• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

State a case for and against replacing the current voting system used to elect members of House of Commons.

Extracts from this document...


One argument against First Past The Post (the current electoral system used in the general elections) is that a different voting systems would be fairer to minor political parties that in the past have been under represented in parliament this is because FPTP is a simple plurality system which means there is no need for a majority, parties only need to win by one more vote then the opposing parties in 326 to have a majority of seats in parliament. Under FPTP votes are also not proportional to the seats thus favouring the major parties for example in 1983 SNP and Liberal Alliance won 25% of the votes and only got 3% of the seats whereas Labour won 27% of the vote and got 32% of the seats this shows the unfairness to smaller parties and it also explains why the Liberal democrats are the main political party calling for an electoral reform they argue it is not just for their party selfish benefits but for the good of the country as FPTP undermines democracy ...read more.


England is the only country in Europe to use FPTP electoral system in therefore it must not be the best choice however the UK has its own special needs for an electoral system. Minor parties not being represented may not be a disadvantage as extremist parties do not do well and small constituencies' views are taken into account. Parties like BNP are not doing well under FPTP this is surly is not disadvantage of FPTP. Elections in the European parliament show that using the proportional 'closed' regional list system parties such as the Green Party and the UK Independent Party have managed to get MEP's. FPTP although it is not proportional it is very simple and straight forward it would create much less spoilt ballots then a Proportional system or Majoritarain system in Scotland 2007 which uses AMS to elect MSP's had thousands of spoilt ballots this shows that it confuses the electorates and therefore undermines the governments legitimacy as the citizens did not understand the voting system. ...read more.


FPTP also supplies each constituency with their own member of parliament so close relationship between representative and their constituencies can take place other. Many politicians believe that constituency representation is one of the key strengths as the system links the voter with the representative other electoral system do not provide this for example the list system affect constituency representations voters choose a party not a candidate so there is no direct connection between the voter and the elected representatives. In conclusion I believe that there is no need for there to be an electoral reform although FPTP does not fulfil all electoral system functions there is no electoral system that does however FPTP is the best system for fulfilling what I believe is the most important functions of electoral system. As it is simple hold government to account, there is constituency representation it also shows clearly the most popular party. And alternative voting systems would cause much more of a concern. ?? ?? ?? ?? State a case for and against replacing the current voting system used to elect members of House of Commons. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Functions of the House of Commons and how it makes Government accountable.

    3 star(s)

    law or proposing a law without the whole of the House of commons know, not just the party in power, meaning it can be altered to suit the representation of the commons. As well as this, there is deep scrutiny into legislature.

  2. Democracy and Voting

    As a result of socialisation (parents, education influencing politics). Psychological attachment to party. Gone from 45% to 21% to 13% (2001). People often know who they'll vote for between 18 - 24 - link party with event. PARTISAN ALIGNMENT (long term political party alignment) The Sociological Theory: People's social characteristics (mostly social class).

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    The Broadsheets These are the newspapers more commonly read by those who are usually better educated and middle class, newspapers such as 'The Times', 'The Telegraph', and 'The Guardian', and their readers are considered to usually be more trusting of what is written, than those who read tabloid press, and

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    his opponents, the rest of the votes are then wasted as well. In 2001, according to the Electoral Reform Society, an astonishing 70.3% of the popular vote was wasted in one of these two ways. Furthermore, many of the seats are considered 'safe' by certain parties and do not normally

  1. Electoral Systems.

    The percentage of votes obtained by the parties in the party list vote determines their overall number of representatives; the party lists are used to top up the First-Past-The-Post seats gained by the party to the required number. So if a party has won two seats in the constituencies but

  2. Is the House of Commons effective at carrying out its various functions?

    Recently, however, there has been a serious problem with the deliberative function of parliament. It is now unnecessary for MPs to attend the House of Commons every day and to debate every topic. However, MPs do still have to attend and debate in the Commons in order to debate important

  1. The case Against Electoral Reform

    It achieves a significantly greater degree of proportionality.. It has long worked with on the whole beneficial results in the Republic of Ireland (as we have seen), a country which had previously shared at least a part of the British parliamentary tradition.

  2. Democracy and the British Voting System.

    or to pay money towards the governing and upkeep of the country; but not decide who runs it is completely illogical. Furthermore, it has been proved that lowering the voting age leads to a higher turnout, consequently combatting the democratic deficit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work