• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar governments ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar government?s ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929? Gustav Stresemann became Chancellor of Germany during a period of widespread instability within the country. Described as ?Weimar Germany?s Greatest Statesman? by British historian Jonathan Wright, Stresemann?s diplomatic leadership amongst his effective management of the German economy have undoubtedly had a profound influence in the state of the country. In October 1926 he was awarded the highly prestigious Nobel peace prize ? illustrating that his influence had reverberated throughout the entire world. It is therefore of no surprise that many will perceive him as a savior of Germany; a vital factor to the country?s growth and success in the 1920s. Many will also view him as a significant contributor to the country?s ability to overcome the major challenges it had been confronted with at the time. But to determine whether Stresemann?s efforts to improve the status of Weimar Germany were the main reason for the government?s ability to subdue the many obstacles they faced, one must explore three principal questions: 1. What challenges were faced by the government? ...read more.

Middle

After all, he managed to improve the economy, the international status of Germany ? otherwise damaged from WWI, as well as contributed to the reduction of political extremism in the country; a product of economic growth. However, while that may be a valid interpretation of Stresemann?s leadership, it does not explore the many issues that were still not tackled with; those that yet remained in Weimar Germany. One of which would be the political divisions in German politics. Liberals, socialists, conservatives, nationalists? These Political divisions were exemplified by divisions in German society. Political parties had their own books, magazines, bars, choirs, sports clubs etc. Indeed it made it very difficult for political parties to collaborate during the 1920s and early 1930s. This therefore made German government rather tricky because proportional representation meant it was difficult for a single party to win a majority in the Reichstag. Coalition governments were necessary where parties had to work together ? yet these often resulted in a lot of disagreement thereby undermining the new constitution. Stresemann was unable to solve this inherent weakness of the Weimar constitution and it remained within successive governments. ...read more.

Conclusion

Beyond all, Gustav Stresemann was still not the sole contributor towards German stability and prosperity in the 1920s. As had been clarified, Ebert, Hindenburg, article 48 and right-wing cooperation all had a certain involvement in this. While other factors certainly had their part, It seems however, that Stresemann was indeed the main reason for the Weimar?s government?s ability to overcome the challenges it faced during 1919 to 1929. If it wasn?t for Stresemann?s leadership, political extremism may have still remained a major threat to the government. It was due to Stresemann?s economic policies that such a threat was actually diminished. Should the prospect of a far-left revolt have persisted, perhaps the history of Weimar government may have turned out entirely different. Moreover, Stresemann?s ability to improve the country?s international status also helped it, in that the allies now had a better relationship with Germany. This meant Germany more support and as a result, was no longer left in an isolated and vulnerable state. I therefore agree with the given interpretation that it was predominantly Gustav Stresemann?s service that helped eliminate the challenges confronting the government at the time. The other factors alone do not appear strong enough to have overcome such challenges, and it seems that without the support of Gustav Stresemann, Weimar Germany would have most likely encountered even larger complications throughout its existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 ...

    The clearest evidence that the Right-Wing was a huge threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic is that in the Kapp Putsch it actually managed to overthrow the government and install a new, right-wing government. In 1920, Wolfgang Kapp, leader of the right-wing, Fatherland Party led 12,000 troops alongside

  2. Hitlers Germany

    In the beginning each of the zones was sealed off tightly from the others. The ruined economy, the disrupted transportation, and the divided families all found further difficulties and complications created by four zones, four occupying powers, four different political and administrative setups, four different mentalities, and four borders to cross.

  1. How effectively did Weimar governments deal with the problems faced between 1919-1929?

    in place of central government in German towns/cities, and using violent methods. However, the republic survived all attempts to overthrow the communists: the army crushed the communist uprisings in 1919, 1920, 1921, and 1923 and the Munich Putsch in 1923, while the Kapp Putsch in 1920 was brought down by a general strike.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The assassin insisted he had acted alone, but he was executed with several other alleged accomplices. Consequences of the Kirov assassination: 1. Stalin used the event as an excuse to implement a reign of terror, first against leading party or ex-party members.

  1. The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 ...

    Putsch suggests that the violence from the right was not strong enough to completely set up a stable Putsch which ultimately demonstrates this was not the main factor of the threat to the stability of the republic. A further way the right wing violence was a significant threat to the

  2. (RE) To what extent did the Weimar Republic in the 1920s overcome the problems ...

    the will of the German people to defeat the Versailles on their own. This became a huge problem for the Weimar Republic as the people were divided with the logic of the so called Republic government in itself. After the hyperinflation in 1923 economic policy in Berlin was to be

  1. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    ?The disgraceful Treaty is being signed today. Don?t forget it! We will never stop until we win back what we deserve.[8]? These words were printed in a German newspaper in 1919 to illustrate the unhappiness and bitterness of Germans towards the Treaty.

  2. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    But in the first 8 hours 1200 aircraft were destroyed by the Germans and 800 didn?t even take off. So there was a poor defence. Also on the outbreak of war, there were 5 million Soviet soldiers and another 5 million in reserves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work