• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were Political and Economic reasons responsible for post 1945 European Integration.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent were Political and Economic reasons responsible for post 1945 European Integration The end of the Second World War left Europe in pieces; Literally, politically and economically. France and Germany lay at the core of the devastation caused by years of battle, other countries lay scarred and even unoccupied states such as Britain still suffered heavy losses of life and money. Politically the continent was on the floor. Germany and Italy obviously had a large outsider status due to Fascism, The US and her allies occupied western Europe, and the Russian army controlled the Balkans and eastern Europe up to Berlin. This created the main ideological divide in Europe, splitting it into a capitalist west and a communist east. The most divided part of Europe lay in the centre, with Germany split into East and West, with both Russian and US forces fully occupying. German recovery represented a threat to Stalin's Russia, and an essential mode of European recovery to the US. Due to action and reaction from both sides of the country, military presence was stepped up in the years after the war to boiling point. ...read more.

Middle

In 1958, as the cold war continued, with its frigid centre and flashpoint peripheries, the treaties of Rome were signed and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the European Economic Community (EEC) were established, thanks largely to pushing from the Benelux countries. On January 1st, 1958, the six ECSC states became the EEC. The most impressive effect this had was to 'bring back' West Germany and Italy into Europe. This answered the French 'German question'. German economic strength was not feared like military strength, but was seen to aid its neighbours. The formation of the EEC was a delicate balance of economic necessity and ideological concern. As the EEC took shape, in the early 1960's Britain wanted a piece of the action. In 1963 France, however, vetoed Britain's entry into the EEC fearing there was not enough room for another large country in the organisation. Again in 1965 French President Charles De Gaulle blocked the introduction of majority voting, saying that he wanted a "Europe des patries"1, not a supranational body. De Gaulle's sentiments were felt elsewhere however, as he also believed in independence from the superpowers, as any felt that Europe was being used as the board for an ideological game. ...read more.

Conclusion

The EEC was reborn as the EU and 3 more states joined, bringing the total number up to 12, however the bloody conflict in Yugoslavia highlighted the EU's military impotency. In 1995 the 12 became 15 and it was clear that the world was changing greatly. Globalisation and modern technology means that big businesses have forced a certain level of integration upon the world. The first decade of the EU saw the creation of a single common market with internal tariffs abolished and externals placed. The EU is now the worlds largest single trading block and in 2004 a staggering ten more countries will sign up, bringing the total member states to 25. More interesting still is that these states are all the old soviet states. The membership will mean a final end to European division and completeness to the process of integration that has taken place since 1949. I believe that although much of the processes of integration that have been outlined here were due to economic musts and ideological deterrency and promotion. The seeds that have always been sewn for European stages of integration have been sewn out of a basic necessity, a necessity to right what has been done wrong before, to never allow horrors of the past to take place again. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Why did the witch-craze happen in Early Modern Europe?

    These disturbances terrified members of the ruling classes throughout Europe and these fears were reflected in the imagery of witches17. In conclusion it appears that on all sides the myth was built up and sustained. Within this there were local differences, as well as differences of time, jurisdiction and procedure.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    There are many threats being in the single market especially the competition listed above, Boots has to market its products according top each country its operating as not all the EU countries speak language, have the same religion and they all have different beliefs.

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    He tried to persuade the Five, without France, trying to convince them Britain was needed for Europe to become a great force. But the Five didn't want to loose France by letting Britain join, France went on to veto the application with the reason of Britain's entry was only to

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    But when we turn to the text of Articles 138d and 138e, we find that in the first place, the rights, even of petition and a complaint against maladministration, are restricted to matters which comes within the Community's fields of activity as if the citizen cannot be directly harmed by

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Table 3 summarizes some data on the volume and value of transactions processed by TARGET. 2003 2002 volume value (billions) volume value (billions) total 5,550,667 35,062 3,036,192 18,624 cross-border 1,271,090 11,407 646,296 5,820 Table 3: Volume of transfers through TARGET.

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    On the other hand, efforts to create ESDP (European Security and Defense Policy) by EU and its role as the main source of restriction for the United States to reformulate its frame of security hegemony is the other side of the coin. In this study, I will outline the U.S.

  1. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    To be fair to the Schr�der government, the Bush administration effectively suspended all consultation with Germany on US policy towards Iraq in the latter half of 2002. The timing was inopportune as Schr�der and his Social Democratic Party (SPD) were trailing badly in the German federal election campaign at the time of Cheney's [August 2002] speech.

  2. Austria - An economic and political overview.

    First of all they did loose there independence and did not have any political influence after the Anschluss. But more important for Austria's future, was the position the Allies took on the Austrian issue. In November 1943, the foreign ministers of the Soviet Union, Britain, and the United States met and issued the Moscow Declaration.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work