• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which do you consider to be the more powerful chief executive in his or her own country: The British Prime Minister or the President of The United States?

Extracts from this document...


Which do you consider to be the more powerful chief executive in his or her own country: The British Prime Minister or the President of The United States? The British PM and the American President operate within different political frameworks. To draw comparisons we must look at these frameworks and determine the contexts under which both figures must govern. Yet before we do this it is important to note that chief executive power can be loosely defined as the ability to influence other branches of Government. Therefore the extent to which each chief executive can do this is the key to answering this question. The most important issue to look at first is the structure of Government in the respective countries. In Britain a fusion of powers exists. The three branches of Government (Executive, Legislature and Judiciary) are merged. The executive branch (the government) can exercise direct control over the legislative branch (parliament). Therefore the executive branch can formulate policy and force the legislative branch to accept it. This has become known as an elective dictatorship and the Prime Minister stands at the apex of this. In contrast, the United States operates a separation of powers. ...read more.


Unburdened by a written constitution, the PM has a formidable array of powers. He is both head of Government and leader of his party, with enormous powers of patronage. For instance, within his own Cabinet, the PM has the power to hire & fire, promote and demote. In addition the PM can determine the size of the Cabinet and which jobs are to be in it. Indeed, Ministries and Cabinet positions can be combined, created or abolished e.g. Tony Blair created the position of Deputy PM for John Prescott in 1997. Richard Crossman proposed the idea of the PM as an all-powerful figure in 1960, which became known as the Presidential model. He argued that the PM could dominate all areas of policy and intervene in any department that he chooses. He continued to say that the Cabinet could be routinely subordinated and even ignored. So much so that it is a 'dignified' part of the constitution such as the Lords and the Monarchy. Indeed from this perspective, Cabinet has been reduced to a mere rubber stamp through the notion of collective responsibility. This states that all Ministers must defend a decision publicly or else resign from Government. ...read more.


For instance, President Kennedy proposed his great society programme in the early sixties but failed to get Congress to pass it. After his assassination, Lyndon Johnson took over and achieved success where Kennedy failed. The reason for this was Johnson's intimidating demeanour and considerable experience in Congress, which allowed him to manipulate the body in a way that Kennedy could not. This proves the importance of different people with different skills. Therefore to conclude neither Chief Executive is without constraints, although the UK Prime Minister is certainly the more powerful within his or her own country. He is not constrained by an assertive judiciary or legislature like his American counterpart. Furthermore the UK doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty means that parliament can make or unmake any law it chooses, a body that is in turn dominated by the Prime Minister. His strength is reinforced further by the lack of a codified constitution, which means that the role of the PM is 'what the office holder chooses and is able to make of it' (Asquith 1908-16). The American President however, enjoys none of these advantages. His power is that of persuasion, which if used effectively, can significantly influence policy direction. The use of the veto is his most powerful weapon since it is difficult to override. 2,085 words. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Leadership styles

    3 star(s)

    The democratic approach is viewed positively as it gains employees' respect and it can produce high-quality work over long periods of time from highly motivated teams. Employees and team members also feel in control of their own destiny, such as gaining promotion and progressing up the ladder.

  2. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    For such reasons, members of Congress, especially Representatives, are usually more independent when it comes to voting. Despite the success of presidents such as FDR in maintaining strong party loyalty in Congress, the example of Presidents such as Carter show that party loyalty is not often guaranteed or even expected in the US system.

  1. Compare and contrast the position and powers of the US president and the UK ...

    America and though a member of G7, our economic standing in the world is dwarfed by America's. Such a position does not allow the Prime Minister to drive an international agenda whereas the US president can. In this sense, the power of the US president abroad is far greater than that of the British Prime Minister.

  2. The office is what the holder chooses to make of it. Access the accuracy ...

    Bush, on the other hand, is under no party obligation; his obligation is one directly to the people. Even so he cannot be removed before his four year term is up, unless by the legislature, for misconduct, through the impeachment process, though it is an extremely rare occurrence for a president to face impeachment.

  1. Free essay

    Identify and Discuss the Role of Prime Minister, Giving Specific Examples within the British ...

    often made to the comparability of the British Prime Minister and the American Presidency" (Foley, 1994). During an interview Mrs Thatcher stated that "I am not a consensus politician. I believe in the politics of persuasion: it is my job to put forward what I believe and try to get other people to agree with me" (Observer 25th February 1979).

  2. How Dominant Is the Prime Minister within the British system of Government?

    After Thatcher John Major's style of leadership represented working with the cabinet to build a consensus, which was needed at the time. Blair being aware of how support is important owed his position in lots of ways to Gordon Brown's loyalty as Brown decided not to challenge against Blair.

  1. How powerful is the Prime Minister?

    Although, this also means that decisions are harder to reach. This could be seen when Peter Mandelson was made business secretary and brought into Brown?s cabinet in 2008, despite the fact the two men were bitter enemies. This is an example of a PM conciliating a powerful colleague because of their high standing within the party.

  2. Is the Prime Minister now effectively a President? [40 marks]

    This shows a similarity between the British central government and White House machineries. It can be seen, therefore, that under Blair?s government, he would take on some of the responsibilities not usually done by a traditional PM, but ones that are done by a head of state.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work