• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An investigation into the effect free and cued recall has on the retrieval of information

Extracts from this document...


An investigation into the effect free and cued recall has on the retrieval of information. Contents Abstract Introduction Aims Hypothesis Method - Design Participants Materials Procedure Results Discussion References Appendix 1 - Brief, Standardised Instructions and Debrief. Appendix 2 - Word list Appendix 3 - Cued recall sample answer sheet Appendix 4 - Free recall sample answer sheet Appendix 5 - Full results and calculations Abstract This is an experiment investigating the effects cues have on the recall of information based on the investigation by Tulving and Pearlstone (1966). In their investigation participants were given a list of words comprising 12 categories with 4 words under each category to study and then to recall as many words as possible. The participants were either given a blank sheet or a sheet with category titles on it. Cues can be used as a way to trigger memory and to remember information. The hypothesis to be proved is whether the participants remember more words from the word list if they are given cues. The participants used are students from Exeter College, during college hours. The participants will be male and female between the ages of 16-19. There were 10 students in each condition. The investigation was carried out using independent measures design and the participants were gathered using opportunity sampling. The experiment itself was a sheet of A4 paper with 48 words written on it. The participants were given a set amount of time to study the sheet before it was taken off of them. ...read more.


from waking up or too tired from the day and at a time when there were not too many other students around. Materials The question sheet consisted of 12 randomly selected categories, with each category containing 4 words. The list of 48 words was presented to participants, who were then asked to study the words for 60 seconds, after that time the question sheet was taken off them and replaced by the answer sheet and a pen. The answer sheet differed depending on which condition the participant took part in. in the cued recall condition the answer sheet showed the category titles whilst the free recall answer sheet was blank. All participants were given the same standardised instructions and were all briefed and debriefed. (See appendix) Ethical issues Before the experiment took place, the participant was briefed and made aware that they were free to leave the experiment at any time, permission was asked to use their results and that they would remain confidential. A set of standardised instructions was used. At the end of the experiment the participants were fully debriefed and given an opportunity to ask any questions. This was done to make sure the participants understood their right to withdraw and that they gave an informed consent of taking part in this study. (See appendix for the standardised instructions, brief and debrief.) Procedure Participants were approached on the Exeter College; Hele Road site outside the reception and asked if they would not mind taking part in a psychological experiment. ...read more.


After 60 seconds I will take that sheet away and replace it with either a blank or a sheet with the category titles on it. You will then have as much time as you need to recall as many words as you can, in any order. Do you still wish to continue? Debrief Thank you for participating, do you still agree to your results being used, confidentially, in this experiment? This experiment was conducted to investigate whether retrieval cues have an effect on the recall of information. It is expected that the participants will recall more words if they are given cues, as this should trigger the memory. Do you have any questions? Thank you, Signed Date Table showing all scores gained from the investigation Participant - Free Recall Number of words recalled (Free) Participant - Cued Recall Number of words recalled (Cued) 1 20 1 39 2 19 2 42 3 15 3 40 4 13 4 22 5 16 5 39 6 21 6 41 7 15 7 32 8 19 8 43 9 18 9 30 10 16 10 37 Total 172 365 Calculations for mean score. 172/10 = 17.2 365/10 = 36.5 Word list Food Drink Animals Transport Sausage Water Meerkat Car Potato Beer Hedgehog Train Pepper Vimto Elephant Bike Radish Vodka Squirrel Walk Bike Colour Shape Body Part BMX Red Circle Leg Mountain Yellow Square Arm Racing Purple Triangle Head Stunt Blue Rectangle Feet Car Material Music Artist Vauxhall Glass Rock Van Gogh Peugeot Metal Punk Turner Ford Wood Pop Klimt BMW Cotton Rap Picasso Appendices By Jess Howell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays


    Here there will be 2 groups of 20 participants. This is split into 2 sets of 10 in which will see 10 do the experiment in the morning and 10 in the afternoon. This will be repeated with the 2nd group where the distraction would be tested.

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    in the 2nd condition the standard deviation was high which refers to the mean not being reliable and therefore results being far from it. A less wide spread of data would help us come to more detailed conclusion in which less mistakes would have occurred.

  1. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    Ethical considerations These are important to the experiment, as it should be ethical. Firstly informed consent must be given. This is done when the instructions are given out as it explains the experiment fully and the participants are given the option to discontinue with the experiment at any time that he/she feels uncomfortable or upset with what is going on.

  2. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    of sources (participants were asked to recall the products in the order they believed they were presented). This reduced the risk of some adverts being recalled more or less due to their distinctiveness. Independent and dependent variables: In this experiment the independent variable was the serial position of an advert,

  1. An investigation to discover the effects of retroactive interference on memory recall.

    I will have to use this room when the library isn't in use and between lessons to restrict noise from the bell or corridor noise from other pupils. There are several disadvantages of having it in the library such as they is a lot of books and colourful posters in

  2. This study is based on the theory of cue dependent forgetting - more specifically, ...

    to deceive the participants and we would not have been able to get informed consent. For this reason, the ethics of some field experiments can be questioned. Following the experiment the participants were informed of the expected results in a debriefing session, eliminating any feelings of inadequacy and in doing so complied with the guideline on debriefing.

  1. An experiment to investigate whether chunking leads to better recall.

    The primacy recency affect, which can be shown on a serial position graph, supports the idea of separate STM and LTM. The theory is that ease of learning an item depends upon its position in the list of items to be learned.

  2. Will participants have a better recall of words when they are presented in an ...

    The most efficient learners were those that actively sought to categorise the material to be learned, however, most people only did this when they were asked to do so. All of the above studies arrive at the same conclusion; that the better the organisation of information, the better the recall

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work