• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar governments ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar government?s ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929? Gustav Stresemann became Chancellor of Germany during a period of widespread instability within the country. Described as ?Weimar Germany?s Greatest Statesman? by British historian Jonathan Wright, Stresemann?s diplomatic leadership amongst his effective management of the German economy have undoubtedly had a profound influence in the state of the country. In October 1926 he was awarded the highly prestigious Nobel peace prize ? illustrating that his influence had reverberated throughout the entire world. It is therefore of no surprise that many will perceive him as a savior of Germany; a vital factor to the country?s growth and success in the 1920s. Many will also view him as a significant contributor to the country?s ability to overcome the major challenges it had been confronted with at the time. But to determine whether Stresemann?s efforts to improve the status of Weimar Germany were the main reason for the government?s ability to subdue the many obstacles they faced, one must explore three principal questions: 1. What challenges were faced by the government? ...read more.

Middle

After all, he managed to improve the economy, the international status of Germany ? otherwise damaged from WWI, as well as contributed to the reduction of political extremism in the country; a product of economic growth. However, while that may be a valid interpretation of Stresemann?s leadership, it does not explore the many issues that were still not tackled with; those that yet remained in Weimar Germany. One of which would be the political divisions in German politics. Liberals, socialists, conservatives, nationalists? These Political divisions were exemplified by divisions in German society. Political parties had their own books, magazines, bars, choirs, sports clubs etc. Indeed it made it very difficult for political parties to collaborate during the 1920s and early 1930s. This therefore made German government rather tricky because proportional representation meant it was difficult for a single party to win a majority in the Reichstag. Coalition governments were necessary where parties had to work together ? yet these often resulted in a lot of disagreement thereby undermining the new constitution. Stresemann was unable to solve this inherent weakness of the Weimar constitution and it remained within successive governments. ...read more.

Conclusion

Beyond all, Gustav Stresemann was still not the sole contributor towards German stability and prosperity in the 1920s. As had been clarified, Ebert, Hindenburg, article 48 and right-wing cooperation all had a certain involvement in this. While other factors certainly had their part, It seems however, that Stresemann was indeed the main reason for the Weimar?s government?s ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929. If it wasn?t for Stresemann?s leadership, political extremism may have still remained a major threat to the government. It was due to Stresemann?s economic policies that such a threat was actually diminished. Should the prospect of a far-left revolt have persisted, perhaps the history of Weimar government may have turned out entirely different. Moreover, Stresemann?s ability to improve the country?s international status also helped it, in that the allies now had a better relationship with Germany. This meant Germany more support and as a result, was no longer left in an isolated and vulnerable state. I therefore agree with the given interpretation that it was predominantly Gustav Stresemann?s service that helped eliminate the challenges confronting the government at the time. The other factors alone do not appear strong enough to have overcome such challenges, and it seems that without the support of Gustav Stresemann, Weimar Germany would have most likely encountered even larger complications throughout its existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 ...

    The clearest evidence that the Right-Wing was a huge threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic is that in the Kapp Putsch it actually managed to overthrow the government and install a new, right-wing government. In 1920, Wolfgang Kapp, leader of the right-wing, Fatherland Party led 12,000 troops alongside

  2. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    industrial strength, which made it even more difficult for them to cope with the reparation payments. There were also, clearly, many people unhappy that 10% of the German population had been lost due to the land taken in the Treaty of Versailles.

  1. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    Gropius set out to train artists and craftsmen together in a single school (Bauhaus) directed by an architect. At the time it was seen as a novel and new way to break from the conventional kind of academic training which taught students to become "little Raphael's and pattern designers."(5)

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The New York Herald Tribune correspondent, entering Berlin on May 3, 1945, wrote: "Nothing is left in Berlin. There are no homes, no shops, no transportation, no government buildings. Only a few walls are the heritage bequeathed by the Nazis to the people of Berlin.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    1. Some thought he was corrupt and vicious and always supported Stalin?s direction for the party. Stalin obviously felt threatened by him, as in 1933 he appointed Kirov as a party secretary in Moscow, in order to remove him from his powerbase in Leningrad.

  2. Stresemann controlling inflation, was the main reason behind the success of the Weimar Republic ...

    This was because the western powers wanted to keep Germany from falling in to communism which they could be easily influenced to join the communist side with the USSR given the state that Germany was in. All these reasons were extremely significant as it showed Germany still had power over the western countries even though they had nothing at all.

  1. The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 ...

    Putsch suggests that the violence from the right was not strong enough to completely set up a stable Putsch which ultimately demonstrates this was not the main factor of the threat to the stability of the republic. A further way the right wing violence was a significant threat to the

  2. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    They will cry out ?We want war!??[9]. This goes some way in explaining Germany?s capacity to back Hitler as they saw it him and the Nazis as the only way they could they could reclaim their losses. It also may explain Germany?s course of action before the outbreak of war in 1939.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work