• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this experiment we are investigating the effect of concentration on the current flowing through a copper sulpahte solution.

Extracts from this document...



In this experiment we are investigating the effect of concentration on the current flowing through a copper sulpahte solution.


I think that the higher the concentration the higher the current passing through the solution, I also think that the higher the voltage, the higher the current. I think this will happen because there will be more copper sulphate molecules. Since there are more copper sulphate molecules, then there will be more sulphate ions giving up electrons to the anode (positive electrode) and more copper ions receiving electrons from the cathode, this means that there will be more electrons being transferred and so a higher current. The ions will break their ionic bonds because the copper plates are given a larger positive and negative charge by the battery (the circuit) and so the small force holding the ions together will be overpowered by the larger force of the electrodes on the ions. The liquid medium allows the ions to move freely and is what allows all of this to happen (The molecules in a liquid are more spaced out than in a solid (molecules in a solid bunched close together, with only enough room and energy to vibrate) and so this gives the ions the space and ability to move around and to actually get to the electrodes).

...read more.


  1. Turn the transformer to 2V and then switch on the current making sure the circuit is set up as shown.
  1. Take down the Amps and Volts from the equipment, into a results table like that below.
  1. Turn off the current and then repeat again with the current set to 4V and so on until you reach the maximum of 12V. You should have 5 results for this concentration.
  1. Repeat this experiment again with the same equipment etc to get something to compare to and to get an average from.
  1. Put another 1g of copper sulphate into the solution, to make 2g and then repeat the previous steps, getting five results and then repeating the experiment to get another five results that should be similar.
  1. Do the same with another 1g making it 3g of copper sulphate.
  1. Continue with this pattern until 5g of copper sulphate has been added in total and has been tested and retested with a total of 10 results.




Having drawn a graph from the results I obtained from the experiment, I can see that I have proven my prediction by the fact that as the concentration increases (when I add 1g of copper sulphate to the solution) the current goes up(this can be seen

...read more.


        There were obviously things that were ever so slightly off in our experiment, these things could have occurred for a number of reasons:


∙ The scaling of the equipment (we took our measurements to 2 decimal places) meant that the measurement could have been 0.005 either way of what was written. This could lead to 2 readings of 0.04 when there should have been 0.35 and 0.44.

Human Error

∙Measurement of Copper Sulphate- This could obviously effect the experiment but I believe we measured our copper sulphate with a good degree of accuracy.

∙Solution- The copper sulphate could not have fully dissolved(we may have not stirred it enough). This could mean that the amount of copper sulphate effecting the experiment was reduced and so the results could be made inaccurate.

These are the only mistakes or inaccuracies really that could have had an effect on OUR experiment, due to the fact that other factors were closely watched and did and could not have happened.

Future Experiments

A follow on experiment to do after this experiment could be to try a different ionic compound and see if it works in the same way. Perhaps the solution would only work with an electrode made from one of the compounds elements, or maybe it would not matter and the solution would change. I believe this experiment would be very interesting.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics essays

  1. Thermistor Coursework

    900 2.751 2.350 0.401 1000 2.645 2.122 0.523 1100 2.521 2.111 0.41 1200 2.500 2.000 0.5 1300 2.400 1.910 0.49 1400 2.315 1.836 0.479 1500 2.244 1.778 0.466 (See Table 1) The fixed resistance that gives me the greatest range of results is 1000 ?.

  2. Single Phase Transformer (Experiment) Report.

    If I look closely at the results worked out for the graph, say for 220V (the rated voltage), gives 13.00000 Watts for the input power, where for power loss the value is 12.99999. This shows that there is a small amount of power which is not lost; this power is then amplified at the secondary coil.

  1. The electrolysis of copper from copper sulphate solution

    pure enough to be used as copper wiring, which has approximately 99.98 percent pure copper, we need to get the impure copper anode to help make the copper wiring which is so much purer than the anode itself. The purification process begins is at the anode.

  2. How does the mass of copper plated in the electrolysis of copper sulphate solution ...

    point is going to be twice the other one on my scales. The graph is going to be Current against the mass lost at the anode and at the cathode. This is going to show me the relationship of current and mass deposited.

  1. Electrolysis of Copper Sulphate Solution.

    I will now do more preliminary work to test if changing the concentration will produce a good range of results. Volume of Copper Sulphate(ml) Volume of Water(ml) Current(amps) 100 0 0.12 90 10 0.11 80 20 0.11 70 30 0.10 60 40 0.6 50 50 0.8 The results are not too close together or too far apart.

  2. Investigating the factors affecting the size of current flowing through a length of resistivity ...

    My prediction can be explained using scientific knowledge, understanding of laws and rearranging formulae: Resistivity, which I mentioned earlier, is defined as: "the resistance of a specimen of unit length and unit cross-sectional area." This implies that the resistance (R) of a conductor is directly proportional to the resistivity (?)

  1. Investigating the factors that affect the conductance of a solution

    Temperature Again make sure that all concentrations of solutions used in the experiment are uncontaminated since this would immediately make the results of the experiment invalid. Then set up the apparatus as shown on diagram 2. Then measure 50 ml of sodium chloride into the beaker.

  2. Is polymer electronics the future of TV screens

    There are a wide range of printing processes which can be used, but the most common are 'gravure' and 'flexo' printing. Gravure printing is when the printed structure is engraved on a steel cylinder, while in flexo printing the pattern is made in a raised structure of plastic material.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work