• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a minority Tory government end up passing a far more reaching measure of parliamentary reform in1867, than its minority liberal predecessor in 1866?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did a minority Tory government end up passing a far more reaching measure of parliamentary reform in1867, than its minority liberal predecessor in 1866? After the death of the Liberal leader Palmerston in 1865, Lord John Russell replaces him as P.M. Palmerston was opposed to any types of reform and wanted to maintain the old parliamentary system, but Russell however was enthusiastic in the on the notion of parliamentary reform, he wanted the franchise extended to "respectable" literate god fearing men. However even prior to Pam's death, there were indications that the Liberal Party were edging towards reform like for example the work of John Bright a Birmingham MP who had achieved a bonds between the working and middle classes that hadn't been achieved anywhere else - this further showed that working classes could be respectable and deserving of the vote. In 1866 Gladstone proposed his Reform Bill, not very radical terms - increase franchise 200,000 in boroughs and 170,000 in the counties - redistribution of seats proposed calculated to give more of an advantage to the Liberals, however the bill did have weakness which meant it excluded the poorest householders i.e those whose property had a an annual rate of �6 or less. ...read more.

Middle

With the Liberals in decline, it was time for the Tory Party to seize the political power they had lost in the repeal of the corn laws and yearned so much since. Even though the Tories who still headed mainly for the interests of Aristocracy weren't expected to pass significant reform, the deteriorating economy and the widespread working class frustration over reform the persuaded the Tories to act quickly and pass a bill. However to a certain extent the reason the 2nd reform acts was much more far reaching than that of its liberal predecessor's in 1866 was also because of other external factors. In terms of external factors the area of high politics and pressure from below was especially significant; as the against a backdrop of trade depression and a cholera epidemic, mass agitation for reform also increased which is shown by the violent riots and demonstrations in Hyde park within the 1866-1867 period. There are also these great external social forces which also helped in building the momentum for political reform, an example of this was in the American civil war when the industrial North won over the Agrarian South which promoted slave labour because of it's thriving cotton trade. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although the Tories did initially set the ball rolling by proposing reform, eventually the bill gained momentum on its own accord, clear indication of this is how in trying to appeal the to the Radicals to get the bill through the H of C, the Tories had to imposed huge changes onto their initially simple bill; like enfranchising the previously missing �10 lodger, agreeing to Hodgkinson's amendment or abandoning their original idea of "fancy franchises". Disraeli ultimately felt that by pushing for parliamentary reform, the Conservatives might win over the previously working class factions that didn't appeal to them, who were now being enfranchised, so giving the Tories stronger grip on the suburbs and counties, In this way the Conservatives could break the long record of poor elections since and also gain the political power they were missing since the break of the party in 1847. Not only would it grant them more power, but Tories passing much more far reaching reforms in 1867 than benefited the average working man, could also challenge the age old perception that the Tories only saw the interests of the Aristocracy, and so essential in changing the public perception of the Conservatives. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. What impact did the Reform Acts of 1867 and 1884 have on the political ...

    A further argument was that supported by Gladstone who, acting on the recommendations of a Royal Commission set up to look into corrupt and illegal practices, decided that criminalizing bribery, impersonation, treating and false expense returns would be another step towards greater democracy, as would limiting the amounts that candidates could spend on elections.

  2. To what extent was Disraeli personally committed to social reform

    Indeed Disraeli later claimed that he was trying "to educate" his party, and that the Second Reform Act had "taken a happy opportunity to enlarge the privileges of the people...strengthen the institutions of the country ... and guard the rights of the people".

  1. What were the motives behind the passing of the 1867 bill?

    The bill proved to be very ineffective in extending the vote for it left too much room for dispute over who was allowed to have the vote. It took a long fifteen years for the court system to iron out many of the ambiguities, and still much of the population still didn't have the vote.

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    distant when women will also bear their share in voting for members of parliament and in determining the policy of the country.? Yet he voted against a second reading of a women?s suffrage Bill in 1891. * Conservatives in the HoL were generally opposed to female suffrage.

  1. How liberal were the Tories from 1821 to 1827?

    Robinson was not a one tricky pony however, and also managed to reduce indirect taxation between 1821 and 1827, which highlights the liberalness of the government and is also a sign that, if the government could have afforded to reduce tax, then -thanks to their reforms- economically there were doing well.

  2. Why did the Tories pass the Reform Bill in 1867?

    He feared that the accolade that would be associated with reform might go to the Conservatives. If the Liberal Party introduced reform, they would get the credit for it; therefore it can be argued that Disraeli was not a genuine supporter of reform and that the reform bill was pushed

  1. How far was popular pressure the most important reason for the passing of the ...

    Gladstone wanted to extend the electorate as he had noticed the advance of the working people by using travelling opportunities for public speaking. Gladstone was always received well by the public who were impressed by his ideas of reform. His Reform Bill came with mild conditions and split the Whigs,

  2. How accurate is it to describe the Tory governments in the period of 1822-30 ...

    admitted that there needed to be a reduce on tariffs and taxes on imports. One of the reforms that were introduced was the reduction of custom duties on imports, this encouraged demand and stimulated the economy. It benefited the new manufacturing industries and increased employment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work