• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who rules in France? What factors determine the actual powers of the President and Prime minister of France?

Extracts from this document...


Who rules in France? What factors determine the actual powers of the President and Prime minister of France? In France, no single person rules the country but the power is shared between the President and the Prime minister. The President and Prime ministers both have different powers and responsibilities which are generally set by the constitution but can be altered by various external factors such as the political climate at the time and external controls. According to Vincent Wright (1978) the president of France can be said to have five basic functions: he is the head of state, the guardian of the national interest, the fountain head of patronage, the country's most prominent politician and finally the head of the executive. The President is expected to carry out ceremonial duties, make courtesy visits abroad and accredit ambassadors. He is also seen as the most significant and dominant politician with strong leadership qualities and charisma- 'De Gaulle like imperious rulers in non-democratic regimes virtually monopolized the mass media and used the press conference not so much to enlighten the people as to appeal for national unity'1. However, now must also consider the President's strong political power. The Constitution of 4 October 1958 had provided for the election of the President of the Republic by indirect universal suffrage by an electoral college comprising the members of Parliament and various representatives of local elected officials. ...read more.


He has a valid point, indeed, some of the presidential powers may be overlapping, even conflicting with those of the Prime ministers. The particular voting system adopted by a system may affect the outcome of the election and therefore determine the power given to a particular party. First-past-the-post voting was introduced by General de Gaulle as an antidote to the instability which had plagued the governments of the Fourth Republic and which had been largely due to proportional representation. The proportional system was brought back for the 1986 general election by the Socialist government - which was seeking better representation for small political groups The 1986 cohabitation brought a new stage of party development in the temporary non-coincidence of the presidential and parliamentary majorities. The President promised to stay in office unless the new majority blocked his constitutional powers. Two years later the first past the post system was reinstated and has remained in tact ever since. However, this cohabitation must have changed the power balance between the President and Prime minister. The President used to be more far more dominant prior to this cohabitation but this power sharing changed things. William Saffran stated that 'In 1988 much of the Presidents power was restored yet his relationship to the Premier has remained ambiguous considering both his policy disagreements with Rocard and the fact ...read more.


Dreyfus also recognises that there are legal restrictions by which 'the state is made to respect the law'8. Laws can be submitted to different bodies such as the Constitutional council, the council of state, The European commission and the European court of justice. Another restraint on the powers of the President and Prime minister are extra-institutional controls. They are not laid down in documents but can be in the form of interest and pressure groups. The media also has a lot of influence when it comes to the policy and power. The case of the Le Monde newspaper is significant as it played a major role in the resignation of the defence secretary after the Rainbow warrior fiasco of 1985. 1 Saffran, W.1991 (Third edition), The French Polity,pg 155 New York, Longman Press 2 Saffran, W.1991 (Third edition), The French Polity, pg 152 New York, Longman Press 3 Macridis, RC 1975, French Politics In Transition: The years after DeGaulle, pg 8,Cambright, Mass. Winthrop publishing. 4 Saffran, W.1991 (Third edition), The French Polity, pg 158 New York, Longman Press 5 Saffran, W.1991 (Third edition), The French Polity, pg 151 New York, Longman Press 6 Wright, V. 1978, The Government and Politics of France,pg 108, London, Hutchinson 7 Dreyfus F, (Taken from Hall, P et all,1990, Developments in French Politics, pg 134, London, Macmillan 8 Dreyfus F, (Taken from Hall, P et all,1990, Developments in French Politics, pg 134, London, Macmillan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    Bush too, had great success in using the veto, defeated only once from 1988 to 1993. The power of the pocket veto has also become an effective weapon of the president in controlling legislation, since it can not be overturned and needs not be explained, and moreover, can be used

  2. Compare and contrast the position and powers of the US president and the UK ...

    they have both had an input into proposed legislation, why would a veto be needed? The input both president and Prime Minister have in the judiciary is about equal. Within the Supreme Court, the president can only appoint a Supreme Court judge if a sitting one has retired or has died.

  1. The comparison of the US President and the British Prime Minister appears from the ...

    Undoubtedly, the prime minister appears to hold a considerable advantage in controlling his party, much more so than the president, who is faced with a disunited party system and the lack of a working authority with his party colleagues. The power, which each office holds over the passage of legislation,

  2. The Prime Ministers Powers Of Patronage

    Blair also dismissed Peter Mandelson, who was twice forced to leave cabinet posts when his behavior was questioned. Such examples illustrate the powers available to the prime minister, helping to explain the continued prevalence of a high level of collective responsibility in the cabinets supporting of the PM.

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Disadvantages of First-Past-The-Post * Disproportionate - FPTP does not award seats in proportion to the total votes cast, this system discriminates in favour of some parties against others. Winning parties win a considerably higher proportion of seats than votes. For Example Labour in 1997 won 43.3% of the vote but was converted to a 63.4% landslide of the available seats.

  2. To what extent has the post of Prime minister become more presidential?

    The Prime Minister, in addition, has personal human constraints such as tiredness, for instance recent media speculation regarding Blair's health and considerations for his young family has been widespread. It has been said Thatcher was a workaholic working long hours into the night.

  1. The relationship between the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

    His role, therefore, is not constrained by departmental responsibilities: the Chancellor has the treasury, the Foreign Minister has the Foreign Office, but the Prime Minister is relatively independent in his workings, as a lot of his job involves Public Relations.

  2. Discuss the powers and constraints on the power of the Prime Minister

    Tony Blair was fortunate between 1997 and 2005 with two large majorities. This was an important factor in his success, and his ability and his government?s ability to get programs passed in parliament. However, it is arguable that because his majority was so huge, some dissidents on the backbench were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work