• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conflict at work: Industrial Disputes

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Conflict at work: Industrial Disputes Industrial disputes are not a rare occurrence in today's society. Examples of this are highlighted in the media whenever we switch on our televisions or open our newspapers. I have strung together a report on why industrial disputes happen, including some of the recent and current industrial disputes. In February 2002, London Underground drivers devised a strike to see their pay rise by 5.7 percent. The strike was called off once union negotiators accepted a pay offer. Once in talks with officials representing Aslef, and the Rail Maritime and Transport Union, London Underground increased the offer. The General Secretary of RMT said after the agreement that he was pleased to have reached a settlement without having to resort to industrial action. This specific industrial dispute occurred, because tube drivers felt they were in need of a pay rise. The dispute was resolved thanks to the employers granting the drivers a pay rise. In this case, the tube drivers were the 'winners' of this industrial dispute, because they did not lose any pay by following through with the strike, and they arrived at their pay rise unscathed by the drawbacks of the proposed industrial action. In the same month as the London Underground tube drivers industrial dispute, David Blunkett, the Home Secretary retaliated after the majority of the Police Federation, representing 125, 000 officers surprisingly rejected a deal on pay and conditions. ...read more.

Middle

The dispute heated up as bosses claimed the 150 new security staff had already signed contracts, but the airport also claimed that the issues could be resolved through normal procedures, without need for industrial action. Transport and General Workers' Union regional spokesman, Dave McCall, however felt the demonstration was relevant to show the airport that it is not a matter to be taken lightly, despite what the company claims. After this report, came the inevitable second chapter to this dispute's saga. A little more than a month later, more strikes were planned by the security staff still disputing over the planned cutbacks by bosses. This certain string of strikes was proposed to take the form of five, hour long stoppages. Airport bosses, however seem unaffected by the strikes, remarking on the part of a spokesperson that passengers have not been affected by the strikes nor have they had an impact on the workings of the airport. Union leaders claim the cuts have sprung from airport bosses striving to increase profit margins and ignoring the security staff's issues generated by the cuts. Dave McCall, making another appearance this time stated that the airport can not rely on employing top quality security officers on the lowly pay they are being offered in the new deals. After the disastrous industrial dispute involving security staff at Manchester airport, you'd think there had been enough action there to last a lifetime. ...read more.

Conclusion

The back and forth overview of the dispute is immediately identified as tedious, a conclusion many of the workers will have adopted, this lowers job satisfaction and overall morale. All of the above industrial disputes, in some way or another, need to be resolved. Negotiation is the most effective method of arriving at an agreement, typically the union representative of that certain company will arrange a meeting with management to discuss the dispute, the exchange of views on the matter will commence, finally resulting with an agreement of some kind. However, this meeting is not always successful and sometimes leads to no change whatsoever. In this case the steps are repeated, in extreme cases where neither side have accepted a decision, industrial action takes place. Sometimes, however ACAS is introduced into the equation, made up of trade union reps, academics and business people, it encourages a settlement that all parties may agree to. Whatever the dispute, whatever the implications, industrial disputes mean hassle to both workers and employers. There always seems to be negative affects during and after the dispute, which is why they are discouraged by both employees and bosses alike, there is never a straight out winner, this is evident in the reviewed industrial disputes mentioned, in my opinion, industrial disputes and eventual action should only occur in extreme cases, in this day and age, irrelevant disputes are regularly displayed in the public eye, we have grown to accept industrial disputes as a formality in the workplace, which is a self inflicted affair. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Trade Unions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Trade Unions essays

  1. Explain fully and clearly the importance of negotiation within industrial relations to resolve disputes

    many teachers commute from their homes where cost of living is cheaper. This costs the teachers more money, as they have to pay to commute. Teachers that are made to live in these areas are demotivated as areas like this usually have high levels of crime.

  2. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    Another short term cause of equal importance were the further wage cuts in 1925, mine owners announced hours would be increasing yet wages would be falling. Mine owners had always shared a difference in opinion with the workers on how their wages should be worked out- mine workers wanted them

  1. Discuss the view that industrial relations represents a redundant and anachronistic form of management ...

    Firstly, it is hard to separate out 'cause and effect' when looking at the post-1979 IR legislature. Due to the incremental method by which the legislation was brought in, it can be implied that the weakening of unions actually caused the legislation, not the reverse.

  2. Social impact of ICT.

    all these changes mean, effectively, is a new implied contract between a company and a worker. The old employer/employee relationship, which offered security and reward to the individual in exchange for corporate loyalty is to go. Instead, individuals are told to take responsibility for their own working life and career,

  1. Explain fully and clearly the importance of negotiation within industrial relations to resolve disputes

    If negotiations are not made then it costs the taxpayers money as they are paying for a service that is not being provided when people are on strike. I believe the main reason why negotiations are important is that businesses reputations and profession develop a bad reputation, which has a knock on effect on recruitment.

  2. The Winnipeg General Strike.

    between employers and the local government.12 The meeting went on to examine the ways in which solidarity could be shown for the building and metal trades workers and it was unanimously agreed, in light of recent 4 progress in organizing non-union workers throughout the city, that a general strike would be the most effective tool for advancing the worker's cause.

  1. What is the influence of women social workers in the United States labor movement?

    Female organizers in particular found it useful to emphasize issues of more concern to women--work conflicts and workplace discrimination, for example. 5. More women arganizers have been hired in recent years. This is difficult to do, since organizers are poorly paid, have the toughest jobs, and have a high burn-out rate.

  2. It is our intention to examine the interplay between industrial relations (IR) and human ...

    Work place conflict is seen as a temporary hurdle. Trade unions are seen as competition (Stone, 1998 p. 530) * Pluralist Approach The pluralist approach sees organisations as competitors, where the management needs to mediate between different groups of interest. Trade unions are representatives of the employees, and the state of industrial relations depends on the compromises made between management and the unions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work