• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The multi-store model can be explained in terms of 3 stores, sensory, short term and long term stores

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Faddy Oraha ? Miss. Foy 04/10/2012 Outline and Evaluate The Multistore Model (12) The multi-store model can be explained in terms of 3 stores, sensory short term and long term stores and 2 process, attention and rehearsal. Information first enters the sensory store directly from the senses. It remains in the sensory store for a maximum duration of around 2 seconds before it decays and is replaced with new information. If information in the sensory store is attended to then it can be passed to the short term store. ...read more.


However, when new information enters the short term store is displaces any information that is already there, meaning that information that isn?t rehearsed and passed to the long term store is forgotten. When information enters the long term store it remains there for a life time, as the capacity and duration of the store is unlimited. There is evidence to support the Multistore model that there are separate short term and long term stores is provided by research into the primacy and recency effect by Glanzer & Cunitz. ...read more.


Therefore, earlier items are rehearsed and transferred to the LTM, whilst later items are recalled because they are still in the STM. However, this model has been criticised by being reductionist as it over-simplifies memory which is a very complex human process. It only assumes there is only long term and short term stores. This has been disproved by clinical evidence for example KF had damaged his STM but was able to recall memories from his LTM store. Furthermore, most of the supporting evidence lacks ecological evidence as they were conducted in artificial settings, which may not reflect how memory works in everyday life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays


    No pilot study was carried out. PARTICIPANTS 20 participants were used in this investigation. These participants were chosen by random selection. This meant that everyone in the target population have an equal chance of being selected. 30 names of participants of the target population were put into separate bowl; each

  2. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    Whilst both sets of results, they do not form perfect U shapes and so are not entirely conclusive. The primacy corresponds to the left hand side of the graph, and the recency to the right. On both sides the graph is generally higher than in the middle, and this is conclusive evidence that both a primacy and recency effect exist.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    their results and they had the right to withdraw their results if they wanted. After the experiment they were fully told verbally and also in the debrief section about the main aim of the experiment, what the experiment was testing, and what the results were to be used for, they

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    One finding contradicted the Levels of Processing theory, though. It was found that participants who were asked to perform the sentence frame task- deciding whether the words would fit into a given sentence frame- gave the lowest level of recall in the experiment. This involved analysing the data semantically and so should have reflected deep processing, yet the low

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    Deceiving the participants and not receiving their informed consent were considered as limitations. First, the participants were not fully 'informed' of all aspects of the research. However, a major problem with informed consent is the possibilities that the researcher will reveal their aim which would generate invalidate findings.

  2. An experiment to support the assumption that there are two distinct memory stores in ...

    words in the middle and this can be seen by the curve formed in graph 1. It is similar to the pattern known as the serial position curve that Glanzer and Cunitz (1968) came up with in their free recall experiment.

  1. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    Thus, information in the middle of the list is forgotten, as it has not been rehearsed and new information coming into the STM displaces it. Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) investigated the idea of there being two mechanisms in free recall.

  2. How can forgetting over the short term be explained best?

    and Wundt (1860s) were (as cited by Gross, 1992) two of the first psychologists to maintain that short term memory is limited to a specific number of pieces of information. They claimed that the short term memory could hold about 7 bit of separate information in different slots, so to speak. This size was later argued by Miller (1956)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work