• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the foreign policy of Henry VIII fail in the years 1514-1525?

Extracts from this document...


The failure of foreign policy in the years 1514-1525 can be attributed to many things. Undoubtedly, England?s small size and its lack of resources were a factor. In source 4 we read that ?[Henry] finally accepted the fact that royal finances could not support a repetition of the campaign of 1513? so he made peace with France. Here, Henry?s lack of resources seems to be the dominant reason for not pursuing his aim of winning the French crown. However, much must have depended on diplomatic relations with Maximilian and Ferdinand -?[Henry?s] allies proved unscrupulous and unreliable. ...read more.


Again had England been more resourceful it could have aligned the balance of power and hence preserved The Treaty of London. The letter from Archbishop Warham in source 6 tell us that people didn?t want to pay the Amicable Grant for another expedition into France on various grounds. Some lacked the resources ?Some would give but cannot?. Some say that ?last loan is not repaid and nor will this be? the reason of which is again lack of resources and Henry?s imprudence in spending money. Yet others do not see the point of invading France considering the last invasion which ?have not gained the King a foot more land than his father had?. ...read more.


In 400 years the perspective with which we look might change, altering the whole meaning of an event. Another reason for Henry?s failure might be indecisiveness and constant switching of allies. Had England allied itself with Spain from the very beginning eventually it would have benefited greatly. Instead the alliances were constantly changed which encouraged betrayals and plotting. All in all, Henry?s foreign policy failed mainly because of his lack of resources. England could not be involved in the political game at the highest level nor could it make any difference in military because other countries were much more wealthy and powerful.Other factors such as unskilled foreign politics must have played a role yet it was not as significant as the inability to pay for war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How far did Henry VIII achieve his aims 1509 - 1514?

    This would also have gained respect from the nobles, as the council learned was very unpopular. Henry also allowed easy access to his presence through his court and the privy chamber, which meant nobles were more involved with Henry, which made them feel more important and influential, which would therefore put them on better terms with Henry.

  2. Henry VIII foreign policy

    The holy league and treaty of London are examples of were nations have got together to maintain a balance of power. Although Charles did stop the treaty and upsetting the balance more by becoming a super power in Europe. The league of cognac in 1526 was though set up by

  1. Is it fair to describe Bevin as a great foreign secretary?

    Despite months of protracted negotiation, no settlement on a Federal India was put in place. Bevin gave full negotiating powers to the new Viceroy and set a firm deadline for an agreement and settlement of Indian Independence. Eventually India had to be partitioned, creating Pakistan, East Pakistan and India itself.

  2. Why did Charles V fail to crush Luther?

    They therefore saw Luther, an enemy of papacy, as a potential ally and were more likely to listen and spread his message. The money that stayed in their states was a valuable source to tax but it also ensured social stability which could only benefit the state itself and therefore the position of the state leaders.

  1. What Methods did Henry VIII and Wolsey use to achieve the aims of Foreign ...

    Henry wanted to enter Europe as the Warrior king by getting glory in France and needed alliances to support him however these were very feeble and did not benefit Henry. Henry knew that he required alliances to gain military success in France since England was not strong enough to fight alone.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    This is supported by Ives (2007, pg 84) investigative source on Henry?s participation in war in the 1540s, as he claims that King Henry took a military approach to his policies for the reason that he wanted to quench his earlier desires ?to re-open the Hundred Years? War and achieve

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work