• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Introduction to EU enlargement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction to EU enlargement After growing from 6 to 15 members, the next wave of EU enlargement is around the corner. The EU has agreed to admit 10 new members from the central Europe and Mediterranean who meet the political criteria - stable democracy, respect for human rights, protection to minority, and the rules of law. As full market economies, they will implement all the EU's common rules and policies. After ratification of their accession treaty they will join in the EU in 2004. Meanwhile three other candidates still endeavour to pursue their membership of EU. In the map, we can see all the countries that can be in the enlargement of European Union. The 10 candidates are Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Malta, and Cyprus. Romania and Bulgaria are in the stage of negotiation. Turkey has already been accepted as an candidate, and its membership negotiation will begin once it fulfills the political condition. A larger Europe will have greater power and weight in the worldwide affairs. The enlargement will have a great effect on the member states, and the people's life in new member country will be changed dramatically as well. The EU leaders always describe the enlargement as a landmark, and strategic unification will spread the peace and prosperity throughout the Europe. Is the sounded and rosy image going to happen? What the existing member states can benefit from a larger Europe, and how much should they pay to improve the new member's fragile and weak economy. ...read more.

Middle

3. Reforming the functioning of the Council is a key issue relevant to the institutional reform. Table1: The distribution of profit derived from the EU eastward enlargement by the current EU members. Share of total EU-1 real income gain,% Germany 33.8 France 19.3 United Kingdom 14.1 Italy 8.5 Spain 7 Netherlands 4.6 Sweden 3.9 Belgium/Luxembourg 2.6 Austria 2.6 Denmark 1.9 Finland 1.4 Ireland 0.3 Greece 0.3 Portugal 0.4 Source: Breuss, 2001 Table 1 shows distribution of trading profits received by western companies from trade with countries of central and eastern Europe. Germany is clearly the most important beneficiary of economic integration. Its trade with Central and Eastern Europe comes to 9% of its total external trade and around 34% of total EU trade with this region (although its economy only accounts for around 25% of the EU economy in terms of GDP). "Already, Eastern European markets are more important for Germany than the US and other markets" (Hoyer, 2001) The "core" countries for trade with Eastern Europe, i.e. Germany, France, United Kingdom and Italy have the best chances for economic growth and can carry out significant structural changes in the East. This creates additional demand for goods from other EU countries, particularly from less developed Mediterranean region and countries of the Mediterranean, Central and Eastern Europe will deepen their trade relations. Cost: The challenge of the enlargement for the current states is mainly from the cost of helping the countries with lower level of economy to meet the condition, reducing the disparities between the current member states and the candidate countries, harmonizing their policies and practice in economics, politics, agriculture and industry. ...read more.

Conclusion

An economist at Slovak Foreign Policy Association said "there is this myth that we will suddenly claim our rightful place as rich country in the heart of Europe, but that will take years and the expectations are bound to be disappointed". (Ardy, 2001) Things will get worse before they get better. Conclusion: The EU's enlargement should be a win-win situation both to the current members and candidate members. The biggest economic prize offered by EU enlargement is a single market with 500 million people, and all the participants have to respect the same regulatory principles. The development will boost the business confidence. The ultimate beneficiaries will be the citizen of Europe, as an individual liveing in a democratic society or as a consumer enjoying the benefit of integrated market and as a worker or business people working to develop European economy. It is undoubtedly that the enlargement will bring in huge amount of cost. Some people would express their fears on the cost, but cost is inevitable in the globalisation and it will benefit EU in the long run. It is far better to manage the cost in the common interest-Enlargement offers the best opportunity to do it appropriately in the European context. Reference * Breska, E et al (2002) Costs, benefits and chances of eastern enlargement for the European Union * Hoyer, W.(2001) Perspectives of European Integration after the European Council in Luxe,mbourg * Gros, D. (2002) Who wants to pay for enlargement? http://www.ceps.be/Commentary/April02/pb-22.php * Baldwin, R. Francois, J and Portes, R. (2002)The costs and benefits of EU enlargement * Official Site of EU http://europa.eu. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    Exchange controls, Governments can reduce the amounts of imports coming into their country by placing restrictions on the amount of currency that individuals and businesses can buy. The ability to buy foreign currency is essential to international trade as sellers insist on being paid in their own currency.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    Boots will opening stores in the following EU member states, France Germany Finland Turkey (Turkey not member of the EU at present). Boots operating in the UK had potentially 60 million consumers to sell to, by operating in the single market it has now increased to 360 million consumers being larger market/ wider market.

  1. Which EU institution is the most powerful

    As the driving force behind policy initiative is the Commission, such an act would deprive the European Union, in many senses, of its modus operandi. Nevertheless, it was pressure from the Parliament that led to the resignation of the Santer commissioners in 1999.

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    What, then, should or could be done? Despite its centrality to the notion of democracy and political legitimacy, there is something inherently troubling in the introduction of citizenship to the Union lexicon. We have already seen that in substance Article 8 was an empty gesture.

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    TIPANET can only be used for low-value payments. In TIPANET, each bank is free to decide with which bank to do business in another country. Transfers are settled through reciprocal accounts that banks hold for each other. This means that a greater number of partners increases complexity for a bank.

  2. "To what extent will the proposed EU constitution affect, the procedure for EU/EC negotiation ...

    Article 252 (ex Art 189c) amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam to confer more power to the European Parliament during the procedure for an agreement. In the beginning, when Art 252 was introduced by the Single European Act, it was used for measures to implement the single market.

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    This was a typical rapprochement policy for both sides so that they will keep their interests in the highest possible point in former Yugoslavia. There were also European opponents of Berlin agreement, with the leadership of France. In addition to a desire for autonomous action capability, France was promoting a

  2. International Economics

    That would be a big security issue that would be avoided if we were to keep the pound and not take on the Euro. Therefore it is damaging to our economy and only through a stable economy will the euro have the chance of becoming a stable currency.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work