• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why has the concept of humanitarian intervention provoked so much debate in political commentary?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Murad Khalimov Why has the concept of humanitarian intervention provoked so much debate in political commentary? Humanitarian intervention encompasses the international community?s actions to assist the population of a state experiencing severe human suffering caused by political collapse, deliberate government policy or natural disaster. The principles that guide humanitarian intervention continue to be a matter of heated debate. The issue is not whether there exists a compelling need and moral obligation to express concerns about populations at risk of slaughter, starvation, or persecution; the issue is about how to craft a just response, when any response will comprise interference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign state. Humanitarian intervention is controversial because it pits the legal principle of territorial sovereignty against what some see as a moral duty to protect vulnerable populations from egregious violations of human rights. While the construction of global human rights norms has made great strides over the past sixty years, the enforcement of human rights laws has lagged. Within the UN, the OHCHR is responsible for implementing international human rights agreements, overseeing major human rights programs, and providing global leadership on the promotion and protection of human rights. ...read more.


In response to these limitations, nongovernmental organizations have assumed an important role in promoting human rights. They have developed an array of transnational advocacy networks and strategies designed to pressure governments to modify their behaviour to conform to prevailing human rights norms and laws. With greater openness to institutional activism in the post-Cold War era, human rights activist have pressed to strengthen enforcement mechanisms. Their efforts account in part for the establishment of UN tribunals to review gross human rights abuse, as in the cases of the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and the creation of the ICC. Activists are also credited with monitoring human rights situations and targeting a ?spotlight? of publicity and public scrutiny on abusive practices to shame those that violate human rights into changing their behaviour. While some individuals remain sceptical of claims that we all have transcendent moral obligations to humanity as a whole, others believe that everyone, by virtue of being human, has certain inherent and inalienable rights that warrant international protection. Challenging the realist premise that human rights are at odds with national interest, Executive Director of Amnesty International William Schulz laments ...read more.


Some argue that it is justified as Gaddafi used air forces against his own people and so in order to stop genocide should be stopped form doing so. However others argue that Libya is sovereign country and so west have no right to intervene regardless of what going on in there. Also West can be accused in having double standards. While bombing Libya for ?human rights abuses? it ignores the Bahrain government that already killed quite a few of protesters in the country. Bahrain government is supported by Saudi Arabia, the closed US ally in the Middle East, and so nobody seems to be interested what is going on there. Therefore we can argue that there is no real answer when humanitarian intervention can be used. Maybe Libya was attacked only because of huge media coverage and hysteria? So although there is an emergent norm in support of humanitarian intervention it is still the subject of debate. Because states will never intervene in all situations of humanitarian emergency, state sovereignty remains intact. But in the case of widely recognized gross violations and when military intervention does not conflict with other national interests, then humanitarian intervention is seen as a justified use of force. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Liberalism Notes

    Paine a liberal? (uncompromising individualism, sympathies with manfacturers, hostility to government). Or a socialist? (Blueprint for the Welfare State, support for graduated income tax, inspiration for Chartists). More impact in USA/France than in Britain - seen as dangerous due to uncompromising republicanism, total opposition to hereditary principle, rejection of Christianity.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    The development, or lack therein, is a consequence of individual motivation and is manifested through labor. In keeping with the theory of one's body is one's own, a man's property can be explained in terms of the quantifying forces of his labors.

  1. Is the practice of humanitarian intervention compatible with an international system that is based ...

    Humanitarian intervention is a new idea in our human history, and it frequently faces challenges for its legitimacy. One example can be observed from this particular case study of Vietnam's intervention of Khmar Rouge's genocide regime. During April 1975, Cambodia came under the control of Khmar Rouge and resulted in killing of 1.3 million citizens.

  2. How have political sociologist understood globalization? Globalization is perhaps the central concept of ...

    This more complex formulation clearly implies that cultural identity is not likely to be the easy prey of globalization. This is because identity is not in fact merely some delicate communal-psychic attachment, but a considerable dimension of institutionalized social life in modernity.

  1. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    before 1930 and the failure of export orientated economics after 1930 allowed both countries to introduce a new strategy of economic development called Import Substitution Industrialisation (ISI). What this did was allow both countries to move away from the dependency of export economics and adopt a strategy of development that

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    were better concentrated on the party-based proportional representation contests, and candidates learned that party backing is not the key to victory in single-member district races. There are three related factors that substantially mitigate against any change in this situation. First is that the rules governing nomination as a candidate deemphasize the role of parties.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    a waste of resources but also a one-way ticket to political bankruptcy. This and other aspects of public/political-sector organizations to be discussed below make for a good deal of messiness-in organizational boundaries; in the specification of organizational missions and authority; in the functional, territorial, and hierarchical division of labor that relates to policy-making and policy execution; and so on.

  2. Is humanitarian intervention justifiable?

    This therefore shows political untruthfulness due to the fact that nations are using humanitarian intervention as a cover for their personal interest. Additionally, there is also a view that the citizens and the issues of a certain country are of that county?s business only and outside intervention is unnecessary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work