for subsidies from parliament to solve his financial problems. ...read more.


The crown lands value were not rising with inflation either, which meant that again he was not earning as much money as he should have been from them. However was this James' fault? James had admitted to not being able to manage finance to parliament, yet they still expected him to notice and alter things like the book of rates, which to be honest, he probably had no idea about. Therefore I feel it was also parliaments fault for not aiding James enough. One of James' chancellors Thomas Sackville, did eventually change the book of rates according to inflation but by this time James had lost a lot money due to the outdated system. In conclusion I don't think James was to blame fully for all the finance problems. I think he definitely contributed to them the most and did not do anything really to manage the debt. His spendthrift ways and complete lack of financial awareness were, I feel the main factor causing his financial problems. However I do feel that parliament were to blame as well, for not aiding him enough, and for not being efficient and effective in collecting taxes. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    At the start of the thirty-year war between Protestantism and Catholicism James was threatened and pressured by the Puritans for support which caused him to support the Catholic cause. Puritans became increasingly influential in parliament, criticising his foreign policy based on James' reluctance to go to war and support them.

  2. The reign of James I (a) Explain briefly the financial policies of James I, ...

    James handled the difficult issue of religion fairly well and it was not the cause of major disputes between himself and Parliament. The problem came when James inherited the Anglican Church. It contained Puritans that wanted the church to loose all traces of Catholicism and it also contained Armenians who favoured many of the Catholic ideas.

  1. How far were James I's problems inherited, how far of his own making?

    at the time of her death, and that another �100,000 of the money owed had been collected in the late 1590s as forced loans which nobody realistically expected the crown to repay, it could be argued that Elizabeth died relatively solvent10.

  2. How Significant were the problems that Elizabeth bequeathed to James I

    in collection, the vicar would take up pluralism (a second job), such as preaching in other parishes or they would become a teacher in the local school or even become a tutor for the wealthy families. This was all a problem for James I even though he was a protestant himself.

  1. How influential was Dudley on the reign of Elizabeth 1st

    This judgment I have of you that you will not be corrupted by any manner of gift and that you will be faithful to the state; and that without respect of my private will you will give me that counsel which you think best and if you shall know anything

  2. The Portrait of a Lady. Discuss James representations of 'places' for women in this ...

    Her failure exposes the extent of her manipulation, both internal and external. Now I will discuss Dickens's Great Expectations. Much can be said about Dickens' view of women according to the way he constructs his female characters in Great Expectations.

  1. "Wormold…James Wormold." 'Our man in Havana', A parody of James Bond.

    considering Bond's 'Live and let die' 'Die another day' reckless attitude towards life, he would be cool and calm about the whole ordeal and never uncontrollably drunk. Not only physically, but also in many other details Greene contrasts Wormold to Bond to create humour.

  2. In your opinion, who is most to blame for the outcome in “On the ...

    Blame is a large part of the story. All the characters play their part in causing the mess that has been caused, although, they do not set out to intentionally hurt one another. All the main characters carry out actions that may be wrong but if the story is looked

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work