• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Description of the jury system

Extracts from this document...


Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system The jury system has been in use for hundreds of years and was confirmed under Magna Carta 1215, however the system of trial by jury can be traced back to the reign of Henry II (1154-1189). The system by which we are familiar with today, i.e. juries giving verdicts on the basis of what is related to them by witnesses at the court hearing was coming into prominence in trials of serious offences as early as the fifteenth century. The jury is found in the Crown Court and sit for indictable offences. Juries consist of 12 people of either sex, swearing on the Bible or equivalent religious text, swear to: "Well and truly try the case and give a true verdict according to the evidence". The law on juries is governed by the Juries Act 1974, as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1988 and the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. Qualification for jury service is attainable if a person meets the following criteria: i. Their name appears on the electoral register; i.e. ...read more.


Ultimately the jury's job is to decide on whether the defendant is guilty or not based on the facts presented to them from the prosecution and the defence. Prior to 1967 the verdict had to be unanimous. However, as quite often all 12 jury members failed to agree, retrials were required- these were (and still are) very expensive and, during the time between trials, jurors could be pressurised or bribed. In 1967 majority verdicts were introduced under the Criminal Justice Act. Majority verdicts apply in two situations. 1) After the jury has retired to the jury room for at least 2 hours and, 2) not less than 10 out of 11 or 12 jurors or 9 out of 10 jurors have agreed on the verdict. Any other majority and the jury are 'hung' and a retrial may be ordered as an only alternative to dropping charges. Prior to a trial in the Crown Court, a panel of jurors (usually 15 or 16) are summoned to attend court, a duty which is an offence should they not attend. From the 15 or 16 jurors, 12 are chosen using a ballot in open court. ...read more.


Very rarely, juries are used in civil cases, though under the Supreme Court Act 1981 any civil court has the discretion to use a jury provided one of the parties applies. Civil juries are occasionally used in cases of false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and malicious falsehood. However, they are used in cases of defamation. In these cases, the jurors have to decide if a person was defamed and they also have to decide on the amount of damages to be awarded. This often causes great problems as the juries award obscene amounts of damages such as in the Jeffery Archer Case when the author was awarded an astonishing �500,000 damages. The system of trial by jury has been successfully used in society for hundreds of years. Anything that has remained in such constant use over such a long period of time must be deemed to be worthwhile keeping. Although various alternatives have been suggested to the jury system, no one has been able to fathom a superior way to decide on the defendant's fate. It has to be said that the system of trial by jury is used to the advantage of the public and, until any other superior alternative is introduced, it will continue to be an asset to society. ?? ?? ?? ?? GCSE Law/ Jury (a) Nabeel Nawaz ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    'There is no power to create specifically a racial or gender balance or indeed imbalance, on a jury, other than by the random selection process itself' (Davies et al, 1998:209). It has been declared by many academics that random jury selection will never 'guarantee a representative jury' (Sanders & Young, 2000:564).

  2. 'Juries are anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard.' To what extent do you think that this ...

    They may be fellow motorists and think there may be fellow motorists and think " there, but for the grace of God, go I." Although jurors receive payment for traveling expenses,etc and an allowance for loss of earnings, it is probable that many people suffer financial loss.

  1. Trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice and more than one ...

    Besides that, in some cases like R v Young and R v Karakaya, where both of this cases concern with the jury using unreliable means of coming to a decision.

  2. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    The case load is vast and the trials are complex and lengthy. If we were to introduce a formalised system of plea bargaining into the English legal system then the current system would be even more cost-effective and efficient. Plea bargaining would ultimately attract guilty pleas and an initial guilty

  1. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    This factor however remains an issue. In addition, although under duty, people do not undertake their job as a juror. Jury duty is as popular as paying taxes. The jury system is inherently flawed. Aside from the selection process, it still remains far from ideal.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    At the court jurors are usually divided into groups of fifteen and allocated to a court. The court clerk selects twelve out of the fifteen at random. If there are not sufficient jurors to hear all the cases scheduled for that day at the court, there is a special power

  1. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    Further research into the effects of the labelling process have yielded a mixture of results. Some findings have been interpreted as showing that labelling has no effect on the individual (Hirschi 1975:198), while others suggest that people experiment with

  2. The English Court System

    as of right, but leave of the court is needed for other reasons. And if leave refused, convicted person may appeal to the Home Secretary, who has the power to refer the case back to the Court of Appeal. The House of Lords is the second chamber of the UK Parliament.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work