• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Public Law Coursework

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Public Law Coursework Prime facie, this case would seem to be a simple matter regarding the Weights and Measures Act 19851. However, the defence brings into their argument, important issues concerning legislative supremacy. There is a distinct element of constitutional significance to this case and this is evident from the fact that Lord Justice Law's judgement devotes a substantial amount of direction on the issue of implied repeal and the entrenchment of community law. It is important to look at the facts of this case and they are fairly simple. The defendant Mr. Thoburn was a greengrocer in Sunderland. As part of his business he used weighing equipment to weigh the product he was providing to his customer. This weighing equipment gave indication in imperial demarcations, which was contrary to current legislation and the defendant was given an official warning along with some 28 days to rectify the violation. The defendant ignored the warning and continued to use the weighing machines with imperial demarcations. He was charged with 2 offences and pleaded not guilty on the grounds that his actions were not contrary to current legislation. Firstly, let us examine some of the main points in Laws L.J's judgement. His lordship highlights the fact that the centrepiece of the defence's argument was the Doctrine of Implied Repeal2. ...read more.

Middle

Lord Bridge of Harwich speaking in R v Secretary of State for Transport, Ex parte Factortame Ltd11 makes an important point: "If the supremacy within the European Community of Community law over the national law of member states was not always inherent in the E.E.C. Treaty it was certainly well established in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice long before the United Kingdom joined the Community. Thus, whatever limitation of its sovereignty Parliament accepted when it enacted the European Communities Act 1972 was entirely voluntary" This is a point which Laws L.J. agrees with in his judgement and he finds that upon joining the EU we sacrificed some of our sovereignty in order to give power and effect to the EU. Laws L.J. adds further to his statements on the relationship between the UK and the EU in the final part of the judgement. He argues that when considering the United Kingdom' relationship with the EU there are four crucial propositions that are required. Firstly, his Lordship states that all the specific rights and obligations which EU law created are incorporated into our own national law and given supremacy over all domestic law until such time as the 1972 act is expressly repealed. This means that any law passed after the 1972 act came into force must be in accordance with or subordinate to EU Law. ...read more.

Conclusion

It forms a basis for all future cases relating to the relationship between the two legislative powers. The impact will primarily be felt in those cases which concern a) conflicts between EU law and domestic statute, b) the implied repeal of acts with constitutional effect and c) the implication of the UK's dualist14 approach to EU law. It will also have some impact on cases which involve the issue of entrenched EU law as it was found convincingly in this judgement that certain EU legislation can become entrenched. In conclusion, this case has an important impact on the issue of supremacy. The conclusion of Laws L.J.'s judgement is that Parliament remains sovereign as its sovereignty is a fundamental part of our constitution and no parliament can alienate its own sovereignty. Thus it is only possible for European Law to have a contingent supremacy based upon the power given to it by parliament, a power which can always be stripped away by the passing of an Act. He adds that cases like Factortame15 show that there is an impasse between the two legislative bodies and Laws L.J. states that in order to overcome this, what has in effect been created by the courts are two separate supremacies. Therefore we can see the importance of what this judgement means, no foreign power has the right to take away the supremacy of parliament, such is our constitution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    *be ready to handle the consequences of UK entry *Boots customers as of the policy may be confused with the change over of the currency, pricing may thought to be suspicious as quoted in euro's and customers may be concerned that retailers are concealing prices.

  2. "How was the doctrine of supremacy developed by the European Court of Justice, and ...

    However this was completely opposite when it came to the United Kingdom accepting the supremacy of EU law. This was seen to be a problem because the doctrine conflicts centrally with the concept of having British constitution of 'parliamentary sovereignty.' The acts of parliament override all existing law or legislation.

  1. An Analysis of the Powers of the European Parliament.

    Having established that the EP does have genuine legislative influence I will now out line the weaknesses to which it is subject. Unlike national Parliaments the EP does not have legislative powers, it does not have the final say over what is and what is not to become law.

  2. This essay is intended to have an in-depth appraisal of the implication of the ...

    However, it may be noticed that this right does not only apply to the union citizens but was stretched to include non- citizens resident in the union. This goes to show the level of commitment put forward at making the union bodies more transparent and efficient in the discharging its duties.

  1. Charity law.

    The Commission is also allowed to decline to follow a previous decision in the same way as the courts, allowing more flexibility because it can depart from precedent when it think this is necessary. Although the Commission has no power to make new law, providing a restraint on development and its decision making process.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    The cosmetics market of the 15 member states of the European Union calculated at retail prices at the point of sale increased in 2000 by 4.5% to 49.4 billion euro's. Portugal showed the highest market growth (+11.2%), closely followed by Ireland (11%).

  1. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    the other party, and now it is far too late to expect the UN to prevent the EU from interfering into the dispute, which is normally under the jurisdiction of the UN. The EU - Turkey - Cyprus Triangle The European Union has the opportunity to play a constructive role in the resolution of the Cyprus conflict.

  2. Cultural Factors Relating to Fraternities

    (Cooper A14) Events like these happen more often then people know about. These events take place during the fall pledge season. Not all hazing instances result in death, but they all will result in anything from humiliation to something as personal as sterilization.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work