• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and Evaluate 2 Models Of Memory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe and Evaluate 2 Models Of Memory In this essay 2 models of memory will be described and compared. They are the Atkinson and Sniffrin model of memory, the Multistore model, and Crain and Lockhart model, the Levels of Processing Model. Models of memory are primitive diagrams of human memory to help understand the flow of information and how it is stored. In order to evaluate those 2 models appropriately it is important to understand how old they are. The Multistore Model of Memory by Atkinson and Shiffrin is a very primitive model although it does try to explain how the memory works quite well. It recognises 3 memory stores - the Sensory Memory Store, the short-term memory store and the long-term memory store. The environment makes available a variety of sources of information. The information comes in through the sensory system - through one of the five human senses. For a brief time it gets stored in the sensory memory store; 2 seconds for auditory and 0.5 second for visual information. It is an exact copy of the stimulus, although it lasts for a very short time. The experiment done by Sperling in 1960, where he showed a quick image to the participants and asked them to write the answers down, supports the theory of existence of the Sensory memory store, as participants could only remember 36% of the image on average. ...read more.

Middle

He could remember anything he had learnt prior to surgery but no more information could be transferred to LTM. This supports the idea that in there is 2 memory stores, and the link between them can be damaged, which shows that in order to get to LTM, the information has to go through STM. However, in 1970, reported a patient, known as KF, who suffered brain damage, which impaired his STM but left his LTM intact. In terms of the multimodel it cannot happen, as it suggests that all information has to go through STM in order to reach LTM. Also, further inverstigation revealed that KF's STM impairment was mainly for verbal material as his memory for visual and meaningful material was largery unnafected. This suggests the possibility of more than one STM store, which is also supported by the critisism of Tuluing in 1972, who suggested that there are actually 2 separate LTM stores - the semantic and episodic memory. This is possible, as there were cases of brain damaged people, who could remember the factual knowledge, such as common sense knowledge, before their brain damage, but could not remember who they were. Squire also suggested a procedural memory, which involves skills and motor abilities. The model looks too simplistic and rigid as human brain is a very complicated structure. For example it suggests that rehearsal is the only way to transfer information to LTM. ...read more.

Conclusion

The evidence only relates to learning and recognising words. Baddaley, in 1978, critised the model and said that the theory is difficult to test as there is no objective way of measuring depth of processing. Parin, in 1993, also said about the experiment conducted by Crain and Lockhart, that in some cases, participants did not have to read the word to be able to answer the question, so the test was very unfair. It is not very easy to compare the 2 modesl. They are very different in their styles but they do try and show similar patterns. They both show that some kind of attention needs to be paid to information, in order to transfer it to STM and LTM. However, the multistore memory shows that in order for the information to get transferred to LTM, it has to be rehearsed, whereas the Levels of Processing model shows that it is enoungh for the input to trigger some kind of association on semantic level for it to be transferred to LTM. The Levels of Processing does not show any Memory Stores or where the memory is stored, so it is quite limited, whereas the other model does show 3 memory stores. The levels of processing model is very limited as it does not show where information is stored and how it is forgotten. I think the multistore model, although very simplistic does give a better understanding about the human memory that the other one. It is a very good model for the time it was made and it is based on reliable evidence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Summary

This is quite a complex subject to cover without getting bogged down in technical terms. However, the writer has managed to discuss and critique the two models well. Various studies and experiments have been quoted to back the different models. An even higher score could be expected if the writer went into a little more detail with regards the experiments. Also, the conclusion could be improved upon. Personal opinions should not be given and the conclusions should be evidence based. Overall the essay is detailed and it is in the writer's own words.

RATING 4*

Marked by teacher Linda Penn 07/08/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In this essay I am going to contrast and compare three approaches in psychology ...

    4 star(s)

    According to the theory of reinforcement, these financial helps are positive reinforcements (rewards) for 'good' behaviours (get more educated). Social learning theory is another approach to behaviourism of Albert Brandura. It 'emphasizes the importance of observing and modelling the behaviours, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others.'

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    The researcher handed out everyone another A4 sheet and turned on the radio for condition B. At this point, the other band member left the room, as previously arranged with the researcher. The researcher informed the participants that she was going to call out another fifteen words and that they were not to write anything at this time.

  1. The Effect Chunking of Numbers has on Short-Term Memory Recall.

    Extraneous variables such as temperature and outside distractions could not be controlled. The temperature of the area in which the experiment was conducted varied. A set of instructions read out before the start of the experiment dealt with ethical issues that may be related to this study, such as informed consent, deception and ability to withdraw.

  2. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    measure of dispersion since it takes into account all scores in a set of data. The standard deviation for condition 1 is 3.6 and 3.9 for condition 2, showing scores for condition 2 is more varied. Although scores for condition 1 are closely arranged around the mean of 14.1 demonstrating results for condition 1 (less varied)

  1. Recall in Memory Using Mnemonics

    There will be an interference task (duration 30 seconds) to eliminate Primacy and Recency Effects. Participants Number: 20 - decreased bias compared to a smaller group. Equal numbers of participants in each condition and equal numbers of males and females in each group to decrease gender biases. Selection: The Opportunity Sampling method will be used, as it is the easiest and quickest method.

  2. Critically assess Piaget's theory of cognitive development

    They no longer need to be able to physically see an example of an action or problem; instead they are able to manipulate the ideas in their heads to reach the correct conclusion. They are also able to grasp hypothetical situations and problems that they may never have encountered before and will tackle problems systematically (Hill, 2001, pp 37).

  1. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    as it takes a long time therefore likely to cost more with the amount of sessions involved and any theories about dreams are very subjective as one therapist could have a different suggestion or explanation to another. Psychoanalysis: In psychoanalysis a therapist would have a patient lie on a couch,

  2. Explain Gibson's bottom up/ direct theory of perception

    Some people may see one possible image while other people may see a second form suggesting higher cognitive processes, experiences and knowledge as Gregory proposed, influenced perception and may it may not be a direct processes as Gibson?s theorized. This would undermine Gibson?s theory as we should see the same

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work