• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a minority Tory government end up passing a far more reaching measure of parliamentary reform in1867, than its minority liberal predecessor in 1866?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did a minority Tory government end up passing a far more reaching measure of parliamentary reform in1867, than its minority liberal predecessor in 1866? After the death of the Liberal leader Palmerston in 1865, Lord John Russell replaces him as P.M. Palmerston was opposed to any types of reform and wanted to maintain the old parliamentary system, but Russell however was enthusiastic in the on the notion of parliamentary reform, he wanted the franchise extended to "respectable" literate god fearing men. However even prior to Pam's death, there were indications that the Liberal Party were edging towards reform like for example the work of John Bright a Birmingham MP who had achieved a bonds between the working and middle classes that hadn't been achieved anywhere else - this further showed that working classes could be respectable and deserving of the vote. In 1866 Gladstone proposed his Reform Bill, not very radical terms - increase franchise 200,000 in boroughs and 170,000 in the counties - redistribution of seats proposed calculated to give more of an advantage to the Liberals, however the bill did have weakness which meant it excluded the poorest householders i.e those whose property had a an annual rate of �6 or less. ...read more.

Middle

With the Liberals in decline, it was time for the Tory Party to seize the political power they had lost in the repeal of the corn laws and yearned so much since. Even though the Tories who still headed mainly for the interests of Aristocracy weren't expected to pass significant reform, the deteriorating economy and the widespread working class frustration over reform the persuaded the Tories to act quickly and pass a bill. However to a certain extent the reason the 2nd reform acts was much more far reaching than that of its liberal predecessor's in 1866 was also because of other external factors. In terms of external factors the area of high politics and pressure from below was especially significant; as the against a backdrop of trade depression and a cholera epidemic, mass agitation for reform also increased which is shown by the violent riots and demonstrations in Hyde park within the 1866-1867 period. There are also these great external social forces which also helped in building the momentum for political reform, an example of this was in the American civil war when the industrial North won over the Agrarian South which promoted slave labour because of it's thriving cotton trade. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although the Tories did initially set the ball rolling by proposing reform, eventually the bill gained momentum on its own accord, clear indication of this is how in trying to appeal the to the Radicals to get the bill through the H of C, the Tories had to imposed huge changes onto their initially simple bill; like enfranchising the previously missing �10 lodger, agreeing to Hodgkinson's amendment or abandoning their original idea of "fancy franchises". Disraeli ultimately felt that by pushing for parliamentary reform, the Conservatives might win over the previously working class factions that didn't appeal to them, who were now being enfranchised, so giving the Tories stronger grip on the suburbs and counties, In this way the Conservatives could break the long record of poor elections since and also gain the political power they were missing since the break of the party in 1847. Not only would it grant them more power, but Tories passing much more far reaching reforms in 1867 than benefited the average working man, could also challenge the age old perception that the Tories only saw the interests of the Aristocracy, and so essential in changing the public perception of the Conservatives. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent were the Tory reforms, 1822-1830, 'liberal' and 'enlightened'?

    The economic reforms introduced during this period had already been planned by Wallace during the reactionary period and before the 'turning point' of 1822. Wallace recommended the relaxation of the Navigation Act. Vansittart had reinstated the Gold Standard in 1819, stabilising the currency and economy, and free-trade was a continuation

  2. To what extent was Disraeli personally committed to social reform

    For one, Feuchtwanger points out that the speeches contained no specific legislative programme and "all references to social reform were quite short and lacking in detail".7 Even R.A Cross, Disraeli's Home Secretary, stated his disbelief; "From all his speeches, I had quite expected that his mind was full of legislative schemes, but such did not prove to be the case"8.

  1. What impact did the Reform Acts of 1867 and 1884 have on the political ...

    After the Third Reform Act the working-classes formed the majority of the electorate and some constituencies were represented by working-class M.P.s like Henry Broadhurst, a stone-mason and Trade Union Official. It also had an impact on the parties themselves as there needed to be a local party structure to keep tabs on the electorate and to encourage them to vote.

  2. Why did the Tories pass the Reform Bill in 1867?

    He feared that the accolade that would be associated with reform might go to the Conservatives. If the Liberal Party introduced reform, they would get the credit for it; therefore it can be argued that Disraeli was not a genuine supporter of reform and that the reform bill was pushed

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    Lords Cromer and Curzon were presidents of the Anti-Suffrage League. On the other hand, Lord Lytton (Constance Lytton?s brother) was president of the Men?s League for Women?s Suffrage and consistently supported female suffrage in the HoL. * In 1892 Arthur Balfour highlighted the contradiction in ?giving a vote to a

  2. How far was popular pressure the most important reason for the passing of the ...

    Moreover the working classes began to use the press to spread political knowledge this candidness put pressure on the government for reform as the masses were coming together for improvements. Additionally the defeat of Gladstone?s Bill in 1866 could have helped with the passing of the 1867 Act.

  1. How accurate is it to describe the Tory governments in the period of 1822-30 ...

    admitted that there needed to be a reduce on tariffs and taxes on imports. One of the reforms that were introduced was the reduction of custom duties on imports, this encouraged demand and stimulated the economy. It benefited the new manufacturing industries and increased employment.

  2. How liberal were the Tories from 1821 to 1827?

    It also emphasized Liverpool's wishes on free trade. Another way the government appeared more liberal was via Frederick Robinson, who had a very liberal reputation of being Chancellor of the Exchequer. He decided to reduce domestic duties on everyday, popular items such as on tea, coffee, and wool in order to encourage demand and improve the stability of the economy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work