• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

OCR Feb 10 Exam Paper Non-Fatal Offences Problem Case. The scenario states that Colin ran towards Sarah waving a knife. The actions by Colin caused Sarah to scream.

Extracts from this document...


OCR Feb 10 Exam Paper - Non-Fatal Offences Sarah is walking home when Colin runs towards her waving a knife. Sarah Screams. Colin grabs Sarah's coat and then punches her in the face which breaks her nose and causes her to fall to the ground. Gregory, a passer-by, runs to help Sarah. Colin lunges wildly at Gregory with the knife and slashes Gregory's hand, causing severe bleeding. Colin takes aim and kicks Sarah in the stomach, causing serious internal injuries. [35] The scenario states that Colin ran towards Sarah "waving a knife". The actions by Colin caused Sarah to scream. The Actus Reus for assault is 'any act which causes the 'victim' (V) to fear immediate unlawful force'. The meaning of immediate was defined in the Smith (1983), a case where a man looked into the window of a women in her flat thus causing her to be terrified, as to meaning "imminent". The fact that Sarah screamed after seeing Colin running towards her illustrates she feared of action imminently. ...read more.


The scenario indicates that Colin punched Sarah in the face, which resulted in her having a broken nose and falling to the ground. The Actus Reus for battery is present from the punch from Colin, which resulted in the broken nose. The Mens Rea is satisfied by Colin intentionally punching directly out at Sarah, which broke her nose. Colin is therefore guilty of the offence of battery. The broken nose suffered by Colin's punch on Sarah indicates that Colin could be guilty of a more serious punishment. The Actus Reus for s.47 'actual bodily harm' (ABH), as set out in 'Offences Against the Person Act' (OAPA) 1861, is 'assult or battery', coupled with 'ABH'. It has already been established that a battery was present. The case of Miller defined ABH as 'any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim'. Richard seems to have punched Sarah with a significant amount of force, of which he would of known would damage the health of the V.The Mens Rea for s.47 ABH is 'intention or recklessness to cause the assault or battery'. ...read more.


To lunge "wildy" indicates a reckless act. The knife had been in Colin's possession from the previous stages, there is nothing to show in the scenario that Colin purposly aimed the knife at Gregory to cause a wounding. Colin is therefore guilty of committing a wounding under s.20 OAPA, and can be sentenced up to 5 years imprisonment. Colin kicked Sarah in the stomach, causing severe internal injuries. The case of Smith defined GBH as 'really serious harm'. The case of Burstow simply stated that the meaning of inflict was equal to 'cause', and that no technical assault or battery was required. The Actus Reus includes 'inflicting GBH'. From the Burstow & Smith cases it can be seen that "serious internal injuries" were caused, and that these signicicant injuries amount to really serious harm. The Mens Rea for s.18 OAPA would be present over that of s.20 OAPA, as it is identifiable that Colin intend GBH, and not just some harm. Colin is said to take aim at the already injured Sarah and kicks her in the stomach, one of the most vulnerable parts of the human body. Colin is therefore guilty of committing a wounding under s.18 OAPA, and can be sentenced up to life imprisonment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A very good essay that identifies the relevant offences. The student applies case law well.

3.5 / 4 stars

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 05/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Rules of Causation Case. Jess throws paint in Sams eyes. Sam had to go ...

    5 star(s)

    An example of the victims own act is, R v Roberts, the victim jumped from a moving car because the defendant made sexual advances at her. Held the chain could only be broken if the victim did something so unexpected that no reasonable man could be expected to foresee it.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    English law does not normally impose liability for an omission or failure to act ...

    4 star(s)

    She had mental problems and was suffering from anorexia nervosa. Ted and Gwendolyn took her in and agreed to look after her. However, Fanny's condition deteriorated and she was found dead in her bed in appalling conditions. A case similar to this is R v Instan 1983, The D lived

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is the current law on the non-fatal offences against the person satisfactory?

    4 star(s)

    These are "assault", "intentional or reckless injury", "reckless serious injury" and "intentional serious injury". There are numerous recurring problems with the current legislation; these include definition, interpretation and adaptation. This is particularly true for the law on assault, which lacked clarity and so required a great deal of interpretation by the judiciary.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    So that is one of the hardest things to prove - what the defendant really intended when he committed the guilty act - they may not have even intended to cause GBH, but would still be on a charge of murder.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Reform of the law on murder.The law commission say it is rickety structure set ...

    3 star(s)

    This therefore isn't fair labelling. In regards to GBH, this is criticised for being unfair as said in Powell; "people are convicted of murder who are not in ordinary sense a murderer"...."GBH murder rule turns murder into a constructive crime" Lord Steyn.

  2. Human Trafficking In Australia. This essay will be covering different aspect of human ...

    An example of these breaches is the R v Tand (2008) 237 CLR 1; R v Wei Tang (2009) 233 FLR 399. This case is a prime example of what the consequences may be if caught breaching these acts. Wei Tang owned an illegal brothel and was accused of purchasing

  1. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    This was because the defendant?s ordinary mental faculties of reason, memory and understanding had been affected so his condition came within the rules on insanity. It could just have easily been decided in this case that the defect of reason had to be caused by a mental disease, as it was in M?Naghten.

  2. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    In R v Cheshire it was held that medical negligence only breaks the chain of causation if the act of the doctor rendered the D?s act insignificant. A case example is R v Jordan where the doctor gave a healing patient an antibiotic which they were allergic to and this was in the patient?s notes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work