• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is humanitarian intervention justifiable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Manar Habib 13DL Is humanitarian intervention justifiable? The view that humanitarian intervention is justifiable is debatable. This is due to the fact that in many cases there are two sides to a judgement, the side of the country or countries intervening and the side of the country that is being subjected to intervention. An example is the Iraq war in which the USA and Great Britain intervened, the US and UK may have viewed intervention as inevitable and necessary while the Iraqi?s had many other views and in hindsight many see intervention as a way of worsening matters. Furthermore the idea that humanitarian intervention is justifiable could indeed always depend on the situation and to what extent is intervention needed. Intervention can be justified by the idea of ?common humanity?, this is the idea that moral responsibilities cannot be limited to a country?s own people and country but essentially to the whole of humanity. This can also be called indivisible humanity due to the claim that we are all humans no matter where we are on the planet. For example the Syrians may be different in geography and language to citizens of the western countries however; this doesn?t mean that they should be subjected to mass murder. ...read more.

Middle

Also the idea of global interdependence is important because it sheds light to the other side of self-interest; enlightened self-interest. An example of this is ?Operation Provide Comfort? (1991) which is when the US intervened in Iraq to defend Kurds that were fleeing their homes in the aftermath of the Iran-Iraq war. On the other hand, the issue of double standards arises that argues against the justification of humanitarian intervention. This is when there is clearly a pressing humanitarian emergency but certain countries decide not to intervene and go to the extent of ruling intervention out completely. For example, the Rwandan genocide in 1994, the USA had just come out of a terrible peacekeeping mission in Somalia and vowed never to get involved in a conflict between clans and tribes where there was no national interest. This shows that although the Rwandan genocide was such a pressing situation as there was no national interest in getting involved the US avoided it showing that they had double standards as years later they involved themselves in Iraq where there was a possibility of personal gain and national interest in the form of oil. ...read more.

Conclusion

This then results in a distorted view of humanitarian intervention which leads to devastation once it happens as things are underestimated or overestimated. Distortion has a key role in the argument against humanitarian intervention being justifiable. This is because of the fact that the west have a false view of human rights in other parts of the world, for example the USA may have a different set of human rights to those of a middle eastern country and this distorted view can have many disastrous consequences as humanitarian intervention may occur due to a misinterpretation of the human rights of the countries involved. This shows that humanitarian intervention isn?t justifiable because of the different political systems around the world. In conclusion, the evidence shows that whether humanitarian intervention is justifiable depends mostly on the situation. There are views that support intervention as it is viewed as an act for the greater good and must happen to prevent mass murder occurring, while others view it negatively as a seed of double standards and national interest as shown in Rwanda in 1994 where the US didn?t intervene due to no personal gain being offered in return. As a result humanitarian intervention is justifiable according to the situation. Is humanitarian intervention justifiable? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Razzledazzle[1]: The Mexican President

    Colosio's politics were highly differing from the economic reforms Salinas had so zealously implemented for the past six years; Colosio considered social change primordial in order to obtain economic change. Nevertheless, it is too early in the historical process for definite theories to acquire academic confirmation.

  2. Nigeria Country Study

    Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, when regarding the relationship between citizens and state, the interests of the rulers and the dominant economic class are paramount. Therefore, enforcement of the laws and maintenance of social order, which promote the interests of the rulers to the detriment of the majority of the

  1. Iran Country Study

    * Persians: 51 * Azeri: 24 * Gilaki and Mazandarani: 8 * Kurd: 7 * Arab: 3 * Lur: 2 * Baloch: 2 * Turkmen: 2 * Other: 1 * Religious affiliation (%) * Shi'a Muslim: 89 * Sunni Muslim: 10 * Zoroastrians, Jewish, Christians, and Baha'i: 1 Section III:

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    The need to balance competing forces and to find acceptable compromises implies that only in extreme emergencies can pluralist systems adopt radical measures. Pluralism and the forceful, timely management of issues do not sit easily side by side. Hence, it seems valid to presume that such systems will not work

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    Classical approaches to sovereignty and power (a) Machiavelli I believe that it is pertinent to begin this section with a brief look at the work of Nicolo Machiavelli. Possibly his most recognised work The Prince was completed in 1513 and is still one of the most influential pieces of political literature.

  2. Why has the concept of humanitarian intervention provoked so much debate in political commentary?

    In May 2009, however the US sought and was elected to a three-year term on the HRC. ?While we recognize that the Human Rights Council has been a flawed body that has lived up to its potential?, explained US ambassador to the UN Susan Rice, ? we believe that working

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work