• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider the extent to which the working memory model is an improvement over the multi-store model.

Extracts from this document...


Consider the extent to which the working memory model is an improvement over the multi-store model. The working memory model was researched by Baddeley and Hitch in 1976, and is an improvement over the multi-store model of memory because it is more detailed, and therefore we can learn more about the stores of memory in the brain from it. The main weakness with the multi-store model of memory is that it is over simplified, as it implies that there are only two memory stores, one short-term and one long-term, and that memories are only stored through rehearsal, but this does not seem to be true in real life, as many memories are stored not having been consciously rehearsed. ...read more.


A study by McLeod in 1977 showed that two auditory tasks cannot be done fully at the same time, e.g. playing the piano and singing a song, this shows that the two tasks are competing in the auditory part of the brain, and helps us to understand that all auditory tasks are done in a certain part of the brain. The phonological loop has two parts to it, an articulatory process, (i.e. the process of speaking) and a phonological store, (which allows information to be rehearsed acoustically). Baddeley and Lewis (1981) found that articulatory suppression (a task which stops you speaking), did not affect decisions involving phonological differences, so showing that there must be a separate store. ...read more.


Another reason why the working memory model is an improvement on the multi-store model is because it only has rehearsal taking place in one area instead of it being the most important part as it is in the multi-store model. Also the working memory model supports the evidence we have from brain damaged patients, much better than the multi store model. Shallice and Warrington studied KF, who had a normal LTM, but a damaged STM. However his short term forgetting of auditory stimuli was much larger than his short term forgetting of visual stimuli, i.e. he was able to remember meaningful sounds, but not words. The working memory model is a big improvement over the multi store model, because it is in much more detail, and also has more evidence to support it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate the Multi-store Model of memory.

    3 star(s)

    In addition, it was found that recall was significantly better for words which had been analysed semantically (i.e. rated for pleasantness or frequency) than words which had been rated superficially (i.e. detecting 'e' and 'g'). This is in line with the theory because semantic analysis is assumed to be a deeper level of processing than structural analysis.


    very reliable result, as it shows the results are widely spread around the mean. This could also relate to the mean result collected for group 2 not very reliable and resulting in the standard deviation being widely spread out. The graph shows the mean averages of both group's sets of data.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    The experimenter will be addressing all ethical issues arising from this study, so that it is in line with British Psychological Society (BPS) guidelines. Ethical issues state that the experimenter can conduct the investigation with the BPS criteria met. Evidence of the guidelines being met was based on the judgement

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    investigation to see whether two tasks can be successfully performed at once. They assumed two initial ideas: 1. if two tasks are making use of the same component of STM they cannot be performed in unison successfully, 2. if two tasks are making use of two different components of STM they can be performed in unison successfully.

  1. How Valid is the Modal Model of Memory?

    Visual information is thought to be retained in the iconic store, first postulated by Sperling (1960, in Gross, 1992), and auditory information is thought to be retained in the echoic store (Neisser, 1967, in Gross, 1992). The sensory, STM and LTM can be thought of as being the structure of

  2. An experiment to support the assumption that there are two distinct memory stores in ...

    got displaced due to the limited capacity of the short term memory. Aim: To see how well participants recall a list of words and if the position of the words affects their ability to recall as many words as possible.

  1. The Multistore model of memory

    P's asked to recall the whole grid, showed poorer recall (42%) whereas those asked to recall a row showed better recall (75%). This suggests how rapid decay happens in SS. 2. Glanzer & Cuntiz proved the existences of STM and LTM via the serial position effect.

  2. Alternatives to the multi store model of memory.

    Visual information is what things look like. Spatial information is about the position of objects in relation to each other. Logie suggested the VSSP can be divided in the visual cache which stores information about form and colour and the inner scribe which deals with spatial and movement information.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work