• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the foreign policy of Henry VIII fail in the years 1514-1525?

Extracts from this document...


The failure of foreign policy in the years 1514-1525 can be attributed to many things. Undoubtedly, England?s small size and its lack of resources were a factor. In source 4 we read that ?[Henry] finally accepted the fact that royal finances could not support a repetition of the campaign of 1513? so he made peace with France. Here, Henry?s lack of resources seems to be the dominant reason for not pursuing his aim of winning the French crown. However, much must have depended on diplomatic relations with Maximilian and Ferdinand -?[Henry?s] allies proved unscrupulous and unreliable. ...read more.


Again had England been more resourceful it could have aligned the balance of power and hence preserved The Treaty of London. The letter from Archbishop Warham in source 6 tell us that people didn?t want to pay the Amicable Grant for another expedition into France on various grounds. Some lacked the resources ?Some would give but cannot?. Some say that ?last loan is not repaid and nor will this be? the reason of which is again lack of resources and Henry?s imprudence in spending money. Yet others do not see the point of invading France considering the last invasion which ?have not gained the King a foot more land than his father had?. ...read more.


In 400 years the perspective with which we look might change, altering the whole meaning of an event. Another reason for Henry?s failure might be indecisiveness and constant switching of allies. Had England allied itself with Spain from the very beginning eventually it would have benefited greatly. Instead the alliances were constantly changed which encouraged betrayals and plotting. All in all, Henry?s foreign policy failed mainly because of his lack of resources. England could not be involved in the political game at the highest level nor could it make any difference in military because other countries were much more wealthy and powerful.Other factors such as unskilled foreign politics must have played a role yet it was not as significant as the inability to pay for war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Charles V fail to crush Luther?

    Charles had to govern lands across Europe. These included the Burgundian lands, Spain, The Netherlands and Austria to name but a few. During the Lutheran period Charles was extremely busy in fending off threats to such areas, including the spreading Ottoman Empire and the French in Italy.

  2. How far did Henry VIII achieve his aims 1509 - 1514?

    to arrest Epsom and Dudley, two people who were hated amongst the nobles. Their execution would have put the new king in favour with the nobles, after their discontent towards Henry VII. To undo more of his father's damage towards the nobles, Henry abolished the council learned in 1510.

  1. Henry VIII foreign policy

    Due to Henry being a young king he would also be seen as a weak one. This would then put security as a big aim of his.

  2. What Methods did Henry VIII and Wolsey use to achieve the aims of Foreign ...

    In fact Henry had to spend lots of money building up the fortifications at Tournai. But Maximilian was pleased because two French fortresses that were potential threat to his Burgundy territory were no longer threats and so he too signed a peace deal with France.

  1. Is it fair to describe Bevin as a great foreign secretary?

    Despite months of protracted negotiation, no settlement on a Federal India was put in place. Bevin gave full negotiating powers to the new Viceroy and set a firm deadline for an agreement and settlement of Indian Independence. Eventually India had to be partitioned, creating Pakistan, East Pakistan and India itself.

  2. How successful was Wolseys foreign policy in satisfying the ambitions of Henry VIII in ...

    Despite this Henry personally lead an army of 25,000 across the channel and took Thérouanne and Tournai in northern France and winning memorable battles such as the battle of the spurs. Wolsey was the Quarter-Master generally rather than the war minister.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work