• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Murder and Voluntary manslaughter - analysis of cases and the plea of involuntary manslaughter.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Murder and Voluntary manslaughter Murder: The unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the kings or queens peace with malice aforethought, express or implied. Actus rues of murder: unlawful killing- 'unjust killing': This means that a death was caused by another person, without lawful excuse . This includes murder and manslaughter and causing death by dangerous driving. However the death may be the result not of a positive act but of an omission, or a failure to act. A reasonable person in being; those concerning the opposite ends of human existence . Human, homoisapian, brain-dead human. Foetus is not human. 'Under the queens peace': the killing of an enemy in war is not murder, as such a person us not 'under the queens peace'. It would, however, be considered the Actus Reus of murder to kill a prisoner of war. Causation: Causation is the link between the defendants act and the criminal consequence. The rules are applied to decide whether the defendants guilty act caused the required consequence in the definition of a particular crime Causation : Causation is the link between the defendants act and the criminal consequence. ...read more.

Middle

Name of Case: Jordan 1956 Legal Facts: Defendant stabbed victim, who was taken to hospital, a week later the wound was almost healed, doctors gave him incorrect injection and he died. Judicial principle: the medical treatment was 'palpably wrong' and would not have 'precluded' a jury from holding that death which was caused by the defendants action. Name of Case: Smith 1959 Legal Facts: Defendant stabbed Victim, which cause the victim to have a pierced lung. At the first aid post the medical officer was busy and took some time to get the victim that died about an hour after the stabbing. Judicial principle: the treatment he was given was thoroughly bad and might well have affected his chances of recovery, but medical treatment correct or not correct does not break the chain of causation, at the time of the death the original wound was still an operating cause and a substantial cause, then the death can be said to be a result of the wound that some other cause is also operating. ...read more.

Conclusion

Name of Case: Roberts 1971 Legal Facts: defendant was in a car with a victim who was the passenger in the defendants car she injured herself by jumping out the car as she claimed that the defendant sexually attacked her. Judicial Principle: it was held that 'Occasioning' in ABH relates to causation and is an objective test. If the common assault was intentional there is no need to consider recklessness. The proper test for 'occasioning' is not whether the defendant actually foresaw the conduct of the victim which resulted in the actual bodily harm, but whether that conduct could have reasonable foresee as the consequence of what he was doing or saying. Name Of Case: Williams 1992 Legal Facts: Defendant picked up a hitchhiker who was the victim and allegedly tried to rob him. The victim jumped from the car at about 30mph, and suffered head injuries from which he died. Judicial Principle: the victims own act might be unreasonable and so break the chain of causation. Therefore the victim caused its own injuries. The Homicide Act 1957, S3 Yes No Subjective Test: Objective Test: No Yes Yes Voluntary manslaughter: Diminished responsibility: http://sixthformlaw.info/02_cases/mod3a/cases_34_vol_provocation.htm#Bedder,%20R%20v%20%281954%29%20HL ?? ?? ?? ?? Law notes unit 3A- Criminal law ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Murder - Notes and Evaluation.

    4 star(s)

    It could be argued that the definition of murder is too broad, for example, a person who kills but only intends to cause serious bodily harm and who may not even foresee the possibility of death occurring can be convicted of murder.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Voluntary Manslaghter - Notes and Evaluation.

    3 star(s)

    matters, the ability to form a rational judgment as to whether an act is right or wrong, and the ability to exercise willpower to control physical acts in accordance with that rational judgment. This final point covers 'irresistible impulse', as in Byrne's case, where he could not resist his perverted desires.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    There have been attempts at persuading parliament to pass new law on murder but parliament has not been prepared to give the necessary time to enact the law. The draft criminal code produced in 1989 changed the intention of GBH to intention to do GBH and foresight of death, but a draft is still a draft and isn't law.

  2. Law A2 unit 4 murder problem answer plan

    as it can't be judged as to whether his act could cause injury to Derek. The criminal act that Charles did was to make Derek frightened to attack him, but Charles didn't actually inflict any harm or injuries on Derek so his act may be classed as dangerous enough to cause death.

  1. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    The two defendants argued that when the hospital switched off the machines the chain of causation was broken, thereby relieving the defendants of liability for murder. The court rejected the argument on the ground that the original injuries were still an operative cause of their victim's death.

  2. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    illness, it might have been decided that only mental illness could be included in the M?Naghten rules. In Kemp, the defendant suffered from a physical illness known as arteriosclerosis, which caused the arteries to harden, causing congestion of blood on the brain.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    However, if there is a low chance of the risk materialising but if it does then a high potential of serious injury then extra precautions should be taken as in Paris v Stepney where the employee had lost sight in one eye but was not supplied with goggles and ended up being blinded.

  2. Sources of the English Legal System and the Relationship between Legislation and Judicial ...

    include; Queen in Parliament, House of Lords, and the House of Commons. A Royal Assent is needed by the Queen before a proposed bill becomes a law. Thirdly, another source of law is the Statutory Interpretation. This is referred to the way judges interpret statutes and laws in the court of law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work