• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Public Law Coursework

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Public Law Coursework Prime facie, this case would seem to be a simple matter regarding the Weights and Measures Act 19851. However, the defence brings into their argument, important issues concerning legislative supremacy. There is a distinct element of constitutional significance to this case and this is evident from the fact that Lord Justice Law's judgement devotes a substantial amount of direction on the issue of implied repeal and the entrenchment of community law. It is important to look at the facts of this case and they are fairly simple. The defendant Mr. Thoburn was a greengrocer in Sunderland. As part of his business he used weighing equipment to weigh the product he was providing to his customer. This weighing equipment gave indication in imperial demarcations, which was contrary to current legislation and the defendant was given an official warning along with some 28 days to rectify the violation. The defendant ignored the warning and continued to use the weighing machines with imperial demarcations. He was charged with 2 offences and pleaded not guilty on the grounds that his actions were not contrary to current legislation. Firstly, let us examine some of the main points in Laws L.J's judgement. His lordship highlights the fact that the centrepiece of the defence's argument was the Doctrine of Implied Repeal2. ...read more.

Middle

Lord Bridge of Harwich speaking in R v Secretary of State for Transport, Ex parte Factortame Ltd11 makes an important point: "If the supremacy within the European Community of Community law over the national law of member states was not always inherent in the E.E.C. Treaty it was certainly well established in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice long before the United Kingdom joined the Community. Thus, whatever limitation of its sovereignty Parliament accepted when it enacted the European Communities Act 1972 was entirely voluntary" This is a point which Laws L.J. agrees with in his judgement and he finds that upon joining the EU we sacrificed some of our sovereignty in order to give power and effect to the EU. Laws L.J. adds further to his statements on the relationship between the UK and the EU in the final part of the judgement. He argues that when considering the United Kingdom' relationship with the EU there are four crucial propositions that are required. Firstly, his Lordship states that all the specific rights and obligations which EU law created are incorporated into our own national law and given supremacy over all domestic law until such time as the 1972 act is expressly repealed. This means that any law passed after the 1972 act came into force must be in accordance with or subordinate to EU Law. ...read more.

Conclusion

It forms a basis for all future cases relating to the relationship between the two legislative powers. The impact will primarily be felt in those cases which concern a) conflicts between EU law and domestic statute, b) the implied repeal of acts with constitutional effect and c) the implication of the UK's dualist14 approach to EU law. It will also have some impact on cases which involve the issue of entrenched EU law as it was found convincingly in this judgement that certain EU legislation can become entrenched. In conclusion, this case has an important impact on the issue of supremacy. The conclusion of Laws L.J.'s judgement is that Parliament remains sovereign as its sovereignty is a fundamental part of our constitution and no parliament can alienate its own sovereignty. Thus it is only possible for European Law to have a contingent supremacy based upon the power given to it by parliament, a power which can always be stripped away by the passing of an Act. He adds that cases like Factortame15 show that there is an impasse between the two legislative bodies and Laws L.J. states that in order to overcome this, what has in effect been created by the courts are two separate supremacies. Therefore we can see the importance of what this judgement means, no foreign power has the right to take away the supremacy of parliament, such is our constitution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    *be ready to handle the consequences of UK entry *Boots customers as of the policy may be confused with the change over of the currency, pricing may thought to be suspicious as quoted in euro's and customers may be concerned that retailers are concealing prices.

  2. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    Reunification talks started in 2002, but the June deadline passed without result. In March 11, 2003 UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan announced the end of efforts to reunite island and withdrawal of peace envoy. The Republic of Cyprus signed accession treaty with the EU in April 16, 2003 and the following

  1. Cultural Factors Relating to Fraternities

    People never really hear about the universities themselves fighting the problem. When a problem takes place as much as hazing, one would think that the university would step in and take action. Instead, it seems that the universities are standing by the fraternities by keeping this quiet.

  2. Back ground information about the EU

    The European Union today Today the European Union consists of 15 countries, namely Germany, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Finland, France, Greece, Italy, Republic of Ireland, Luxembourg, Holland, Portugal, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Demark. These nations are socially democratic and have demonstrated in a free and voluntary manner their willingness to join

  1. This essay is intended to have an in-depth appraisal of the implication of the ...

    Thereby bring about the transfer of legislative procedure and limitation of their (sovereignty) of these states in matters related to such field4. The success recorded under this arrangement led to the negotiation to establish more institution to administer key sectors of their economy.

  2. Charity law.

    the relief of poverty, 2) the advancement of education, 3) the advancement of religion; and 4) other purposes beneficial to the community. The fact that there is no statutory definition, the Charities Act 1960 simply says that charity should be given its current legal meaning, and that the Commission has

  1. "How was the doctrine of supremacy developed by the European Court of Justice, and ...

    - The organs and constituent bodies of the member states, including the legislative, executive and judiciary, are fully responsible for reversing the effects of violations of EU law, which affect individuals. This may, for example, involve the courts ordering the government to pay damages for loss caused by breach of

  2. An assessement of the impact of the lawyers' establishment directive.

    Moreover, the Treaty lays down the principle that the self-employed may freely exercise an activity in two ways: the person or firm may set up in another Member State pursuant to Article 43 (ex 52) EC - this being known as the "freedom of establishment"--or offer their services across frontiers

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work