• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making. Conscience can be defined as something within each of us that tells us what is right and what is wrong. In Latin ?Con? means with and ?science? means knowledge. Therefore we should surely use our conscience when we are making decisions as we should be being told what is the right thing to do and what is wrong. This however doesn?t always seem to be the case. The problem with using your conscience is that it is not consistent. We can see this when claims have been made after someone made the wrong choice. For example at the time he was Prime minister Tony Blair took the choice to go to war with Iraq. It is widely regarded as being the wrong choice to have made and Tony Blair said in response that he was following his conscience. There are religious and secular (non-religious) views on the conscience. The religious views have been developed from biblical teaching and the divine command theory. However there is more than one interpretation about the conscience. Thomas Aquinas for example believed that people should follow their conscience totally as long as your principles are right because it is the voice of reason. On the other hand Butler argued the conscience comes form intuition. ...read more.


He therefore saw that our conscience will continuously change in different circumstances not making it a reliable source to make a decision on. Augustine too believed that we should take it seriously and listen to our conscience because we are hearing the word of God. Therefore Newman, Augustine and Butler take a much less rationalist view upon conscience compared to Aquinas but as all four believe that God is involved with our Conscience it is important to use it when making moral-decisions, especially if we believe in God. Due to there being Secular views on the conscience the debate over nurture or nature has risen. This is questioning whether we get our morals and our conscience before we are born or whether we develop morality as we get older. With this argument there is also the belief that we have both. For example a Secularist could hold that we are born with our natural instincts that encourage us to do good because it will encourage our survival. This would be a Darwinian approach. The same person could then argue that we also develop our morals during life that allow us to fit into society and the rules and regulations that surround it. A religious person could say the same except that we would have been given a conscience before we were born by God. ...read more.


The most important moral development occurs through social interactions. Fromm on the other hand had two approaches and didn?t think there was stages in moral development but saw that all humans are influenced by external authorities like parents, teachers and church leaders. He thought that a guilty conscience is a result of displeasing these authorities. The example of the Nazi government in Germany in the 1930?s was very successful about manipulating the conscience?s of its people to encourage them not to help the Jews. But that was his authoritarian approach and he had a humanistic approach. This was that our conscience is our real self and leads us to realise our full potential using our experiences not slavish obedience. It appears the conscience should take a large role in how we make moral decisions. However for both Secular and Religious views on the conscience we have seen that mistakes can be made. These mistakes are the products of wrong principles or bad nurturing as a child growing up or manipulations and bad influences. Therefore conscience should take a big role in making moral decisions but one should also consider the fact that they may be wrong and should compare the choice they want to make to another to see if one is greater. Key issue is found in a resolution of the nature nurture debate. The origin of conscience Try to come to a conclusion that focuses on the key issue.. Is the conscience in anyway linked to God and moral absolutism B 75% ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

    Thomistic philosophy places the conscience in a divine rank; alongside the Bible, the Church and Mankind as a whole. It is divine and institutional law; guided through human mechanisms by the Synderesis Rule: "the innate principle in the moral consciousness of every person which directs the agent to good and restrains him from evil"5.

  2. Natural law is the most reliable approach when making judgements about sex and relationships. ...

    All of which are ideas and elements in which have to be taken account for, especially when making judgements about sex and relationships. Sex as procreation, is something in which is a very historical view of sex. Sex as procreation is the exact feeling in which natural law has towards

  1. Assess the view that conscience is given to us by God.

    An evolutionary standpoint as suggested by Dawkins seems more logical. Aquinas gives a rationalistic account of conscience (compared to the intuitive account of Newman). Conscience is a process or tool which allows us to reach informed moral decisions. Aquinas believes conscience comes in two parts, synderisis the knowledge of right

  2. Assess the view that conscience is not the voice of God, but is learned?

    Synderesis was the repeated use of what Aquinas considered as being 'right reason'. By which a person acquires knowledge of basic moral principles and understands that it is important to do good. The Conscientia is the actual ethical judgement and decisions a person makes which leads to a particular course of action based upon these principles.

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    state (as in theocracy), this religious politics may not be a bad idea. For example, if those with authority look to God for advice on political matters, it gives them a chance to think about and 'receive information' (either from God, or simply thinking it through in prayer, or even

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    Nietzsche then gives the example: "The Master exploits the Slave" The argument he makes is that just as the bird of prey has no choice but to kill the lamb, so too, the master has no choice but to exploit the slave, it is neither moral nor immoral, it is life.

  1. What is authority?

    broad sense, exercising "power" or "influence" could be defined as "affecting what another person does". In this sense obviously authority is a form of power, since exercising authority must Involve affecting what someone else does. However, the notion of authority still seems not to fit more specific senses of power or influence, such as: (a)

  2. Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason

    Everyone has a duty to help suffering people; Kant will also agree with this, however, Kant does not agree that it is possible that such duties are possible without selfishly achieving some happiness themselves. Take for example, an aid worker: if they are asked whether they love their job, they

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work