• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways does the new European Union legal order differ from the common law jurisdiction? To what extent do you think the machinery of the new legal order is effective in achieving its objectives?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

* In what ways does the new European Union legal order differ from the common law jurisdiction? To what extent do you think the machinery of the new legal order is effective in achieving its objectives? The main sources of law in the common law jurisdiction are statutes and the doctrine of judicial precedent. In the European Union (EU) the main sources of law are the treaties and various forms of secondary legislation (regulations, directives, and decisions), judicial precedent does not apply in the EU. As of 1st January 1973 EU law has had effect in the UK as a result of the European Communities Act 1972. The EU does not have a formal constitution as such, but the EC Treaty confers powers and duties on the institutions. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has referred to 'a new legal order' in a number of cases. This 'new legal order' is characterised by the concepts of direct effect and the supremacy of EU law over national law. The case of Van Gend en Loos (1963)1 establishes the 'new legal order' most clearly, where the court created a famous statement2. The case of Van Gend en Loos (1963)3 was the first in a long line of rulings from the ECJ that developed the doctrine of supremacy of EU law over national law. The case of Costa v. ...read more.

Middle

Certain paragraphs in pieces of secondary legislation must not be considered in seclusion, but within context of the whole instrument. There is said to be a lack of precision in some EU provisions and references to the 'framework of community law' as in Costa v. ENEL (1964) 21 are not uncommon. This is in obvious contrast to the common law system where courts look to the meaning of the words before them, in their immediate context. The main teleological approach requires the judge to look to the purpose or object of the text before him. This approach gives the judges the most leniency in their interpretation, as they can even look to the aims of the treaties and the community as a whole. The main purposes of teleological interpretation are as follows; * To promote the objective for which the provision was made. * To prevent unacceptable consequences flowing from a literal interpretation of the wording. * To fill gaps in the legal order. The statement22 of the court in CILFIT (1982)23 illustrates clearly how the courts look to EU law as a whole. A statement24 from Bosch v. De Geus (1962)25 is also noteworthy. Using teleological interpretation the Court's often make decisions, ignoring express words of EU legislation. This is done to; * Strengthen the EU's structure. * Increase scope and effectiveness of EU law. ...read more.

Conclusion

Article two has regard to economic activities and harmonious development, obviously the mechanism of direct effect is plays a role in ensuring this. As I have shown the ECJ are willing to expand the law here to ensure development of the law is harmonious in all Member States. Article ten is the solidarity principle, this contains a positive burden to support EU law, and a negative burden to not adopt law opposed to the development of EU law. The principle of state liability as first mentioned in Francovich, Bonifaci and others v. Italy (1991)39 acts as an incentive to states to implement and comply with EU law. Articles twelve and thirteen have regard to discrimination in a number of forms. Article 12 has direct effect, whilst Article 13 does not. A successful claim under Article requires a unanimous decision from the Council of Ministers, it is clear to see the potential of this Article is limited. Due to the mechanisms of direct effect and direct applicability and some creative interpretation by the ECJ, both in preliminary rulings and case judgements all the basic principles relating to; * Free movement of goods and persons. * Sex and nationality discrimination. * Competition policy. May now be invoked by individuals before their national courts. The legal order is still developing and thus so is the body of legislation surrounding it. So far there have not been any horrendous mistakes or problems on the road to achieving the objectives of the legal order. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent has the European Union been successful in "establishing" a coherent European ...

    Therefore, lots of principles have already been put forward, such as increasing in food-safety standards, the European Health Insurance Card, regulation of mobile phone changes, environment reports, the right to vote in local and European, elections in another Member State, etc.

  2. How relevant has the concept of the 'rule of reason,' developed in United States ...

    The fact the agreements object is to restrict competition means it goes against the inherent nature of the EC treaty, therefore meaning that the ECJ adopted a very narrow scope when deciding whether the agreements are in breach of Article 81 (1).

  1. With reference to specific cases, outline the effectiveness of Article 82 in preventing the ...

    The Commission believed there to be a breach or Article 82 due to the fact that the companies were almost showing themselves to the general public as one company because of the identical prices and conditions of sale. The case was annulled and taken to the Court of First Instance

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    London is densely packed whilst the countryside areas are lightly populated. The citizens of the United Kingdom find that their costs of living are much higher then the rest of the EU countries, many essential items such as food, public transport and petrol are higher priced then most if not then all the EU countries.

  1. How Member States can derogate from the trading conditions governed by European Community (EC) ...

    that, "cultural aims may justify certain restrictions on the free movement of goods provided that those restrictions apply to national and imported products without distinction".49 In the Familiapress case the ECJ stated that, "press diversity may constitute an overriding requirement justifying a restriction on free movement of goods".

  2. "How was the doctrine of supremacy developed by the European Court of Justice, and ...

    In 1957, when the Treaty of Rome was first shaped, the forefathers of a Federal Europe knew exactly what they intended for member states. During Macmillan's reign as Prime Minister (1957 - 1963), he and his Conservative Government accepted the certainty of the EEC and sought to place Britain at

  1. The European Community and ECJ

    In that case the applicant was charged an import duty by Customs and Excise that had been increased to 8% in contravention of Article 12 of the EC Treaty, which specified just a 3%. The first preliminary reference of the Dutch court was sent to the ECJ asking whether Art.

  2. What were the key provisions of the Treaty on European Union (Maastricht)? Discuss how ...

    The Amsterdam treaty of 1997 came into force in 1999, which revised the provisions of the Maastricht Treaty, and the 'old' third pillar - co-operation in Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - was reduced in size and changed in scope as certain matters were transferred into the 'first pillar'.9 The

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work