• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there so little opposition to the Henrician Reformation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was there so little opposition to the Henrician Reformation? The Henrician reformation brought many changes to the religious and secular ways of life in England. It stripped the nation of many of its traditional Catholic ways and forced new and unheard of customs into its religious life. The monasteries were dissolved deceitfully and effectively and a once cherished tradition was brought to an abrupt end. Henry agreed to have an English Bible in his churches, something that had previously been considered an act of heresy. Other Catholic traditions such as holy relics and the belief in purgatory were discouraged in the newly revised faith. Cromwell initiated these changes to the faith, but Henry's Catholic faith ensured these changes were not too radical and chantries were still allowed to pray for souls in purgatory. Although Henry remained a Catholic, the end of papal power was signified in his becoming the head of the Church of England. However, with such movements that shook the foundations of England's faith, why was there so little opposition to the Henrician reformation? Perhaps on of the greatest tactics employed by the crown to prevent opposition was provoking fear amongst those who were likely to oppose the reformation. Henry had to start from the top, and therefore started by controlling parliament. A few bishops that had once made up a considerable part of parliament ( such as Bishop Fisher) ...read more.

Middle

For example, the 'Glass of truth' was published in which Henry (partly with his own hand) wrote a clear and short version of the law of Leviticus that he argued required him to divorce Catherine of Aragon. The government also prefaced all its new statutes with propagandist material before they were distributed throughout the country. However, it is difficult to determine just how much effect propaganda had upon the people, as a great majority of them were illiterate. This problem of illiteracy was why the pulpit was used as a major force of propaganda. Priests were told to preach sermons in support of the Royal Supremacy, and as the people listening wanted to believe everything their priest told them, they soon accepted the new ideas. Many of Henry's critics did not share the same views in their opposition to the reformation. They all came from different backgrounds and therefore had different reasons for opposing. Some protested against the divorce, some with the dissolution of the monasteries, some against the changes to doctrine and some against the break with Rome. A.G. Dickens said that there was "No one organized group, there was no leader....and it seemed to have very different objectives". The Pope gave no lead to English Catholics to encourage them to oppose or rebel against the reformation. ...read more.

Conclusion

as many of the fundamental aspects of people's remained unchanged during the 1530's; such as their lifestyle and to some extent the doctrine remained mainly Catholic e.g. belief in transubstantiation). It was also far from clear what the end result would be of the Reformation. Even those few in touch with the events of the reformation had little idea that the changes would finally produce reformist ideas. Some people however welcomed the reformation and Protestantism, especially in court in the forms of Cromwell, Anne Boleyn and Cramner. Consequently, it can be understood why there was little cause for opposition to the reformation, when it caused little disruption and for many brought benefits to some people. Therefore it seems that a combination of tactics meant there was little opposition to the Henrician Reformation. Cromwell was an essential catalyst in making the reformation work; without his level of intelligence and ability to manipulate the reformation quite possibly may have encountered a great deal of opposition. The piecemeal and indeed relatively peaceful way in which the reformation occurred meant that people were rarely shocked by sudden change and that many would remain ignorant or unaffected by the changes that did occur. A lesser monarch might have been engulfed by the challenges such as the Pilgrimage of Grace, yet Henry and Cromwell remained consistent, and with an element of luck about the time that the changed were introduced, the Henrician reformation was successful and faced surprisingly little opposition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The English Church was popular and effective on the eve of the Henrician Reformation ...

    John Colet, another humanist scholar, friend of Erasmus and Dean of St. Paul's Cathedral in London, preached a sermon in Convocation, before the Canterbury and York clergies, attacking the major problems and abuses within the Church, which was mainly the clergy.

  2. The Henrician Reformation.

    Henry knew that there was a threat from foreign power and was aware of the good financial income from closing the monasteries. For example, in 1534 the Act for First Fruits and Tenths took away the revenue of the Church which in the first year rose over �40,000.

  1. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    Dancing around May Poles was banned. Many inns were shut and popular sports of bull and bear baiting were prohibited. Nobody was allowed to work or even play football on Sundays! Even Christmas day was made a day of fasting. This was strictly enforced with soldiers used to remove meat from ovens in London homes.

  2. 'Without the Divorce Crisis, there would not have been a Henrician Reformation.' Discuss.

    Wolsey argued the Pope had no right to 'set aside divine law'. However, this did not turn out to be a very good argument, because in the Old Testament, it was written that a man was able to marry his brother's wife after he died, if her marriage had not been consummated.

  1. Using all the sources and your own knowledge, assess to what extent the dissolution ...

    led to 'the high displeasure of Almighty God' and 'the great ill repute of the king's highness'. The wording of this Act was designed to justify Henry's move to dissolve the church but was to some extent true about a number of church organisations at the time.

  2. Why was there so little opposition to Royal Supremacy and the break with Rome?

    This was to enable the king to proceed with his plans and also to act as a stern caution of deterrence to others, further diminishing the already few numbers of active challengers. The king agreed with Cromwell that all their actions should be taken properly and be made lawfully secure.

  1. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    So, first of all the reader can see how unfair it is. The poet also makes her feelings clear by the sheer joy she has in telling the employer that she is leaving and from now on she can do her dirty work herself.

  2. How serious was the opposition to the Henrican Reformation?

    The party included leading members of English society including the Lord Chancellor Thomas More. Thomas More greatly aided the Queen's party as he acted as an informer of impending government policies. The Queen's party reacted by countering such policies by the means of public sermons and propagandist treatises.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work