• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate the traditional view(s) of memory as cited by Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968), in the light of the evidence provided by two other models of memory. What is memory?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Andrew Swale Critically evaluate the traditional view(s) of memory as cited by Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968), in the light of the evidence provided by two other models of memory. What is memory? Memory is the most extensively studied field in the discipline of cognitive psychology. Recognising your first year teacher in a line at the airport. Getting a phone number from information and then dialling it. Seeing that you're in danger of checkmate in three moves. Riding a bike. Understanding the meaning of 'riding a bike'. What do all these things have in common? Memory. Virtually everything we do involves memory in one form or another. It shouldn't be surprising, then, that the structures and processes involved in memory have been the focus of a great deal of theoretical and experimental research in psychology, neuroscience and other related disciplines. Memory is essential to all our lives and is involved in processing vast amounts of information. It not only involves taking this information in but also storing it and retrieving it. There are different models of memory, and out of these there are 3 main ones. The first and earliest one was suggested by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) ...read more.

Middle

Atkinson & Shiffrin suggested that the longer information was held in STM the more likely it was to be transferred to LTM, and there is some experimental evidence to show this, when Rundus (1971) asked participants to rehearse a list of items out loud and found that the more frequently an item was rehearsed the more likely it was to be recalled. But then in the early seventies, Craik & Lockhart (1972) proposed an alternative to the multistore model. They suggested that the strength of a memory trace can be determined by the level of processing for that trace. This theory can be best described by comparing the levels of processing in a pyramid: - The bottom levels represent preliminary, shallow processing and are concerned with physical and sensory features, like lines, angles, brightness, pitch etc. The top levels of the pyramid represent deep processing and are concerned with the extraction of meaning. The information may undergo elaboration at any level e.g. the rehearsal of a phone number involves elaboration of a string of numbers at a very shallow level of processing, so although the information undergoes elaboration, it is not processed deeply and therefore will not be remembered for more than a few minutes. ...read more.

Conclusion

0ther criticisms of the multistore model are that it is now seen as passive and simplistic whereas Baddeley's working memory model is more complex. Shallice & Warrington (1974) looked at K.F whose visual/acoustic encoding was having problems, but his semantic encoding was untouched. Eysenck (1995) criticised 'rehearsal'. He said that they were saying only things that are rehearsed could go into LTM. He said this isn't the case. We are taking in stimuli from everywhere into the STM, not necessarily rehearsed, unless see life as one big rehearsal. He said very rarely in everyday life do we rehearse everything. Baddeley and Hitch also ignored the influence of LTM on STM (Van de Goot 1966). Also the multistore model is seen as limited in explanatory power when compared with other models such as the working memory model. Over the years the views on the models of memory and the actual models of memory themselves have gradually and sometimes greatly changed. Who knows what the future holds for the study and analysis of memory? Another model could be introduced or one could be ruled out completely, we will just have to wait and see. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    When later learning disrupts memory for earlier learning, this is known as retroactive interference (which was the kind of interference proposed for short term memory.) Cue dependent forgetting - this is a classic example of forgetting due to lack of accessibility.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Memory Process. This paper will describe a memory test using numbers, letters, and ...

    3 star(s)

    I think what helped me remember more was the information I read on chunking (Braingle, 1999-2012). The Role of Encoding The role of encoding is to acquire information. This is the preliminary structure of memory (Terry, 2009). In the memory test I took online; encoding was used as I recalled the letters from using the chunking technique.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate the Multi-store Model of memory.

    3 star(s)

    This suggests that the flow of information through the system is interactive rather than strictly sequential as Atkinson and Shiffrin suggested.

  2. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    whether the participants were subjected to distraction or not. The dependent variable (DV) (which was measured in this experiment was) the number of words recalled from the list of 10 words. The extraneous variable (EV) which could have caused a change in the DV in this experiment could be; Any

  1. 'Organisation in Memory'.

    All of the major concepts are known as 'nodes' and each one of these has a number of different properties associated with it. These nodes are all inter-linked. Retrieval of information was suggested to occur by searching through the semantic hierarchy.

  2. Categorisation in Long-Term Memory

    This sampling method was chosen because it was quick and convenient. Apparatus * Two lists of the same words (one organised into categories, one random). The words are nouns with only between 1-3 syllables that are used quite frequently in every day life * Pen/Pencil (for participants to write the words they remembered)

  1. Explain and evaluate the three models of memory.

    Atkinson and Shiffrin believed that the attention had to be paid to this object so that it could be transferred to short-term memory, which only has a capacity of 7�2 items and information can be held for duration of upto30seconds.

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    The participants will be given music to listen to for a period of a minute immediately after looking at the words. This group of people will then be asked for the recall of the words remembered. These will also be recorded.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work