• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The European Union will be enlarged from 15 to 25 member countries. Another two might join in 2007. Should this be the end of enlargement?

Extracts from this document...


The European Union will be enlarged from 15 to 25 member countries. Another two might join in 2007. Should this be the end of enlargement? Elvira Gubayeva The European Union has been growing in size ever since its creation after the Second World War. It began as a post-war initiative between six countries pooling control over coal and steel to guarantee a more peaceful future for Europe. It now includes 15 member countries( Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom), has its own currency and has a lot of political power in global affairs. Plans have been made for a further enlargement of the Union to 25 member countries (Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia), while negotiations are continuing about the accession of Bulgaria and Romania. Although there are many people who argue for further enlargement, stating that this would increase stability in Europe, others argue that this should be the end of enlargement, mainly due to the disastrous economic consequences that further enlargement could bring about. ...read more.


As well as that, the enlarged European Union would become stronger in its fight against crime and illegal immigration as there would be greater aid from new member countries. As far as politics are concerned, further enlargement could strengthen its role in foreign affairs, security policy, trade policy and other fields of global governance. Having said that, there are also disadvantages to further enlargement. Firstly, the accession of new member countries would increase the budgetary contributions of existing countries. This would be used to stabilise the economies of future member countries to fit to European Union standards. The great majority of countries likely to be brought into the EU by enlargement are below the poverty level. For example, Poland has a GDP per head that is less than half of the current European Union average. Secondly, there is a possibility of what is called social dumping. This means that workers from poorer accession countries would migrate to the West in search of employment.Unemployment in accession countries and countries wanting to join the European Union is already higher than the unemployment rate in countries which are part of the European Union. ...read more.


The cultures of different countries would mix, thus dissolving each country's own culture. Overall, although there are many advantages to further enlargement, the possible consequences that this enlargement could bring outweigh them. The larger the Union becomes, the less power it will have as there would be such a great number of factors that would need to be adressed, such as financial aid. Negotiations would be slow and ineffective as more member countries would provoke more disagreements. The enlargement would have a particularly negative effect on existing member countries, who would have to increase their taxations in order to help new member countries. Citizens should also be put into account and from a recent survey conducted in the United Kingdom, a member country, most people are negative in their responses whether the European Union should be further enlarged. Many people argue that Europe would lose its identity if its culture becomes so intermixed with other cultures. Therefore, the European Union should think very carefully about enlargement and its consequences in order to avoid it becoming ineffective as a system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    Sweden, the official language of Sweden is Swedish and Lapp. The population is roughly 40 million and the country has not adopted the single currency the Euro. Sweden is economically struggling and many people are leave for UK and France for work.

  2. The Foreign Policy of Great Britain in relationship to the European Union.

    aims have been satisfied at the Nice summit.15 Unanimity was maintained or QMV was adopted in all areas that Britain considered as necessary. Of the articles that move to QMV, just 11 are appointments or changes in rules of procedure.

  1. Why are developing countries unhappy with the global arrangements under the Bretton Woods system?

    decide whether or not the country is eligible for financial assistance (Elliot, 2003:123). The first stage in this process is known as the 'decision point' and involves a wide scale analysis of the country in question and aid is only provided if said country adheres to the conditions prescribed by the organisation (Elliot, 2003:123).

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    ever closer union among the peoples of Europe? One way to reconcile is denial -- by rejecting the notion of a European demos. The implications of this No Demos thesis, espoused, among others, by the German Constitutional Court, is to deny any meaningful democratization of the Union at the European

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank (3), Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article251 of the Treaty (4), Whereas: (1)

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    U.S. Response to the Challenge and Washington Summit (1999) The U.S. showed a quick and effective response to the St.Malo summit. The Secretary of State Madeleine Albright made it clear that the U.S. supports the ESDI within the alliance; however, it was rejecting the ideas of "autonomous action" that would be implemented by the EU, "discrimination" against non-EU members,

  1. International Economics

    to the bigger, better off places causing more competition for jobs in these areas which will in effect lead to high unemployment figures. Another major factor would be that the EU would dictate the amount of government spending each country can do, is that really what we want to live

  2. Austria - An economic and political overview.

    If the FPO works tactfully they could get even stronger within Austria, as long as they promote the "us against them" feeling. For the EU this would probably fall under a list of "bad things", and if it happens that, for example, the FPO gets a majority vote in the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work