• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider the extent to which the working memory model is an improvement over the multi-store model.

Extracts from this document...


Consider the extent to which the working memory model is an improvement over the multi-store model. The working memory model was researched by Baddeley and Hitch in 1976, and is an improvement over the multi-store model of memory because it is more detailed, and therefore we can learn more about the stores of memory in the brain from it. The main weakness with the multi-store model of memory is that it is over simplified, as it implies that there are only two memory stores, one short-term and one long-term, and that memories are only stored through rehearsal, but this does not seem to be true in real life, as many memories are stored not having been consciously rehearsed. ...read more.


A study by McLeod in 1977 showed that two auditory tasks cannot be done fully at the same time, e.g. playing the piano and singing a song, this shows that the two tasks are competing in the auditory part of the brain, and helps us to understand that all auditory tasks are done in a certain part of the brain. The phonological loop has two parts to it, an articulatory process, (i.e. the process of speaking) and a phonological store, (which allows information to be rehearsed acoustically). Baddeley and Lewis (1981) found that articulatory suppression (a task which stops you speaking), did not affect decisions involving phonological differences, so showing that there must be a separate store. ...read more.


Another reason why the working memory model is an improvement on the multi-store model is because it only has rehearsal taking place in one area instead of it being the most important part as it is in the multi-store model. Also the working memory model supports the evidence we have from brain damaged patients, much better than the multi store model. Shallice and Warrington studied KF, who had a normal LTM, but a damaged STM. However his short term forgetting of auditory stimuli was much larger than his short term forgetting of visual stimuli, i.e. he was able to remember meaningful sounds, but not words. The working memory model is a big improvement over the multi store model, because it is in much more detail, and also has more evidence to support it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate the Multi-store Model of memory.

    3 star(s)

    There is evidence that these separate stores exist, such as dual task capacity In conclusion, the working memory model appears to have a number of advantages over the simplistic formulation of the Atkinson and Shiffrin concept of STM. There is little empirical evidence to support the working memory model but


    very reliable result, as it shows the results are widely spread around the mean. This could also relate to the mean result collected for group 2 not very reliable and resulting in the standard deviation being widely spread out. The graph shows the mean averages of both group's sets of data.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    And if participants pull out from this investigation, then other participants will be needed to take their place.

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    investigation to see whether two tasks can be successfully performed at once. They assumed two initial ideas: 1. if two tasks are making use of the same component of STM they cannot be performed in unison successfully, 2. if two tasks are making use of two different components of STM they can be performed in unison successfully.

  1. How Valid is the Modal Model of Memory?

    It was Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968) who presented the most abundant and perhaps the most widely recognised version of the modal model when they added a further dimension to the two store dichotomy by introducing the concept of sensory memory. Only a tiny fraction of the enormous amount of sensory information received from the environment is thought to be selected for further processing.

  2. To what extent does research support the multi store model?

    Korsakov Syndrome (type of brain damage) causes patients to have faulty STM, but intact LTM. The positive points that support the multi store model of memory have shown that where there are criticisms against the model, there are also perfectly valid arguments for the model.


    An analysis of sound (phonemic processing), for example: 'Does the word rhyme with "train"?' Or an analysis of meaning (deeper processing), such as: 'Is the word a type of fruit?' They concluded that deeper processing leads to enhanced memory. Whereas Morris et al.

  2. To What Extent Is motivated Forgetting Produced By Failure Feedback?

    Procedure - with failure feedback (experimental group) For the test with the scores, the instructions (S), that are in the brackets, had to be included, as well as the main instructions. The rest of the procedure is the same as in the control group but after the first response sheet,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work