• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Munich Settlement a disaster for Britain in 1938?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?The Munich Settlement of September 1938 was a disaster for Britain? To what extent do you agree with this opinion? Explain your answer, using the evidence of Sources 7, 8 and 9 and your own knowledge of the issues related to this controversy. The Munich Settlement of September 1938 has a much divided response with historians today. On the one hand it could be said that it was disastrous as it not only gave Hitler further sign of British weakness, it also importantly strengthened the German army as agreed with in Source 7, which is true as in 1938-9 German war production was at a higher level than Britain. This source also argues that Britain, with its allies (assuming they would agree to fight) could have resisted Germany as their army was spread out thinly. However Sources 8 and 9 give reason for the Munch Settlement being a success, as British forces were not ready to fight, allies may not have contributed and the French plan was to stay behind the Maginot Line. ...read more.

Middle

However it is true to say that although they may not have been ?indifferent? the majority of public reaction favoured appeasement and it was approved in the House of Commons 366 votes to 144. Furthermore, in Source 7, Churchill indicates that only five of the thirteen German divisions were composed of front line troops, and the rest were ?left in the West at the time of the Munich arrangement.? This shows his thoughts that Britain made a vital mistake and should have resisted as the German army was stretched thin. This is true as had a European war broken out in 1938, Germany would have had to fight on two fronts. Churchill?s opinion may be supported if Britain, France, Czechoslovakia and the USSR had all resisted as the Luftwaffe was not ready for an attack, the French were still the best army in Europe and Czech forces weren?t negligible. Source 9 disagrees with Source 7 as ?unlike Churchill in 1938 Chamberlain had knowledge of what passed for the French war-plan.? A plan of which decided the French would ?wait behind the Maginot Line untill British had expanded their Army?, a plan which would have relieved the Czechs. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although Chamberlain emphasised that foreign policy was still appeasement and that that rearmament had been instated simply as insurance. Overall the Munich Settlement was not an easy choice for Chamberlain as the results of appeasement or resistance both could have ended with disastrous consequences. It is important to address that the settlement was humiliating and betraying to the Czech?s who lost a great amount after the German invasion as shown in Source 7. The settlement also allowed for the German army and crucially, Hitler?s position in Germany to be strengthened. However had Chamberlain immediately resisted Hitler?s intention to invade Czech, the British Armed Forces would have been far from prepared, and despite German forces being weaker before the Munich Settlement as Churchill states in Source 7, the likelihood of Britain defeating Germany was still not secure due to the French staying behind the Maginot Line, USSR being unreliable and South Africa and Australia?s reluctance to go to war. So altogether the Munich Settlement may be seen as a triumph as it vitally bought time for Britain to start rearming which if they had not done could have resulted in Britain losing WW2. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    population, in absolute numbers the Nazi party was predominantly a lower middle-class party. One could also argue that the economic depression was not the only direct cause of the growth of the NSDAP toward the end of the republic. After all, workers, who suffered the most from unemployment, were underrepresented in the party.

  2. Apeasement Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the ...

    The league initially called for the withdrawal of foreign participation, but did nothing to back up its demands. The Republicans also claimed that the policy of non-intervention was illegal since it denied help to a government recognised by the league, while failing to stop German and Italian aggression against that government.

  1. Journalism: The People's Witness

    Burchett believes that - 'The purpose of this type of propaganda is obvious. The idea is to make the German people believe that these colonies actually belong to them, that the German people are the only one who have a rightful claim to them, and that powers now in possession are robbers.

  2. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    a relatively small force, and greatly increase their striking force on the northern bank. " Therefore Eden is clearly stating that the remilitarisation f the Rhineland was indeed a clear threat to France and international peace. Winston Churchill was also a clear critic of the policy of appeasement stating that

  1. 'At Munich Hitler gained what he wanted and achieved conquest without firing a shot' ...

    In relation to the western powers, Taylor shows how Hitler's traditional substantial German appetite was constantly whetted by the concessions offered to him by the British and French leaders. 2 'Not only did the British and French urge concessions on the Czechs.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The Bolsheviks lead protests demanding to over throw the provisional government. Many Bolsheviks were in disagreement to if it would be better to wait or support the demonstrations. The lack of organisation resulted in blood shed and Bolshevik losing support.

  1. Explain the role of Czechoslovakia in the appeasement story.

    But in these elections the Communist Party linked Henlein's Party very directly to Hitler. The Communists said that by voting for German People's Party they were voting for Hitler and therefore voting for war. This link was of course denied and Henlein managed to get away with it because the

  2. Was appeasement the only option open to Britain in 1938-1939?

    proper force to back up the overly reasonable concessions made, it quickly became Hitler's tool for the destruction of Czechoslovakia and the start of World War II. The policy itself relied upon the notion that the existing territorial disputes in Europe could be met without resorting to even the threat of violence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work