• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23

An investigation in to the effects of time on memory.

Extracts from this document...


An investigation in to the effects of time on memory Author: Kevin Walker Location: Castle College Sheffield Date: October 2003 Index Ref. Page 1.0 Abstract 3 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Introduction * Aims * Experimental Hypothesis * Null Hypothesis 4 6 6 6 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Method * Design * Participants * Apparatus/Materials * Standard Procedures * Controls & Ethics * Pilot Study 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 4.0 4.1 4.2 Results * Raw Data * Graphical Representations 11 11 12 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Discussion * Explanation of Findings * Relationship to Background * Research Limitations and Modifications * Implications and Suggestions 13 14 14 14 15 6.0 Conclusions 16 7.0 Appendices * Mann-Whitney Statistical Test * Instructions * Questions * Data Analysis * Book & Study References 18 19 20 21 22 23 1.0 Abstract Peterson & Peterson's studies show that traces of memory disappeared over a period of time from short-term memory. Baddeley & Hitch and Atkinson & Shiffrin produced models of memory that state rehearsal is necessary to encode short-term memories in to longer-term memories. However, Craik & Lockhart argued that cognitive processes encode information to long-term memory and stated that 'If the information has more meaning then it should be more memorable'. My study sets out to test the prediction that a time delay will affect the amount of information that can be recalled from memory. The participants will be given a stimulus material to watch. Half the participants will answer questions immediately after the viewing and half after a 1-week time delay. The study was a laboratory experiment and individual group design with two groups of four female and one male answering questions on the stimulus material. Comparisons between the free recall of information by the two group conditions were analysed and statistically tested by the Mann-Whitney test. The results suggest that less relevant information is displaced or subject to trace decay from short-term memory and more meaningful information is encoded to long-term memory over the delayed time period. ...read more.


I also told the participants that they could ask to leave the experiment at ant time during the video if they found any of the source material offensive or distressing. 6. The lights were dimmed and the video was played 7. The participants were split in to two groups of five and the groups were called the GREEN & BLUE groups. As previous stated they were so designated to avoid experimental apprehension due to being labelled group 1 or A. 8. The BLUE group were invited to leave the viewing room and the GREEN group remained behind. 9. The GREEN group were given a standard question & answer sheet (see appendix 3) and I read through the instructions at the top of the sheet. I explained the following points: a. We wanted the participants to answer the questions in the order they were asked and to leave answers blank if they could not remember the information the question solicited. This was to avoid cued recall i.e. information in a later question reminding them of the answer to an earlier question. b. Not to guess answers as this is an experiment in to free recall of memory and guesswork could give a negative or positive distortion to the results. c. Their identity and results would remain anonymous at all times, however, the results they produced would be analysed as part of the experiment. 10. The participants were given the opportunity to withdraw. 11. The answers were completed collected and retained by the experimenter. 12. The Condition BLUE group were taken through exactly the same procedure 1-week later. 3.5 Controls & Ethics - To ensure the well-being of the participants taking part in the experiment I made a conscious effort to ensure: * No deception took place. * Each participant understood the aims of the experiment and what was expected of him or her. Emphasis was placed on the confidentiality of the participant and results to ensure they did not feel apprehensive about their performance and ...read more.


The calculated value of U' (25) is checked against the Mann-Whitney tabled value for a one-tailed hypothesis at 5%. NA = 5 NB = 4 2 Conclusion. As (U') 25 is greater than 2 from the Mann-Whitney table the Null Hypothesis should be rejected i.e. Participants recall of details contained in videotape will not be affected by a time delay of 1-week. Instructions Questions Book & Study References APPENDIX 2 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTICIPANTS You have given your permission to participate in our experiment. The experiment we are carrying out is about memory. You will all be shown a short video clip (approx. 10 mins) after that you will be given some questions about the clip to answer. You are asked to concentrate on the video clip and to sit in a position of good visibility and we would request that you do not take notes as this is a test of memory. None of your names will be used and we can assure you full confidentiality will be observed. Although this is not a test of your individual ability the answers you give to the questions will be analysed and used for the purposes of this experiment. We would warn you that from the outset the video clip does contain some strong language. You also have the right to withdraw from the experiment at any time be it before, during or after the video clip. You also have the right to ask any questions about the procedures. You are asked not to discuss the contents of the video of the questions with other participants until the experiment is fully complete and the results obtained. Is everyone happy to continue? Thank you. APPENDIX 3 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTICIPANTS & QUESTIONS Answer the questions in the order they are given. Please do not guess answers, this is a free recall memory experiment, only write in an answer if you think you know the correct answer. Please do not go back to earlier questions that you did not answer, leave them blank. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    Bahrick, Bahrick and Wittinger (1975) produced a demonstration of very long-term memory by using photography from high school yearbooks. Ex-students were asked to name other students out of the yearbook and most people remembered nearly 90% of all the people featured in the yearbook.

  2. How interference affects memory recall

    And do like my study where the participant who had no interference have had better memory recall compared to participants who had interference of music for 1minute 30 seconds had less memory recall and so my study supports the study of Peterson and Peterson study.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    bowl consisting of 15 names of each sex, then 10 names of each sex was randomly picked out of a bowl. The 20 participants drawn randomly were put into 2 groups of 10 (consisting of 5 of each sex in each group), each names for each group were selected randomly again.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    There was a much larger difference in the scores on Test B than the scores on Test B. Relationship of Results to Hypothesis In my experimental hypothesis I predicted that there would be a significant difference in the amount of words recalled from a list of un-chunked words than a list of chunked words.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    and the last 10 words (positioned from 21-30) of a list will have a higher recall than the middle 10 words (positioned from 11-20) Null Hypothesis: There will be no significant difference in the words recalled wherever the words are positioned in a list. Whether they are the first 10, second 10 or the last 10.

  2. An investigation about retrieval failure in memory (retrieval cues) whether participants can recall more ...

    they had the right to withdraw so that no one felt reassure into to doing it also at the end of the experiment in the debrief telling them they could withdraw at the end and I did not have to collect their results if they did not want me to do so.

  1. Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using ...

    Interference explains forgetting in the long term memory, confusion is caused by other similar memories, and one of these can dominate the other to cause forgetting. Interference splits into two parts, proactive and retroactive. Retroactive is when a new memory causes us to forget an old memory, and it is

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    These are physical symptoms created by activation of the nervous system. Your experience of stress is caused by the biological processes involved. The nervous system is divided into the central nervous system (CNS) and the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which is further subdivided into the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work