• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Murder and Voluntary manslaughter - analysis of cases and the plea of involuntary manslaughter.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Murder and Voluntary manslaughter Murder: The unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the kings or queens peace with malice aforethought, express or implied. Actus rues of murder: unlawful killing- 'unjust killing': This means that a death was caused by another person, without lawful excuse . This includes murder and manslaughter and causing death by dangerous driving. However the death may be the result not of a positive act but of an omission, or a failure to act. A reasonable person in being; those concerning the opposite ends of human existence . Human, homoisapian, brain-dead human. Foetus is not human. 'Under the queens peace': the killing of an enemy in war is not murder, as such a person us not 'under the queens peace'. It would, however, be considered the Actus Reus of murder to kill a prisoner of war. Causation: Causation is the link between the defendants act and the criminal consequence. The rules are applied to decide whether the defendants guilty act caused the required consequence in the definition of a particular crime Causation : Causation is the link between the defendants act and the criminal consequence. ...read more.

Middle

Name of Case: Jordan 1956 Legal Facts: Defendant stabbed victim, who was taken to hospital, a week later the wound was almost healed, doctors gave him incorrect injection and he died. Judicial principle: the medical treatment was 'palpably wrong' and would not have 'precluded' a jury from holding that death which was caused by the defendants action. Name of Case: Smith 1959 Legal Facts: Defendant stabbed Victim, which cause the victim to have a pierced lung. At the first aid post the medical officer was busy and took some time to get the victim that died about an hour after the stabbing. Judicial principle: the treatment he was given was thoroughly bad and might well have affected his chances of recovery, but medical treatment correct or not correct does not break the chain of causation, at the time of the death the original wound was still an operating cause and a substantial cause, then the death can be said to be a result of the wound that some other cause is also operating. ...read more.

Conclusion

Name of Case: Roberts 1971 Legal Facts: defendant was in a car with a victim who was the passenger in the defendants car she injured herself by jumping out the car as she claimed that the defendant sexually attacked her. Judicial Principle: it was held that 'Occasioning' in ABH relates to causation and is an objective test. If the common assault was intentional there is no need to consider recklessness. The proper test for 'occasioning' is not whether the defendant actually foresaw the conduct of the victim which resulted in the actual bodily harm, but whether that conduct could have reasonable foresee as the consequence of what he was doing or saying. Name Of Case: Williams 1992 Legal Facts: Defendant picked up a hitchhiker who was the victim and allegedly tried to rob him. The victim jumped from the car at about 30mph, and suffered head injuries from which he died. Judicial Principle: the victims own act might be unreasonable and so break the chain of causation. Therefore the victim caused its own injuries. The Homicide Act 1957, S3 Yes No Subjective Test: Objective Test: No Yes Yes Voluntary manslaughter: Diminished responsibility: http://sixthformlaw.info/02_cases/mod3a/cases_34_vol_provocation.htm#Bedder,%20R%20v%20%281954%29%20HL ?? ?? ?? ?? Law notes unit 3A- Criminal law ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Murder - Notes and Evaluation.

    4 star(s)

    Another problem with the definition of murder is that the actus reus involves the death of a 'person in being', which excludes the death of a foetus. This means that if a pregnant woman is killed, the defendant cannot be convicted for the death of the child as it is

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Voluntary Manslaghter - Notes and Evaluation.

    3 star(s)

    as substantially impaired his mental responsibility for his acts and omission in doing or being a party to the killing." The burden of proving Diminished Responsibility is on the defendant, unlike other defences; this is because everybody is presumed to be sane unless proven otherwise.

  1. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    The two defendants argued that when the hospital switched off the machines the chain of causation was broken, thereby relieving the defendants of liability for murder. The court rejected the argument on the ground that the original injuries were still an operative cause of their victim's death.

  2. Property Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Police Powers of Search and Entry.

    Define the following offences, outlining the differences between them. A) Murder - This is the act of killing another human being; with malice aforethought. It's defined as the intention to kill or to cause bodily harm. For example, there was a case D lost his temper with his three-month-old

  1. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    Collins says that this is the paradigm of theft. He clearly did appropriate the property, as taking it away is a right only the owner has. Lawrence and Gomez makes it clear that consent to or authorisation by the owner of the taking by the rogue is irrelevant.

  2. Sources of the English Legal System and the Relationship between Legislation and Judicial ...

    In the process of interpretation, it is when the term used was unclear, or it was left out by the draftsman thinking it would be applied automatically, or where the word is ambiguous, or even when the case before the court was not predicted as at the time when the legislation was enacted (Elliott and Quinn, 2011).

  1. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    illness, it might have been decided that only mental illness could be included in the M?Naghten rules. In Kemp, the defendant suffered from a physical illness known as arteriosclerosis, which caused the arteries to harden, causing congestion of blood on the brain.

  2. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    The higher the risk then the more precautions you need to take and the lower the risk then less precautions are needed, thus in Bolton v Stone it was held that erecting a fence was an adequate precaution given that the cricket ball had only been hit out of the ground 6 times in 25 years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work