• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a minority Tory government end up passing a far more reaching measure of parliamentary reform in1867, than its minority liberal predecessor in 1866?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did a minority Tory government end up passing a far more reaching measure of parliamentary reform in1867, than its minority liberal predecessor in 1866? After the death of the Liberal leader Palmerston in 1865, Lord John Russell replaces him as P.M. Palmerston was opposed to any types of reform and wanted to maintain the old parliamentary system, but Russell however was enthusiastic in the on the notion of parliamentary reform, he wanted the franchise extended to "respectable" literate god fearing men. However even prior to Pam's death, there were indications that the Liberal Party were edging towards reform like for example the work of John Bright a Birmingham MP who had achieved a bonds between the working and middle classes that hadn't been achieved anywhere else - this further showed that working classes could be respectable and deserving of the vote. In 1866 Gladstone proposed his Reform Bill, not very radical terms - increase franchise 200,000 in boroughs and 170,000 in the counties - redistribution of seats proposed calculated to give more of an advantage to the Liberals, however the bill did have weakness which meant it excluded the poorest householders i.e those whose property had a an annual rate of �6 or less. ...read more.

Middle

With the Liberals in decline, it was time for the Tory Party to seize the political power they had lost in the repeal of the corn laws and yearned so much since. Even though the Tories who still headed mainly for the interests of Aristocracy weren't expected to pass significant reform, the deteriorating economy and the widespread working class frustration over reform the persuaded the Tories to act quickly and pass a bill. However to a certain extent the reason the 2nd reform acts was much more far reaching than that of its liberal predecessor's in 1866 was also because of other external factors. In terms of external factors the area of high politics and pressure from below was especially significant; as the against a backdrop of trade depression and a cholera epidemic, mass agitation for reform also increased which is shown by the violent riots and demonstrations in Hyde park within the 1866-1867 period. There are also these great external social forces which also helped in building the momentum for political reform, an example of this was in the American civil war when the industrial North won over the Agrarian South which promoted slave labour because of it's thriving cotton trade. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although the Tories did initially set the ball rolling by proposing reform, eventually the bill gained momentum on its own accord, clear indication of this is how in trying to appeal the to the Radicals to get the bill through the H of C, the Tories had to imposed huge changes onto their initially simple bill; like enfranchising the previously missing �10 lodger, agreeing to Hodgkinson's amendment or abandoning their original idea of "fancy franchises". Disraeli ultimately felt that by pushing for parliamentary reform, the Conservatives might win over the previously working class factions that didn't appeal to them, who were now being enfranchised, so giving the Tories stronger grip on the suburbs and counties, In this way the Conservatives could break the long record of poor elections since and also gain the political power they were missing since the break of the party in 1847. Not only would it grant them more power, but Tories passing much more far reaching reforms in 1867 than benefited the average working man, could also challenge the age old perception that the Tories only saw the interests of the Aristocracy, and so essential in changing the public perception of the Conservatives. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent were the Tory reforms, 1822-1830, 'liberal' and 'enlightened'?

    sign agreements with other countries to access each other's ships freely; and the Modification of the Corn Laws (1828), which allowed the free transport of foreign wheat if British wheat sold at 7s a quarter, and this was subject to a sliding scale.

  2. To what extent was Disraeli personally committed to social reform

    and guard the rights of the people". We can see from this, that Disraeli was inclined to do what he believed was best in the interests of himself and his party, which in this case was to use the subject of reform as a tool to enhance public opinion.

  1. What impact did the Reform Acts of 1867 and 1884 have on the political ...

    Both major parties began establishing local clubs and organizations. The Liberal founded Working Men's Clubs and the Conservatives the constitutional Clubs (Working-class orientated) and Conservative Associations. These groups helped educate new voters and socialize them as well. So to sum up, the impact of the 1867 and 1884-85 was great

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    went on hunger strike, this became the protest weapon of choice for imprisoned suffragettes. * At first, hunger strikers were released from prison. Then the Government, terrified of a hunger striking suffragette dying in prison and anxious not to create a martyr for the cause introduced forcible feeding.

  1. How liberal were the Tories from 1821 to 1827?

    Changing the shape of the economy however was not the only goal of this new 'liberal-type' of Conservatism. Social reforms were also made to liberalise government and country. The man in charge of the social reforms was Robert Peel, who was too seen as enlightened and liberal.

  2. Why did the Tories pass the Reform Bill in 1867?

    He feared that the accolade that would be associated with reform might go to the Conservatives. If the Liberal Party introduced reform, they would get the credit for it; therefore it can be argued that Disraeli was not a genuine supporter of reform and that the reform bill was pushed

  1. How far was popular pressure the most important reason for the passing of the ...

    Gladstone wanted to extend the electorate as he had noticed the advance of the working people by using travelling opportunities for public speaking. Gladstone was always received well by the public who were impressed by his ideas of reform. His Reform Bill came with mild conditions and split the Whigs,

  2. How accurate is it to describe the Tory governments in the period of 1822-30 ...

    admitted that there needed to be a reduce on tariffs and taxes on imports. One of the reforms that were introduced was the reduction of custom duties on imports, this encouraged demand and stimulated the economy. It benefited the new manufacturing industries and increased employment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work