• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were Political and Economic reasons responsible for post 1945 European Integration.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent were Political and Economic reasons responsible for post 1945 European Integration The end of the Second World War left Europe in pieces; Literally, politically and economically. France and Germany lay at the core of the devastation caused by years of battle, other countries lay scarred and even unoccupied states such as Britain still suffered heavy losses of life and money. Politically the continent was on the floor. Germany and Italy obviously had a large outsider status due to Fascism, The US and her allies occupied western Europe, and the Russian army controlled the Balkans and eastern Europe up to Berlin. This created the main ideological divide in Europe, splitting it into a capitalist west and a communist east. The most divided part of Europe lay in the centre, with Germany split into East and West, with both Russian and US forces fully occupying. German recovery represented a threat to Stalin's Russia, and an essential mode of European recovery to the US. Due to action and reaction from both sides of the country, military presence was stepped up in the years after the war to boiling point. ...read more.

Middle

In 1958, as the cold war continued, with its frigid centre and flashpoint peripheries, the treaties of Rome were signed and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the European Economic Community (EEC) were established, thanks largely to pushing from the Benelux countries. On January 1st, 1958, the six ECSC states became the EEC. The most impressive effect this had was to 'bring back' West Germany and Italy into Europe. This answered the French 'German question'. German economic strength was not feared like military strength, but was seen to aid its neighbours. The formation of the EEC was a delicate balance of economic necessity and ideological concern. As the EEC took shape, in the early 1960's Britain wanted a piece of the action. In 1963 France, however, vetoed Britain's entry into the EEC fearing there was not enough room for another large country in the organisation. Again in 1965 French President Charles De Gaulle blocked the introduction of majority voting, saying that he wanted a "Europe des patries"1, not a supranational body. De Gaulle's sentiments were felt elsewhere however, as he also believed in independence from the superpowers, as any felt that Europe was being used as the board for an ideological game. ...read more.

Conclusion

The EEC was reborn as the EU and 3 more states joined, bringing the total number up to 12, however the bloody conflict in Yugoslavia highlighted the EU's military impotency. In 1995 the 12 became 15 and it was clear that the world was changing greatly. Globalisation and modern technology means that big businesses have forced a certain level of integration upon the world. The first decade of the EU saw the creation of a single common market with internal tariffs abolished and externals placed. The EU is now the worlds largest single trading block and in 2004 a staggering ten more countries will sign up, bringing the total member states to 25. More interesting still is that these states are all the old soviet states. The membership will mean a final end to European division and completeness to the process of integration that has taken place since 1949. I believe that although much of the processes of integration that have been outlined here were due to economic musts and ideological deterrency and promotion. The seeds that have always been sewn for European stages of integration have been sewn out of a basic necessity, a necessity to right what has been done wrong before, to never allow horrors of the past to take place again. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    This belief was confirmed by the European states through the separation of Germany and later on with the developments in Central Europe such as 1956 Soviet intervention to Hungary. Worn-torn European states including Britain was lacking in the economic and political depth to resist this challenge alone.

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    Empowering the European Parliament is no solution and could -- to the extent that it weakens the Council (the voice of the Member States) -- actually exacerbate the legitimacy problem of the Community. On this view, a parliament without a demos is conceptually impossible, practically despotic.

  1. Examine the reasons for the different attitudes to European integration in Denmark, Finland, Norway ...

    On this background, the new 'single market EC' emerged as an increasingly attractive alternative.2 The future of Norwegian fishery regime and non-competitive agriculture were among the hardest issues to solve. The result of the referendum showed that the government had not succeeded in convincing the voters entirely on these points.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    the following when launching a product internationally as some colours and brands are seen to cause offence in certain countries. These can be historic sights such the leaning tower of pizza in Italy or the Dome in UK. Education, in certain countries if not all is very important, as this

  1. The French Revolution

    As a result, there were many people who were forced to work at the new factories being built. This meant they had to move to towns and cities so that they could be close to their new jobs. It also meant that they made less money for working longer hours.

  2. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    Though the EU by-and-large prefers to work through the UN in matters of war and peace, ironically, it does not exist at the UN as a legal personality. And thus the EU is left to work through a Security Council which invites Britain and France, the respective ringleaders of opposing

  1. Evaluate the view thatEuropean integration and not, extended cooperation between states, was the onlyconceivable ...

    What they were mostly focused on was economic reconstruction throughout the states. Understanding the context of the Cold War, the tension between the capitalist West and the Communist Soviet Union, is also essential to characterise the origins of the EU.

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    and customs checks were abolished at most of the EU's internal borders. Free trade means: No barriers (free trade movement), No Quota (No limits on the goods set), No Tariff (No taxes set for the goods), No Exchange Controls (Limiting the liability of the foreign currency).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work