• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate the traditional view(s) of memory as cited by Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968), in the light of the evidence provided by two other models of memory. What is memory?

Extracts from this document...


Andrew Swale Critically evaluate the traditional view(s) of memory as cited by Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968), in the light of the evidence provided by two other models of memory. What is memory? Memory is the most extensively studied field in the discipline of cognitive psychology. Recognising your first year teacher in a line at the airport. Getting a phone number from information and then dialling it. Seeing that you're in danger of checkmate in three moves. Riding a bike. Understanding the meaning of 'riding a bike'. What do all these things have in common? Memory. Virtually everything we do involves memory in one form or another. It shouldn't be surprising, then, that the structures and processes involved in memory have been the focus of a great deal of theoretical and experimental research in psychology, neuroscience and other related disciplines. Memory is essential to all our lives and is involved in processing vast amounts of information. It not only involves taking this information in but also storing it and retrieving it. There are different models of memory, and out of these there are 3 main ones. The first and earliest one was suggested by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) ...read more.


Atkinson & Shiffrin suggested that the longer information was held in STM the more likely it was to be transferred to LTM, and there is some experimental evidence to show this, when Rundus (1971) asked participants to rehearse a list of items out loud and found that the more frequently an item was rehearsed the more likely it was to be recalled. But then in the early seventies, Craik & Lockhart (1972) proposed an alternative to the multistore model. They suggested that the strength of a memory trace can be determined by the level of processing for that trace. This theory can be best described by comparing the levels of processing in a pyramid: - The bottom levels represent preliminary, shallow processing and are concerned with physical and sensory features, like lines, angles, brightness, pitch etc. The top levels of the pyramid represent deep processing and are concerned with the extraction of meaning. The information may undergo elaboration at any level e.g. the rehearsal of a phone number involves elaboration of a string of numbers at a very shallow level of processing, so although the information undergoes elaboration, it is not processed deeply and therefore will not be remembered for more than a few minutes. ...read more.


0ther criticisms of the multistore model are that it is now seen as passive and simplistic whereas Baddeley's working memory model is more complex. Shallice & Warrington (1974) looked at K.F whose visual/acoustic encoding was having problems, but his semantic encoding was untouched. Eysenck (1995) criticised 'rehearsal'. He said that they were saying only things that are rehearsed could go into LTM. He said this isn't the case. We are taking in stimuli from everywhere into the STM, not necessarily rehearsed, unless see life as one big rehearsal. He said very rarely in everyday life do we rehearse everything. Baddeley and Hitch also ignored the influence of LTM on STM (Van de Goot 1966). Also the multistore model is seen as limited in explanatory power when compared with other models such as the working memory model. Over the years the views on the models of memory and the actual models of memory themselves have gradually and sometimes greatly changed. Who knows what the future holds for the study and analysis of memory? Another model could be introduced or one could be ruled out completely, we will just have to wait and see. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Define short-term memory and describe the main factors that influence the number of items ...

    4 star(s)

    The length of the sequence is increased until the point where the subject fails every time. The sequence length at which they are correct half the time becomes their digit span (Baddeley 1999 [1]). This number of digits is the limit to which one can perform on this task.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    This distinction is related to that made by Ryle (1949) between 'knowing that' and 'knowing how'. Declarative knowledge corresponds to knowing that. For example you know that you had roast beef on Sunday or you know that queen Elizabeth is our current monarch.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and Evaluate 2 Models Of Memory

    4 star(s)

    He found out that the majority of errors involved a substitution of a letter by another letter of a similar sound. However, it is very easy to lose the information due to decay or displacement. Displacement means that new information pushes out the old information as the capacity of the

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Memory Process. This paper will describe a memory test using numbers, letters, and ...

    3 star(s)

    I chose to do the letters test. You are given 10 seconds to remember the list. The next screen pops up and gives you the opportunity to enter the three letters. This process continues for as many sequences you can make it through. The purpose was to go through consecutively recalling the letters.


    whether the participants were subjected to distraction or not. The dependent variable (DV) (which was measured in this experiment was) the number of words recalled from the list of 10 words. The extraneous variable (EV) which could have caused a change in the DV in this experiment could be; Any

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    Group 1 were given the list containing the 10 words and were given 1 minute to look and learn them before being asked for a recall test. Group 2 were given the 10 words in a list whilst listening to music.

  1. 'Organisation in Memory'.

    a quiet area, will hopefully also deal with overcrowding from acting as a confounding variable. To eliminate the issue of participants' having a photographic memory, I will ask each participant beforehand if they have a photographic memory. If they answer 'yes' then I will not use them as participants in my experiment.

  2. Outline and evaluate the working memory model

    This would imply that the central executive is too vague and does not really explain anything. Critics also feel that the notion of a single central executive is wrong and that there are probably several components. The study of EVR (Eslinger and Damasio, 1985)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work