• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Criminal law - The Theft Act 1968

Extracts from this document...


Criminal Law Semester 2 LW 107 Section 1 (1) of the Theft Act 1968 creates the legal definition of theft that is: 'A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it'. Each various area f this definition are explained in sections 2 to 6 of the act. In the case of R v Gomez [1993] AC 442 a number of areas was needed to be resolved upon deciding the case especially when dealing with appropriation. S 3 (1) gives the legal definition of appropriation as: 'any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner amounts to an appropriation, and this includes, where he has come by the property (innocently or not) without stealing it, any later assumption of a right to it by keeping or dealing with it as owner'. There are two problematic issues relating to the meaning of 'appropriation' which the court has tried to deal with in recent years. ...read more.


But it depends on weather it is an honest appropriation or a dishonest one. If it is an honest appropriation no theft has been committed, as you do not have to just leave the building in order o commit theft. Leaving the building or make off without payment is simply proof that the shopper committed theft. A dishonest appropriation can constitute theft if the shopper knows that they will leave without paying, even if the supermarket consents to the appropriation of goods off the shelf. There is an assumption of rights of the owner, which is to purchase before leaving the store (in reference to Lawrence) As the Theft Act did not recognize weather appropriation could occur with or without the owner's consent the courts had to resolve this problem. In Lawrence [1971] 2 All ER 1253 HL the courts held that even the foreigner held his wallet out and permitted the taxi driver to take his money it amounted to appropriation even though it was consented. The court said there was a clear appropriation by s 3 (1) ...read more.


The case of R v Hinks (2000) reinforced he position in Gomez hat appropriation was a neutral word within the meaning of theft act and even the acquisition of good title or legitimate ownership, was capable to amounting to appropriation. The court also said there can be theft of a gift if the recipient is dishonest. S 3(2) of the Theft Act provides for appropriation where the original possession of property was innocent. Although if the original possession of the goods was not innocent, later assumption of the same goods would not be theft according to R v Atakpu [1993]. In this case the defendant hired cars with false documents, which amounted to an appropriation. In conclusion the law in this area is no that satisfied. The cases of Morris and Gomez have widened the spectrum. The result in Gomez may have conflicted with civil law. As in Hinks the court held the recipient of a valid gift might be said to have appropriated the gift. Most of the elements under s15 of the theft Act are identical to theft. The difference is deception is needed in an s 15 offences. Since Gomez almost all cases of obtaining goods by deception will also be thefts. 80127410 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Jury (Criminal & Civil Trials)

    4 star(s)

    Juries sit in a few civil cases, in particular, defamation and cases involving the state. Juries also sit in coroner's courts for more contentious inquests. All juries consist of 12 people between 18-70 years of age, selected at random from the register of voters.

  2. To advise Reggie, it is necessary to look at the law of adverse possession. ...

    Even so, this argument may not be strong enough to help Reggie win the title of the property. In conclusion, Reggie would be able to claim the land if he can prove that in 1979, there was a 'new' adverse possession and the 12 years of limitation period had passed (1979-1993)

  1. Sanctions available in criminal Law

    Another example of a suspended sentence is Community Payback which requires the offender to complete a certain amount of hours of unpaid work. Determinate prison sentences If for example a judge gives a two year sentence then it is a determinate sentence as the sentence is fixed.

  2. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    and Markfield Investment Ltd v Evans7 are among the cases which visualize how the squatters can easily declared as the owner of the owned land by only established the prerequisite of 12 years occupation on the land when the case was brought before the court.

  1. The first issue that arises here is A's act of taking his father's railway ...

    The mens rea of this offence includes dishonesty, laid under Section 2 of Theft Act 1968. To determine dishonesty, the Ghosh test applies. It should be established that A's act was dishonest according to the standards of ordinary reasonable people.

  2. Outline many of the basic elements of law that relate to business and marketing.

    This means that if victims identify a scam, either before or after being conned, sometimes they cannot even take legal action against the person(s) because they cannot be identified. The media release sourced from ASIC tells of an organisation of 18 different parties working to combat fraud.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work