• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do pressure groups strengthen or weaken democracy?

Extracts from this document...


Do pressure groups strengthen or weaken democracy? From animal rights to women's right, not t5o mention trade unions there are hundreds of pressure groups operating in today's society. They work in different way to influence government policy and are subject to few controls so do they undermine or support democratic government? Freedom of association in a fundamental principle of a liberal democracy, therefore, it could be deemed that pressure groups must be supporting democratic government as they are upholding people's rights. It can be argued that, as elections are a legitimate process allowing society's participation pressure groups are unnecessary, however opportunities for involvement are no more than every five years so pressure groups provide a vital opportunity for participation and access to thaw political system between elections thereby enhancing the quality of democracy. ...read more.


There is also 'unequal competition' between business and labour groups the former enjoying control of economic resources, a public status and level of access to government that the latter cannot match. The idea that influences commensurate with the size of the group is seriously flawed as small, tightly knit associations, for example the BMA often have a degree of influence entirely out of proportion to their democratic weight. The insider-outsider distinction demonstrates that there is no true equality of access. Some groups enjoy privileged respectable relations with government and are often consulted on policy whilst others have top rely on media and public opinion to get government to listen to their views. Neo-pluralism highlights the privileged position that business groups enjoy in the western world, whilst acknowledging that this seriously compromises the claim that such societies are democratic. ...read more.


All of whom have been elected as legitimate representatives of the people of Britain. The strength of single-issue pressure groups raises a number of questions about democracy. Too much focus on one issue pushes others from the agenda, which can lead to debate that dominates politics, focusing attention on one issues to the detriment of others which could be as important. Democracy is not about responding to the demands of any one groups but arriving at a balanced judgement, which takes account of all perspectives to make a decision that is best for society as a whole. Whilst I acknowledge the valuable expertise of they have to offer and the representation they provide I feel that due to the unavoidable inequality of access and influence, the fact that they are anti-parlimentary democracy and are totally unaccountable to the public that they serve only to inhibit the process of democratic government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. In what ways do pressure groups strengthen democracy?

    Through this they might inherit some of the ideas. They may do this by making sure people know what's going on. By getting them more involved, getting them to take an interest in politics. A more knowledgeable public will probably lead to people realising what they believe strongly in.

  2. Access the view that pressure groups strengthen democracy.

    is an unfair form of democracy, as it favours wealthier pressure groups, as it costs money to lobby firms and politicians. Another elitist viewpoint of this is by doing such activities can lead to sleaze and corruption inside the government, as there are possible "behind the scene" agreements and transactions

  1. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    group activity, with judges making important decisions regarding policy in a growing number of issue areas. Lobbying occurs on a much larger scale in the USA, and is the main strategy adopted by interest groups. After the Second World War, a larger more active government emerged and the levels of lobbying increased dramatically.

  2. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    The presence of the media is one which cannot be swapped for wealth in this case. The presence of wealth would probably not increase the success of Fathers4Justice, as the matter is unlikely to be high on the government's agenda regardless of the wealth of the outsider group.

  1. 'The existence of pressure groups makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    Therefore directing efforts to the EU could be seen as a double-edged sword. Ultimately the government may not have the power to help them regardless of if it wanted to.

  2. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    Pressure groups therefore act like a safety valve preventing revolutions and civil wars. When in 2003 Tony Blair announced his decision to invade Iraq a huge organisation "Stop the War Coalition" emerged. Over a million people went to the demonstration against the visit of George Bush to London expressing their disagreement with the government.

  1. Do you consider the political activities of organised groups (pressure groups) to enhance or ...

    This shows that the direct action by the outsider groups bypasses the conventional government decision making process and therefore threatens democracy. If we were to consider the pluralist model then it could be argued that democracy is in fact enhanced by the role of pressure groups.

  2. What, in de Tocqueville's view, are the virtues and what are the vices of ...

    There are also institutional dangers present in democracy. With a disproportionately high amount of power in most legislative branches (because they are most directly representative of the opinion of the people), democracies can become tyrannical if there are not sufficient checks on this power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work