• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways does the new European Union legal order differ from the common law jurisdiction? To what extent do you think the machinery of the new legal order is effective in achieving its objectives?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

* In what ways does the new European Union legal order differ from the common law jurisdiction? To what extent do you think the machinery of the new legal order is effective in achieving its objectives? The main sources of law in the common law jurisdiction are statutes and the doctrine of judicial precedent. In the European Union (EU) the main sources of law are the treaties and various forms of secondary legislation (regulations, directives, and decisions), judicial precedent does not apply in the EU. As of 1st January 1973 EU law has had effect in the UK as a result of the European Communities Act 1972. The EU does not have a formal constitution as such, but the EC Treaty confers powers and duties on the institutions. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has referred to 'a new legal order' in a number of cases. This 'new legal order' is characterised by the concepts of direct effect and the supremacy of EU law over national law. The case of Van Gend en Loos (1963)1 establishes the 'new legal order' most clearly, where the court created a famous statement2. The case of Van Gend en Loos (1963)3 was the first in a long line of rulings from the ECJ that developed the doctrine of supremacy of EU law over national law. The case of Costa v. ...read more.

Middle

Certain paragraphs in pieces of secondary legislation must not be considered in seclusion, but within context of the whole instrument. There is said to be a lack of precision in some EU provisions and references to the 'framework of community law' as in Costa v. ENEL (1964) 21 are not uncommon. This is in obvious contrast to the common law system where courts look to the meaning of the words before them, in their immediate context. The main teleological approach requires the judge to look to the purpose or object of the text before him. This approach gives the judges the most leniency in their interpretation, as they can even look to the aims of the treaties and the community as a whole. The main purposes of teleological interpretation are as follows; * To promote the objective for which the provision was made. * To prevent unacceptable consequences flowing from a literal interpretation of the wording. * To fill gaps in the legal order. The statement22 of the court in CILFIT (1982)23 illustrates clearly how the courts look to EU law as a whole. A statement24 from Bosch v. De Geus (1962)25 is also noteworthy. Using teleological interpretation the Court's often make decisions, ignoring express words of EU legislation. This is done to; * Strengthen the EU's structure. * Increase scope and effectiveness of EU law. ...read more.

Conclusion

Article two has regard to economic activities and harmonious development, obviously the mechanism of direct effect is plays a role in ensuring this. As I have shown the ECJ are willing to expand the law here to ensure development of the law is harmonious in all Member States. Article ten is the solidarity principle, this contains a positive burden to support EU law, and a negative burden to not adopt law opposed to the development of EU law. The principle of state liability as first mentioned in Francovich, Bonifaci and others v. Italy (1991)39 acts as an incentive to states to implement and comply with EU law. Articles twelve and thirteen have regard to discrimination in a number of forms. Article 12 has direct effect, whilst Article 13 does not. A successful claim under Article requires a unanimous decision from the Council of Ministers, it is clear to see the potential of this Article is limited. Due to the mechanisms of direct effect and direct applicability and some creative interpretation by the ECJ, both in preliminary rulings and case judgements all the basic principles relating to; * Free movement of goods and persons. * Sex and nationality discrimination. * Competition policy. May now be invoked by individuals before their national courts. The legal order is still developing and thus so is the body of legislation surrounding it. So far there have not been any horrendous mistakes or problems on the road to achieving the objectives of the legal order. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent has the European Union been successful in "establishing" a coherent European ...

    In this aspect, to make everywhere "the same" does not only mean no borders, every member state should be brought into line on the social welfare. Education is another significant impact on European identity. Nowadays the high level of education in any member state is available to any European resident.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    Some of the worlds most beautiful architecture is in Greece with Folk art and Classic Greek sculpture. The tourist industry is also of a high standard as around 30 million visitors very year. Multiactive culture Language, should be thought from the point of view of both the written and spoken language.

  1. Success of New Imperialism

    otherwise might have prevented the often rapid European conquest and colonization of African states. Of course, another factor not to be neglected in explaining the successful European imperial expansion in Africa is the role of European diplomacy or specifically, the West African Conference.

  2. Why has the Common Agricultural Policy proved so controversial?

    In the event, the reforms could not take place due to resistance from some member states. However, the fact that reforms were introduced at all suggests that all was not well. The MacSharry reforms of 1992 were much more successful.

  1. Supremacy of the European Union has, to all intents and purposes, crippled the domestic ...

    political, monetary and economic union, or the birth of a state called EUROPE. EU law, including regulations made by un-elected bureaucrats of the EU Commission, now take precedence to the twin legal systems of Britain, the tried and tested institutions of both Common and Statute law, undermining our own Parliament, Courts and Customs.

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    The principal hallmark of citizenship is not the enjoyment of human rights-- though that may be part of the citizenship package. We pride ourselves that we extend human rights to visitors, aliens and the like. The deepest, most clearly engraved hallmark of citizenship in our democracies is that in citizens

  1. The European Community and ECJ

    In that case the applicant was charged an import duty by Customs and Excise that had been increased to 8% in contravention of Article 12 of the EC Treaty, which specified just a 3%. The first preliminary reference of the Dutch court was sent to the ECJ asking whether Art.

  2. How relevant has the concept of the 'rule of reason,' developed in United States ...

    The fact the agreements object is to restrict competition means it goes against the inherent nature of the EC treaty, therefore meaning that the ECJ adopted a very narrow scope when deciding whether the agreements are in breach of Article 81 (1).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work