• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar governments ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929?

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar government?s ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929? Gustav Stresemann became Chancellor of Germany during a period of widespread instability within the country. Described as ?Weimar Germany?s Greatest Statesman? by British historian Jonathan Wright, Stresemann?s diplomatic leadership amongst his effective management of the German economy have undoubtedly had a profound influence in the state of the country. In October 1926 he was awarded the highly prestigious Nobel peace prize ? illustrating that his influence had reverberated throughout the entire world. It is therefore of no surprise that many will perceive him as a savior of Germany; a vital factor to the country?s growth and success in the 1920s. Many will also view him as a significant contributor to the country?s ability to overcome the major challenges it had been confronted with at the time. But to determine whether Stresemann?s efforts to improve the status of Weimar Germany were the main reason for the government?s ability to subdue the many obstacles they faced, one must explore three principal questions: 1. What challenges were faced by the government? ...read more.


After all, he managed to improve the economy, the international status of Germany ? otherwise damaged from WWI, as well as contributed to the reduction of political extremism in the country; a product of economic growth. However, while that may be a valid interpretation of Stresemann?s leadership, it does not explore the many issues that were still not tackled with; those that yet remained in Weimar Germany. One of which would be the political divisions in German politics. Liberals, socialists, conservatives, nationalists? These Political divisions were exemplified by divisions in German society. Political parties had their own books, magazines, bars, choirs, sports clubs etc. Indeed it made it very difficult for political parties to collaborate during the 1920s and early 1930s. This therefore made German government rather tricky because proportional representation meant it was difficult for a single party to win a majority in the Reichstag. Coalition governments were necessary where parties had to work together ? yet these often resulted in a lot of disagreement thereby undermining the new constitution. Stresemann was unable to solve this inherent weakness of the Weimar constitution and it remained within successive governments. ...read more.


Beyond all, Gustav Stresemann was still not the sole contributor towards German stability and prosperity in the 1920s. As had been clarified, Ebert, Hindenburg, article 48 and right-wing cooperation all had a certain involvement in this. While other factors certainly had their part, It seems however, that Stresemann was indeed the main reason for the Weimar?s government?s ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929. If it wasn?t for Stresemann?s leadership, political extremism may have still remained a major threat to the government. It was due to Stresemann?s economic policies that such a threat was actually diminished. Should the prospect of a far-left revolt have persisted, perhaps the history of Weimar government may have turned out entirely different. Moreover, Stresemann?s ability to improve the country?s international status also helped it, in that the allies now had a better relationship with Germany. This meant Germany more support and as a result, was no longer left in an isolated and vulnerable state. I therefore agree with the given interpretation that it was predominantly Gustav Stresemann?s service that helped eliminate the challenges confronting the government at the time. The other factors alone do not appear strong enough to have overcome such challenges, and it seems that without the support of Gustav Stresemann, Weimar Germany would have most likely encountered even larger complications throughout its existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 ...

    The clearest evidence that the Right-Wing was a huge threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic is that in the Kapp Putsch it actually managed to overthrow the government and install a new, right-wing government. In 1920, Wolfgang Kapp, leader of the right-wing, Fatherland Party led 12,000 troops alongside

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    This discontent amongst many Russians of all classes led to an event called Bloody Sunday. In St. Petersburg an Orthadox priest named Gapon with the support of the police and Social Democrats, set up a union for industrialist workers. Gapon's aim was to reduce the number of Marxists.

  1. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    The reparation charges meant that the country had massive debts to pay, which resulted in families barely being able to support themselves with food and other basic necessities. Lots of land had been lost to other countries, which resulted in Germany losing a lot of their workforce along with their

  2. How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

    As the new politicians had so little knowledge of democracy and had been basically thrown in at the deep end, they formed numerous different parties that, had they had some experience of the democratic system, would have been combined together.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    170,000 (dead, all military), * Canada 40,000 (dead),Italy 400,000 (dead including 70,000 civilians = 1 percent of population). These figures ignore the no less horrendous totals of wounded-2 million in Germany alone-and the tens of millions of people uprooted from their homes by the war and its aftermath: a displacement

  2. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    This might help to explain the lack of resistance to the Franco - Belgian invasion of the Ruhr. It may also help to explain the rapid increase in Germany?s armed forces following Hitler?s rise to power. Germany would once again establish a sizable army, a devastating air force (the Luftwaffe)

  1. The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 ...

    stability of the republic was its violence in the form of political murders. Out of the 376 political murderers that occurred in the period right wing organisations, such as the Consul Organisation, were responsible for 354 of them which suggests that the right was responsible for a majority of the violence towards the republic.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Interpretations of collectivisation: One argument is that Stalin had clear economic and political motives and so planned and carried out the process once he was in power. Stalin was prepared to use force to make the peasants switch from the NEP to collectivisation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work