• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Criminal liability is generally based on fault with the prosecution having to prove both actus reus and mens rea. Some criminal offences are crimes of strict liability. Briefly explain the meaning of these 3 terms.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Criminal liability is generally based on fault with the prosecution having to prove both actus reus and mens rea. Some criminal offences are crimes of strict liability. Briefly explain the meaning of these 3 terms. The actus reus is the physical element of a crime. The phrase itself is loosely translated as `the guilty act'. The actus reus however does not always have to be some one committing an act it could also be the failure to act (an omission). The actus reus of a crime may also be committed when a prohibited state of affairs exists. In some crimes it is also necessary to show more than an act or failure to act. What you also need to show is that specific consequences of an act occurred before the actus reus is proven. An example of the actus for a state of affairs which is when a defendant may commit the actus reus simply by being in a particular place when this state of affairs has been declared to be wrong - Larsonnneur (1993) and Winzar v Chief constable of Kent (1983) ...read more.

Middle

Where there is a duty to act under a contract - R v Pittwood (1902) 2. Where a duty exists because there is a special relationship between the parties - R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) 3. Where a duty exists because the defendant has voluntarily accepted responsibility for another - R v Stone and Dobinson (1977) 4. Where the defendant has caused a dangerous situation and he has failed to put it right - R v Miller (1983) 5. Where a duty exists because of a persons public office - R v Dytham (1979) However in the case of a doctor if he failed to give medical treatment if the discontinuance of the treatment is in the patients best interest he will not have committed the actus reus. The mens rea is the mental element of a crime and if it is literally translated then it means guilty mind. The mens rea has got nothing to do with motive. Each crime will have an individual mens rea. In statutory offences the mens rea is often defined by words such as maliciously, intentionally, recklessly and wilfully. ...read more.

Conclusion

However R v G (2003) the house of lords decided that Cunningham recklessness will be used for all criminal offences. Gross negligence is the necessary mens rea for manslaughter as used in the case of R v Adomako. Strict liability is when a crime can be committed and then some one can be convicted without proof of mens rea. An example of this is Larsonneur (1933) where the defendant had no mens rea when committing the offence of `being an alien to whom leave to land in the UK had been refused.' She did not mean to commit this offence but had been brought to the UK against her will. Strict liability offences are in place to protect something or some one. Some examples of these are to protect the public from unfit food or protect children from buying teenagers and been taken in by gambling. They are used for thing such as the regulation of road traffic. It is left to the courts to decide if an offence is one of strict liability. To decide if a case is one of strict liability it must be decided if the case is truly criminal or regulatory and if it is then regulatory this then means it is strict liability. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which discrimination is prohibited under English and Welsh law (25 ...

    5 star(s)

    It was later held that the Employment protection (consolidation) act (1978) was incredibly discriminatory towards women since more men than women are able to work full-time. The impact of EU law must acknowledge in shaping our current legislative protection as EU law is about free trade, EU law looks at

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    In sports cases this would be similar to consent for example if a tackle ended in injury. Finally the defence of necessity can be used and this defence is essentially that the defendant's action was necessary to prevent greater damage to the defendant or third party.

  1. Consider the meaning and importance of fault-based liability in English law

    Also, in R v Mitchell, the defendant pushed a man in a queue, who in turn fell against another, who in turn fell against an elderly lady who had to have an operation from which she died. The Court of Appeal ruled that transferred malice applied to unlawful act manslaughter.

  2. Examine the arguments for and against strict liability illustrating your answer with example of ...

    Also in Bradish 1990 the defendant was unaware that a canister in his possession contained prohibited CS gas. Once again it was upheld. Another reason for strict liability is that the public gains grater protections from pollution in the case of Alphacell v Woodward (1972)

  1. Gross negligence and recklessness.

    He argued that in popular speech there is no distinction between the person who recognises a risk and goes on nevertheless and the person who never addresses his mind to the obvious risk at all. The law, said Diplock, should not perpetuate 'fine and impracticable distinctions'.

  2. Briefly Explain The Meaning Of These Terms: Actus Reus And Mens Rea

    The failure to act is known as omission; the principle of this is that failure to act is not liable except if it is someone's contractual responsibility to act.

  1. The terms Actus Reus and Mens Rea

    This view is supported by Lord Reid's dictum in the Thabo Meli v R.2 case: "It is said that the mens rea necessary to establish murder is the intention to kill, and that there could be no intention to kill when the accused thought the man was already dead, so

  2. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    A tort, in common law jurisdictions, is a civil wrong. Tort law deals with situations where a person's behavior has unfairly caused someone else to suffer loss or harm. Although the laws of tort and contract both deal with obligations, in the case of a contract the parties are voluntarily assuming obligations whereas tortuous liability is compulsorily imposed by law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work